By Property Soul
On December 5, the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS) announced the reduction of property tax for HDB flats in 2015. Three days later, there was an article “Property Tax cut for one in four private home owners” in The Straits Times. A week after their announcement, a representative from IRAS further elaborated how annual values are calculated in The Straits Times Forum (“Annual values of homes reflect market rents“; Dec 15).
Below are my two cents contribution after being a private home property tax payer for twelve years, with an attempt to demystify the five common myths of property tax.
1. Lower annual value does not necessarily mean lower property tax.
According to IRAS, effective Jan 1 next year, the annual value of 25.7 percent private homes has been reduced while only 1.4 percent has been adjusted upwards.
However, IRAS has implemented progressive tax rates for owner-occupied private residential properties since 1 Jan 2011. A property tax rate of 4 percent of annual value applies unless the annual value is over $65,000 (6 percent tax rate applies). For non-owner occupied properties, new progressive tax rates are implemented since 1 Jan 2014.
By end of November, owners should have received a letter from IRAS, informing them the revised progressive property tax structure for both owner-occupied and non-owner occupied private residential properties.
For rental properties, the brackets of annual values are narrower, with upward adjustment on the percentages of tax rates that ranges from 10 to 20 percent. Even if you are one of the lucky ones with a lower annual value for your property, you may still end up paying more property tax next year.
2. Annual values are not only reviewed annually.
The December 8 article in The Straits Times mentions that “some feel that the volatility in the property market cannot be captured by annual reviews”. Together with the statement from IRAS about the property tax relief of property owners, it gives the wrong impression that annual values of properties are reviewed once a year. If there are changes, they will be made effective at the beginning of every year.
However, besides end of every year, in the past I have received notices from IRAS in March, August and October about changes in annual value. And it is not unusual to have two adjustments in one year’s time.
3. Owners may not be notified of changes in advance.
Unlike any hike in bank interest rates for your housing loans, you won’t receive a notification telling you in advance that the new rates will be effective from next month and changes in repayments will be reflected in the following month.
IRAS usually gives owners one month’s notice. However, on two other separate occasions, the new annual value was being made effective immediately. One letter I received in mid-December had the new annual value backdated to November. Another one sent in early March backdated the change from February.
4. Annual value does not reflect the performance of the rental market.
Property tax is calculated by the annual value of the property. And annual value is estimated based on the rental transactions of similar properties nearby.
In other words, the annual value of your property is determined by the rentals of comparable homes, not the performance of the prevailing rental market.
There are currently 285,000 private residential properties in Singapore. From 1 Jan 2015, only 25.7 percent will have their annual value lowered. Do you think that only one in four private property owners are affected by the slowdown of the rental market?
Below is a chart that shows the annual values of four of my private residential properties as compared to the URA Rental Index from 2002 to 2014. You can see that three properties have their annual values reduced slightly only once throughout the years. For most of the time, they climb up in big steps.
my_property_tax
5. Not all private residential properties are created equal.
Property tax is a wealth tax based on property ownership. The pricier the property you buy, the higher the rental it can generate, and the more property tax you need to pay. Depending on the annual value, the new property tax rate for non-owner occupied properties ranges from 10 to 20 percent.
If your property is in an affluent neighborhood, there are chances that your neighbors have newly renovated their flat or built a swimming pool. The good rent they fetch can inevitably result in a higher annual value for your property.
In a bad economy, it is difficult to find tenants with good budget. High-end properties are therefore most susceptible to high vacancy rate in a slow rental market. However, annual value is the same whether a property is self-occupied, tenanted or vacant. Despite the fact that you don’t have a tenant to help you pay for your mortgage and maintenance fee, you still have to settle with a high property tax.
From 1 Jan 2014, landlords of non-owner occupied properties can no longer claim any refund of property tax for an unoccupied property. The same apply for properties unable to rent out or undergoing repairs.
Lastly, if you find the annual value of your property unreasonably high, you can appeal to IRAS to raise your objection. However, you have to be prepared that the subsequent adjustment can be lower, the same, or even higher.
As what our previous speaker Mr Leung Yew Kwong, Principal Tax Consultant at KPMG Services, told the The Straits Times,

“It’s not that the process is not transparent … it’s impossible for IRAS to go into every home to access the condition it is in.”

Remember the famous saying from Benjamin Franklin?

“In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes.”

 This article was first published at propertysoul.com

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

What the archbishop did not intend

By Alex Au – Sometimes, people respond to a hole by digging…

5 Minutes With… Tan Kin Lian on gambling

“I consider the risk of a gambling habit to be only part of a larger problem. We need to educate our young people about financial responsibility – to spend within their means and to avoid incurring debts that attract high rates of interest.” – Tan Kin Lian

Some funding for international students is justified, but $238 million is on the 'high side', says MP Leon Perera

The government spends about $238 million on scholarships and tuition grants for…

428齐聚芳林公园 公民发声关注“防假消息法”草案

一群志同道合的公民,将在本月28日下午3时至5时,齐聚芳林公园,对政府即将推行的《防止网络假消息及网络操纵》法案,表达他们的关注。 上述活动是由本社、公民组织:功能八号氏族会、社区行动网络(CAN)和“尊严”(MARUAH)联合召集主办。 聚会已获得国家公园批准,主办方欢迎关注我国公共舆论空间与言论自由的民众,参与将在4月28日举行的聚会,一同表达我们对新法案对公民社会带来的影响,进行理性的讨论。 届时,本地时评人梁实轩、Khush Chopra和政治工作者毕博渊也将在现场主讲。本社脸书也会实况直播聚会现场。 本月1日,《防止网络假消息及网络操纵》法案在国会经过一读。新法案赋予政府更大权力,可强制发出假消息的个人/网路平台,更正或撤下假新闻。不愿遵守指示的机构,可被判罚款高达100万元。 此外,恶意散播假消息、损害公共利益者,可被判坐牢长达10年、罚款最高10万元。 根据该法定义,任何包括论述、图像影音、数字或符号的声明,若整体或部分含有误导或不实,都属假消息。 值得注意的是,法案中并没有阐明,政府或相关机构如何定义、裁定如何归类假消息。 本地公民组织对于该法赋予政治职务者相关广泛的权力,感到担忧。功能八号氏族会就指出,法案几乎合法化了任何形式的审查。缺乏明确的功能标准定义,任何部长或公仆,都可以被指派为“主管部门”,有权力发出诸如要求更正、删除文章、停止通信、封锁、目标性更正、总更正指示、公开发信者网络位置、禁止令等等。 人权律师拉维也忧心,假设政府本身,涉及借用官方媒体散播假消息,有关法案却没有明确途径让公民挑战政府决定。在该法案第61条文下,部长还能发出“免死金牌”给特定人物或机构,例如官方媒体不受法案的对付。 媒体研究学者施仁乔教授则担忧,防假消息法产生的寒蝉效应远甚于现有的诽谤法。只要政府认为“公众对政府信心遭削弱”,或者有散播群体间敌意和仇恨的威胁,该法赋予更广泛的权力来抑制批评声音。