By Simon

“Singapore is clearly not ready yet for a serious political cartoonist.”

When I read the above sentence from the recently published article by Kishore Mahbubani, I could almost imagine my former lecturers from NUS circling “clearly not ready,” before scrawling in red ink “Please elaborate.”
One cannot help but wonder how Kishore Mahbubani, as an academic himself, could make such a sweeping claim without any supporting evidence at all.
cartoon press kishore
According to him, political cartoons can be useful to get Singaporeans to laugh more, as part of his overarching call to “Love Singapore,” but we need to “encourage a culture of cartoonists by getting some of our leading citizens to allow themselves to be parodied.”
Imagine that — pre-approved caricatures!
Sharpen your pencils, cartoonists…but first, please get permission from whom you are lampooning.
leslie chew make cartoons
If he had done so, Leslie Chew would probably have saved himself quite a lot of legal worries. At one expense, of course, his freedom to express himself.
The only thing Singapore needs for a culture of cartoonists to thrive is for politicians and government agencies to back down and grow a funny bone. In fact, only then can political satire, as a whole, flourish.

joshua_cartoon
Image by Joshua Chiang
Recently, just days before the opening of Dim Sum Dollies’ The History of Singapore — Part 2: The Growing Up Years, the show was slapped with an “Advisory 16: some mature content” rating. According to an MDA spokesperson the justification for this rating is the show’s “satirical socio-political references, which would be more suited for a mature audience.”
The rating is not restrictive, though. People below the age of 16 will not be denied entry to the show. A sensible person has to ask: Why rate the show in the first place then?
The censors in MDA must think young people are cultural dupes who can only be granted the privilege of satire after they have predigested it for them, and preempted their response with a warning.
The fact that Dream Academy, the theatre company behind the Dim Sum Dollies show, had to assure people that nothing was cut from the show speaks volumes. We have become all too used to the possibility of satire being silenced, whether through self-censorship by artists to avoid the ratings conundrum, or through the imposition of MDA regulations.
Satire, by its very nature, is a subversive enterprise. As the late, great George Carlin once said: “I think it’s the duty of the comedian[in turn, the satirist] to find out where the line is drawn, and cross it deliberately.”
Either you laugh during this transgression or you don’t.
A failed punchline that bridges no gap between the satirist and the audience is the only silence with which any satire should be judged.
Other than an interest in current affairs, all you need to be ready for political cartoons or any form of political satire is simply to be open to laughter.
joshua_cartoon2
Image by Joshua Chiang
Subscribe
Notify of
3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Press conference of Pang’s death reveals that he was crushed between howitzer gun barrel and cabin

Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) Operationally Ready National Serviceman, Corporal First Class (National…

王乙康: 三年期间,六所大学处理56起性行为不端案

教育部长王乙康周一(5月6日)指出,本地六所自主大学(AUs)在3年期间,共处理42起校园内不端性行为案件,另有14起涉及学生的案件发生在校园外。 2015年发生了17宗案件,2016年18宗,而2017年21宗。 56宗案件中,新加坡国立大学(NUS)占了25宗,2宗发生在拥有自家纪律委员会的耶鲁新加坡国立大学,20宗发生在南洋理工大学(NTU),以及6宗发生在新加坡管理大学(SMU)。新加坡科技设计大学(STUD)、新加坡理工学院(SIT)和新加坡社会科学大学(SUSS)各一宗。 王乙康表示,其中37宗案件涉及偷拍和录影弱势群体。 部长在回应国会议员林谋泉和朱倍庆,以及非选区议员贝理安(Leon Perera)询问有关发生在自主大学,涉及学生的不端性行为案件数据和大学教学纪律框架时,如是指出。 他表示,每间自主大学发生的案例与其学生数量有密切关系。他说道,在过去三年中,每1000名学生中涉及不端性行为案件的学生犯罪者比例为0.21、0.21和0.2,显示“没有明显的增加趋势”。 两方展开调查和惩罚 56宗案件中,37宗案件的受害者向警方报案。四宗案件尚在调查中,两宗案件没有足够证据提出控诉。剩下的31宗案件中,10宗属于“严重罪行”,且被判入狱10天至8个月之间,这包括了暴力对待受害者和多次窥视案件。 除了警方调查,校方也展开纪律处分程序,并在其权利范围内进行一系列处罚。王乙康指出,有关的处罚包括了官方谴责,将直接影响到学生的正式教学记录上,导致停学和开除学籍。 56宗案件中,有五宗正在等待进行纪律听证会,而有四名学生在接受制裁前,已经退学。 在剩下的47宗案件中,34宗案件接到官方谴责,26宗被罚长达两个学期的停学处分,而20宗的干案者直接被禁止步入学生宿舍。王乙康表示,有关的数据加起来并不是47宗,因为多数案件接受一系列处罚。…

马国民调:希盟政府获67巴仙选民满意

根据马国默迪卡民调中心,针对希盟政府执政百日进行民调,显示希盟政府仍获得67巴仙的满意度,其中,依据族群分别为79巴仙华裔、89巴仙印裔、62巴仙沙巴、砂拉越土著,以及58巴仙的巫裔选民支持。 该民调是从本月7日至14日,透过电话采访了1160位21岁以上,来自马来亚半岛、沙巴及砂拉越的选民。 询及马国是否正朝着正确轨道前进,有55巴仙表示认同,25巴仙表示不赞同,20巴仙则感到不确定。但是,有66巴仙受访者对政府经济管理感到满意,56巴仙对国家经济前景感到乐观。 另一方面,民调也显示仍有71巴仙选民对首相敦马哈迪表现感到满意。81巴仙公务员对马哈迪感到满意。 当前有50巴仙选民最关心通货膨胀问题,其次则为肃贪(32巴仙),再来这是捍卫马来主权及各族平等权益(21巴仙)。对于一马公司议题和前首相纳吉涉贪议题,分别仅占7及6巴仙。 “需更多时间落实” 敦马哈迪坦言,竞选宣言有些承诺需要更多时间落实,在大选前把他们放入宣言时,希盟也未料到能成功变天。 “但是当我们接管政府时,发现国家状况比我们预想的糟,前朝政府借了太多钱。”他说,致使现任政府在一个很严峻的环境下工作。 不过,他表示希盟政府仍会兑现诺言,他深知若无法兑现,将面对各界反贪,包括遭到反对党挞伐,导致在下届选举丢失政权。 不过,他有信心希盟拟定的大部分竞选宣言可在五年内完成。 另一方面,副首相旺阿兹莎则为希盟政府百日成绩打圆场,认为尽管无法兑现所有百日承诺,但并不需要公开道歉。 他强调,在10项百日承诺中,有两项已经兑现,即落实妇女公积金和废除消费税。