Connect with us

Current Affairs

Four useful expressions at showflats inspired by Taiwan girls

Published

on

taipei city
By Propertysoul
Last month I went for a five-day trip in Taipei.
After a 4½-hour flight, I was overwhelmed with fatigue and boredom. A lovely lady working in the Subway kiosk at the airport smiled at me a few meters away, using her coquettish voice to draw me to her eatery to order a sandwich meal. One by one, a few guys queued up behind me, probably all being put under the same spell.
That reminds me of the simple spell used by my three-year-old girl. She just needs to look at you with her innocent big eyes on that angelic face, then utters the word “please” helplessly with her cute little voice. In seconds, you are softened and surrendered to her request.
Charmed by a gentle voice
Similar to what you see in Taiwanese variety shows, Taiwan ladies tend to manifest their feminine qualities in front of guys, prospects or customers. The sincere look of concern, coupled with a flirtatious tone, can naturally grab the attention and admiration of the opposite sex (think Lin Chi-ling).
There are four phrases that local girls like to use:

  • 好可爱哦! (It’s so cute!)
  • 真的假的? (True or not?)
  • 搞什么? (What’s going on?)
  • 不好意思哦! (I’m so sorry.)

The affable voice of Taiwan girls, especially those working in the service and entertainment industry, was a big contrast to the gung-ho atmosphere of the election in the country.
For the next few days, whenever I walked into a shop or an eatery, I would be greeted by the gentle voice of a polite saleslady or a waitress. They wouldn’t follow you closely or hurry to tidy the shelves after you. Instead, they appeared just in time when you needed them. 好可爱哦!
“How are you? Is there anything I can help?”
“These are our specialties/new arrivals/bestsellers. Do you want to try?”
“These items are on sale now and there are more discounts if…”
“Take your time to look around.”
They smiled at me and said goodbye courteously even though I didn’t buy anything. They made me feel that I am a valued customer. 真的假的?
Imitation is the sincerest of flattery
On my last two days in Taipei, I decided to practice the four feminine phrases at property showflats and franchise shops.
Taiwan has the lowest transaction volume for residential home sales this year since SARS in 2003. With the next presidential election coming up in 2016, there are too many uncertainties. No one has the mood to look at properties. As a property expert laments, even when the buyer is happy with the area, the property and the price, after viewing the same unit over 10 times, he just can’t make the decision to buy! 搞什么?
New projects under construction had their sales gallery built in a multi-storey block, with a sparkling outlook and a grand entrance. Foreigners like me would easily mistake it as a luxurious service apartment or a 5-star hotel. Wow, 好可爱哦!
With remarkable hospitality of the Taiwanese, the gentle and polite salesladies would serve you drinks and local delicacies. Unlike in Singapore where developers show a ‘for-display only’ showflat or sometimes just the finishings, everything including the lobby, the elevators and the function rooms were all built. 好可爱哦!
The two biggest property agencies in Taiwan are Sin Yi (信义) and Yung Ching (永庆) which have franchise shops all over the country. The former passed me a company magazine which shared generously with buyers all the tips and traps of buying a home. The latter gave me two booklets on buying and selling properties in Taiwan, with details on government grant, buying/selling criteria, loan application, legal process, property handover, etc.
One property agent shared with me restrictions of foreigners buying properties and applying loans in Taiwan. Another agent told me that it’s still worth buying if sellers offer 15 percent discount or the property can generate a 4 percent return. Afterall, property prices will still go up in the long term. 真的假的?
If property prices have been climbing for the last ten years and have reached a historical high, given that Taiwan is a developed country, will the market slowdown continues for the next ten years? I don’t want my hard-earned money get stuck in a foreign country. I’d better think twice like any local buyer or investor. 不好意思哦!
Slight modifications for local use
Since coming back from Taipei, I have been practicing the four useful expressions inspired by Taiwan girls, much to the amusement of everyone.
To increase their usability at Singapore property new launches, I decided to modify the four phrases to adapt to the local context.

1. When admiring showflats in sales galleries

Original version: 好可爱哦! (It’s so cute!)
Local version: Wow! Nice!
2. When skeptical of what agents say
Original version:真的假的? (True or not?)
Local version: Are you kidding?
3. When decided to give it a miss
Original version: 不好意思哦! (I’m so sorry.)
Local version: Sorry, not for me!
4. After being cheated by a developer/agent/buyer/seller
Original version: 搞什么? (What’s going on?)
Local version: What the xxxx?
This article was first published at propertysoul.com

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Current Affairs

TJC issued 3rd POFMA order under Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC) was issued its third POFMA correction order on 5 October 2024 under the direction of Minister K Shanmugam for alleged falsehoods about death penalty processes. TJC has rejected the government’s claims, describing POFMA as a tool to suppress dissent.

Published

on

The Transformative Justice Collective (TJC), an advocacy group opposed to the death penalty, was issued its third Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) correction direction on 5 October 2024.

The correction was ordered by Minister for Home Affairs and Law, K Shanmugam, following TJC’s publication of what the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) alleges to be false information regarding Singapore’s death row procedures and the prosecution of drug trafficking cases.

These statements were made on TJC’s website and across its social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and X (formerly Twitter).

In addition to TJC, civil activist Kokila Annamalai was also issued a correction direction by the minister over posts she made on Facebook and X between 4 and 5 October 2024.

According to MHA, these posts echoed similar views on the death penalty and the legal procedures for drug-related offences, and contained statements that the ministry claims are false concerning the treatment of death row prisoners and the state’s legal responsibilities in drug trafficking cases.

MHA stated that the posts suggested the government schedules and stays executions arbitrarily, without due regard to legal processes, and that the state does not bear the burden of proving drug trafficking charges.

However, these alleged falsehoods are contested by MHA, which maintains that the government strictly follows legal procedures, scheduling executions only after all legal avenues have been exhausted, and that the state always carries the burden of proof in such cases.

In its official release, MHA emphasised, “The prosecution always bears the legal burden of proving its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and this applies to all criminal offences, including drug trafficking.”

It also pointed to an article on the government fact-checking site Factually to provide further clarification on the issues raised.

As a result of these allegations, both TJC and Annamalai are now required to post correction notices. TJC must display these corrections on its website and social media platforms, while Annamalai is required to carry similar notices on her Facebook and X posts.

TikTok has also been issued a targeted correction direction, requiring the platform to communicate the correction to all Singapore-based users who viewed the related TJC post.

In a statement following the issuance of the correction direction, TJC strongly rejected the government’s claims. The group criticised the POFMA law, calling it a “political weapon used to crush dissent,” and argued that the order was more about the exercise of state power than the pursuit of truth. “We have put up the Correction Directions not because we accept any of what the government asserts, but because of the grossly unjust terms of the POFMA law,” TJC stated.

TJC further argued that the government’s control over Singapore’s media landscape enables it to push pro-death penalty views without opposition. The group also stated that it would not engage in prolonged legal battles over the POFMA correction orders, opting to focus on its abolitionist work instead.

This marks the third time TJC has been subject to a POFMA correction direction in recent months.

The group was previously issued two orders in August 2024 for making similar statements concerning death row prisoners.

In its latest statement, MHA noted that despite being corrected previously, TJC had repeated what the ministry views as falsehoods.

MHA also criticised TJC for presenting the perspective of a convicted drug trafficker without acknowledging the harm caused to victims of drug abuse.

Annamalai, a prominent civil rights activist, is also known for her involvement in various social justice campaigns. She was charged in June 2024 for her participation in a pro-Palestinian procession near the Istana. Her posts, now subject to correction, contained information similar to those presented by TJC regarding death penalty procedures and drug-related cases.

POFMA, which was introduced in 2019, allows the government to issue correction directions when it deems falsehoods are being spread online.

Critics of the law argue that it can be used to suppress dissent, while the government asserts that it is a necessary tool for combating misinformation. The law has been frequently invoked against opposition politicians and activists.

As of October 2024, Minister K Shanmugam has issued 17 POFMA directions, more than any other minister. Shanmugam, who was instrumental in introducing POFMA, is followed by National Development Minister Desmond Lee, who has issued 10 POFMA directions.

Major media outlets, including The Straits Times, Channel News Asia, and Mothership, have covered the POFMA directions. However, as of the time of writing, none have included TJC’s response rejecting the government’s allegations.

Continue Reading

Current Affairs

Hotel Properties Limited suspends trading ahead of Ong Beng Seng’s court hearing

Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has halted trading ahead of his court appearance today (4 October). The announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at about 7.45am, citing a pending release of an announcement. Mr Ong faces one charge of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and another charge of obstruction of justice. He is due in court at 2.30pm.

Published

on

SINGAPORE: Hotel Properties Limited (HPL), the property and hotel developer co-founded by Mr Ong Beng Seng, has requested a trading halt ahead of the Singapore tycoon’s scheduled court appearance today (4 October) afternoon.

This announcement was made by HPL’s company secretary at approximately 7.45am, stating that the halt was due to a pending release of an announcement.

Mr Ong, who serves as HPL’s managing director and controlling shareholder, faces one charge under Section 165, accused of abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts, as well as one charge of obstruction of justice.

He is set to appear in court at 2.30pm on 4 October.

Ong’s charges stem from his involvement in a high-profile corruption case linked to former Singaporean transport minister S Iswaran.

The 80-year-old businessman was named in Iswaran’s initial graft charges earlier this year.

These charges alleged that Iswaran had corruptly received valuable gifts from Ong, including tickets to the 2022 Singapore Formula 1 Grand Prix, flights, and a hotel stay in Doha.

These gifts were allegedly provided to advance Ong’s business interests, particularly in securing contracts with the Singapore Tourism Board for the Singapore GP and the ABBA Voyage virtual concert.

Although Iswaran no longer faces the original corruption charges, the prosecution amended them to lesser charges under Section 165.

Iswaran pleaded guilty on 24 September, 2024, to four counts under this section, which covered over S$400,000 worth of gifts, including flight tickets, sports event access, and luxury items like whisky and wines.

Additionally, he faced one count of obstructing justice for repaying Ong for a Doha-Singapore flight shortly before the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) became involved.

On 3 October, Iswaran was sentenced to one year in jail by presiding judge Justice Vincent Hoong.

The prosecution had sought a sentence of six to seven months for all charges, while the defence had asked for a significantly reduced sentence of no more than eight weeks.

Ong, a Malaysian national based in Singapore, was arrested by CPIB in July 2023 and released on bail shortly thereafter. Although no charges were initially filed against him, Ong’s involvement in the case intensified following Iswaran’s guilty plea.

The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) had earlier indicated that it would soon make a decision regarding Ong’s legal standing, which has now led to the current charges.

According to the statement of facts read during Iswaran’s conviction, Ong’s case came to light as part of a broader investigation into his associates, which revealed Iswaran’s use of Ong’s private jet for a flight from Singapore to Doha in December 2022.

CPIB investigators uncovered the flight manifest and seized the document.

Upon learning that the flight records had been obtained, Ong contacted Iswaran, advising him to arrange for Singapore GP to bill him for the flight.

Iswaran subsequently paid Singapore GP S$5,700 for the Doha-Singapore business class flight in May 2023, forming the basis of his obstruction of justice charge.

Mr Ong is recognised as the figure who brought Formula One to Singapore in 2008, marking the first night race in the sport’s history.

He holds the rights to the Singapore Grand Prix. Iswaran was the chairman of the F1 steering committee and acted as the chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters concerning the race.

 

Continue Reading

Trending