town council logos Feb 2014By Andrew Loh
The People’s Action Party (PAP) has been attacking the opposition town council of the Workers’ Party (WP) these past weeks and months over the latter’s alleged “30 per cent” arrears in service and conservancy charges (S&C) owed by its residents.
The WP has been accused of being inept in running the town council, allowing such a high rate of arrears in S&C charges.
Ruling party Ministers have been leading the attack for weeks now, with their accusations geared towards trying to discredit the ability of the WP town council, and by extension those who run it.
But a check with past reports reveals that the WP does not seem to be the only one, or the first one, to have been owed such high amounts of S&C charges.
Back in 1987, the chairman of the Ang Mo Kio West Town Council, Lim Boon Heng, had “expressed his concern in the amount of arrears in his council”, according to a Straits Times report then.
The newspaper reported:

“He [Mr Lim] said one in 11, or 4,000 residents, owe his council. Although the number of residents in arrears have [sic] dropped slightly, the amount owed has increased, from $246,000 in December last year to $328,000 in April.”

Mr Lim recently expressed concerns about the WP situation.
“I’m personally quite disturbed,” Mr Lim said in November of the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council’s (AHPETC) S&C arrears. “To be in arrears by so much means that things are getting out of control. If it’s less than 10 per cent, you can probably manage. But once you go beyond that, you have to worry. And beyond 20 per cent, I think, is alarming.”
Well, perhaps Mr Lim was similarly alarmed when the town council in the PAP-run Bedok estate incurred a reported arrears sum which was 50 per cent of what it collected in a month.
The Bedok Town Council then was reported “to have the single largest figure of $500,000” owed to it in S&C arrears, The New Paper reported in October 1989.
“This figure is about half the $1.1 million collectible by the council every month,” the paper said.
It reported that “about 20 per cent of the account-holders” in Bedok were “responsible for the arrears of the council” that year.
But Bedok and Ang Mo Kio West town councils were not the only ones which had incurred such high S&C arrears.
The Bo Wen town council was also owed $397,200 in arrears in 1987, reported the Straits Times then.
bowen
In a 1989 New Paper report, several town councils were “owed $1m in charges”.
Besides Bedok Town Council with its hefty arrears, there was also Redhill Town Council, also run by the PAP.
The council then was “owed about $130,000.”
There was also the Cheng San Town Council which had “about $260,000 in arrears.”
“This is half the amount it collects every month,” The New Paper said. This is similar to the sum owed to the Bedok town council then.
Cheng San GRC then was, incidentally, led by Minister Lee Yock Suan, the father of PAP Minister of State Desmond Lee, who had been leading the attack on WP in recent weeks.
The other three PAP town councils which also had high S&C arrears were Bukit Batok (about $230,000), Tiong Bahru (about $200,000), and Ang Mo Kio West (about $175,000).
It seemed that this was the second time the Ang Mo Kio West Town Council had incurred such high S&C arrears, after the first case in 1987 as mentioned above.
Even in 2004, town councils – the majority of which were run by the PAP – were owed S&C as much as $24 million, as this report by TODAY highlighted, although it did not give the breakdown owed to individual town councils.
PAPTCs SCC
So, the question is: Are S&C arrears something out of the ordinary? From these past news reports, it appears that even PAP town councils had incurred rather large S&C arrears as well, with some incurring arrears rate which appears to be rather substantial amounts.
Is the PAP playing politics here, picking a fight with the WP town council over S&C arrears, while knowing full well that its own PAP town councils had also incurred rather significant amount of arrears in the past, some as high as 50 per cent of what a town council collects every month?
Read also: “PAP town council “incurred huge deficit” in 1997“.
Town councils owed charges - TNP 11Oct1989 NLB archivesPenalty late payments - ST 23Jun1987 NLB archives
 

Subscribe
Notify of
44 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

The unknown side of Singapore

Rockerchick takes her camera round S’pore and “found many impoverished people.”

Changes to Cabinet and other appointments

The Prime Minister will make the following changes to Cabinet and other…

MOM: Job vacancies declined despite strongest employment growth in 5 years

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) released a labour market report on Thursday…

【选举】陈振声反驳没“空头支票” 称行动党“需为国人负责”

行动党两名原部长:陈振声和英兰妮称,行动党并没有“为所欲为的口头支票”,须为国人负责。 他们是针对工人党盛港集选区候选人林志蔚,于周三(7月1日)的电视直播辩论中,促请我国选民投票给工人党,并拒绝行动党“口头支票”一说,这么表示。 陈振声在接受《海峡时报》采访时指出,这并非本届大选的正确描述,并补充行动党会对选民、对人民的福祉负责。“在治理方面,行动党始终为人民负责,无论是选举(时期)与否。” “我不认为有空白支票这回事,就好像行动党可以不负责地做任何事情。我不认为这是正确的描述。我们所做的每一件事、每一个脚步,都要为新加坡人、他们的福祉和他们的安宁生活负责,我们必须为国家的持续发展负责。” 陈振声与英兰妮,以及行动党新人陈圣辉及蔡瑞隆,在丹戎巴葛集选区上阵。 林志蔚于周三的辩论上指出,行动党辩称选举其实是赋予他们权利,让国家摆脱次困境,而且他们需要被委托才能这么做。“事实上,在选举结束前,行动党可能就已有了这个权利……我们不是否认行动党已经被授权,而是否认他们可能会为所欲为。” 以非选区议员制度进行牵制 英兰妮同时也引述非选区议员的存在,来反驳林志蔚的说法:“行动党永远没有空白支票,因为不管发生什么事情,宪法保证了至少有12个反对议席”。 她补充道,非选区议员具有和议员一样的投票权,即表示他们可以对宪法修正案、补助和金钱法案,以及信任票等课题上都有投票权。 我国在1984年采用非选区议员制度,以确保国会内拥有最少人数的反对党成员,而在大选中获得最高票数的反对派候选人将可成为非选区议员。非选区议员制度在2016年经过修改,被赋予更多权力,并从原本的九人增加到12人。 这12人中可以包括胜选议员或非选区议员。这也表示,若胜选的反对党议员超过12人,那么就不会有非选区议员的席位。 英兰妮随后在脸书上帖文补充道,虽然保证了反对党议席,却不能保证“拥有明确授权的强而有力政府,去执行任务以度过难关”。“这些(选择)都在选民的手中。”…