By Property Soul
Just came back after spending five days in Hong Kong. During the daytime, we didn’t go to any popular sightseeing place except meeting up with friends and relatives. In the evenings, we went back to the hotel to watch the news on TV about the Occupy Central pro-democracy movement.
A visit to the occupied zone
With clashes between the police and protesters, we had to avoid passing by the Mongkok area. The original protest site in Admiralty was occupied by aggressive leaders of the Umbrella Revolution. To get a glimpse of the Occupy Central supporters, we decided to pay a visit to the peaceful protest zone in Causeway Bay.
occupy_central2Causeway Bay was still bustling as usual even without Chinese tourists flocking there. We managed to find the closed-off area at Yee Wo Street. Both sides of the road were decorated by posters with slogans written in different languages. There were not many tents there but they were set up neatly in one area. The protesters had built many facilities, including library, study centre and discussion area.
In the early evening, the occupied part of the road was empty like a ghost town, save for a few people chatting on the chairs. The busy pavements on both sides of the road was a big contrast – with people hurrying home, meeting up with friends, or heading for the big sale at SOGO.
Confession of a protester
The camping site reminded me of a confession from an Occupy Central supporter on facebook:

I am a typical boy from public housing. My parents have high hopes on their only child. They hope that getting a good education for me can drag us out of poverty …
In September, I didn’t join other tertiary students to boycott classes. I am worried about my education and results. I don’t want to disappoint my family. If I can’t graduate, I can’t find a job. I don’t want my parents to be in debts with my college grant loan. I don’t want to see our dream of upward mobility dashed.
After the teargas incident on September 28, I decided to come out after some thinking. I am scared. But I cannot pretend that I don’t see anything. This society is really terrible with developer hegemony (monopoly/domination) and serious disparity between the rich and the poor.
On the day I decided to go, I had done my calculations. I would be fortunate to earn a salary of HK$17,000 (S$2,800) from my first job after graduation. But when I thought about paying the grant loan and supporting my retiring parents … I might have to supplement my income with part-time tuitions. However, I couldn’t afford to buy myself insurance, let alone buying a property.
… No matter how hard I try, even if I work 24 hours a day, my family will never get out of poverty. History tells me that this is not an individual’s problem. It is the system that has problems.

Our next generation is a totally different generation
My parents are baby boomers whose main concern was to fulfill the basic needs of everyday life.
I belong to the Generation X who were taught from young to follow rules – study well, get a good job, and work hard to improve our lives. We don’t talk about dreams. It is a luxury. We talk about increment, promotion, upgrade and social status.
occupy_central3We learn from the Occupy Central that Generation Y are not easily contented with just allowances, peers, social media, computer games or high-tech gadgets.
Our Generation Y grew up with everything well provided. They don’t have to sacrifice for the sake of the family. When they know that even if they work equally hard, they will never match their parents’ achievement, why will they still toil day and night at a workplace they don’t really like?
They are free to chase their dreams – to fight for what they think is right or, to live a life they truly want. They are individualistic, entitled and vain. They like to break rules and are not ready to compromise.
What will Generation Z become?
As we strolled past the protest zone in Causeway Bay, I wondered what the future holds for Generation Z. I ended up having the following conversation with my nine-year-old.
Me: Do you think it is right for Singapore students to ‘Occupy Starbucks’? Why?
Child: No. Because they should go home to do their homework and revisions. Other people cannot sit if they occupy the seats the whole day.
Me: Do you think it is right for Hong Kong students to Occupy Central? Why?
Child: No. Because these are public areas. It is inconvenient for others.
Me: If one day you find injustice in the society, what will you do?
Child: Don’t know.
Me: Will you sit in the coffee shop and complain?
Child: Mommy, that’s what old uncles do.
Me: Will you sit in front of the computer and send hate comments or attack someone under an anonymous identity?
Child: No. I am not a coward.
Me: Will you find who’s responsible, meet the person face-to-face, and say exactly what you think?
Child: But I am scared.
Me: If one day, even though you have a well-paying job after you graduate, you still cannot afford to buy an HDB flat, and you can’t get married and start your family, what will you do?
Child: Then I won’t get married. We will stay with you and daddy. Me and my sister too.
It seems that my efforts of teaching the kids to develop their independent thinking, to be independent and fend for themselves are all going down the drain …
 This article is first published at propertysoul.com. (All images property of propertysoul.com)

Subscribe
Notify of
13 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

票箱若遗失可以不计? 选举修法令人起疑

新加坡民主党于昨日发文告警示民众,选举部近期提呈不寻常的选举法修改条例,充满疑点。 其中一项修法建议,规定在前往计票中心前,如已封箱的投票箱已损毁获遗失,可以不计其选票。除非选举官认为有关投票站的票数足以左右最终结果,可以重新召开新一轮投票。 有关修改选举法的动议,在本月10日通过一读。 民主党质问,为何在这个时节点提出这项修改?选举部是否能向选民解释,过去有无发生过票箱被毁获不见的事件? 该党称,过去都不曾发生类似案例,但政府却无法给出合理解释,为何要修改此规章。 在投票站直接计票 如果选举部关系票箱遗失的问题,最好的办法,就是在投票时间结束后,直接在投票站清算该站的选票总数。 “在其他国家都这么做。投票结束后,选举官就宣布开箱,在各政党候选人、代表乃至民众的在场见证下,当场唱票。” 算票结束后,选举官必须当场宣布该投票站的票数,记录并交给选举部。现今资讯工艺发达,如此计票过程肯定可以有效、迅速且透明地进行。只有在所有投票站都算好票,并总和所有投票站成绩后,才正式公布最后结果。 如此,就能解决行动党所谓担心票箱在运送到计票中心的过程中,损毁或不见的担忧。 “如果行动党政府希望打造公平透明的选举制度,首先应该让选举部从总理署的管辖下独立出来,并在独立的选举委员会监督下运作。” 文告指出,只要选举部仍在总理署的掌控下,对于选举法的任何改动,都很难让新加坡人信服。民主党呼吁行动党政府停止忽悠人民,真诚打造一个自由、公平和透明的选举制度。…

新保集团和IHiS被罚100万元 二职员被炒 总裁等高层仅被罚款

个人资料保护委员会,于今日宣布重罚综合保健信息系统公司(IHiS)和新保集团,共被罚款100万元,必须在30天内付清。这也是该委会迄今为止罚金额最高的罚款。 IHiS因未采取足够安全措施保护病患个人资料,而遭罚款75万元。 新保集团则因负责人员对事故反应程序不熟悉、太过依赖IHiS公司,被罚25万元。 佘林发:黄瑞莲等高层愿受罚款处分 至于新保集团董事会主席佘林发则表示,该集团领导层,包括总裁黄瑞莲都自愿接受被罚款。 他指出,病患的安全和数据隐私理应是该集团的首要考量,对于事故担起责任,并对受影响病患道歉。 不过,他并未透露新保集团高层的罚款金额。 根据个资保护委会的文告,去年发生的新保集团网袭事件历来最严重,导致约150万名病人的个人资料被盗,还有约16万人的门诊配药记录被泄露,当中包括总理李显龙与数名部长的记录。事件爆发后,该委会也收到许多民间投诉。 IHiS二职员被开除 IHiS的一名技术主管,以及一名保安事故应变经理将被开除。该公司称有关经理已多次接获职员通报,却没采取有效行动,两名职员的主管也被罚款。 公司的五名高级管理人员包括总裁连水木,需承担集体责任,并支付显著的罚款额。 一名负责该系统的集群信息安全官,因没有遵守通报程序将被降职。