tcsIf you thought the Workers’ Party’s Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPEC) is the first or the only town council to have ever run into a deficit, you would have to think again.
Several People’s Action Party (PAP) town councils have also run into the red over the years.
In fact, AHPETC’s deficit may not even be the biggest one either.
For example, the Straits Times reported in July 1997 that a People’s Action Party (PAP) town council had “incurred a huge deficit”.
But more of that later.
First, let’s take a little walk down memory lane, and start from whence the concept of the town council was introduced.
And here, we need to visit Ang Mo Kio – you will see why in a bit.
According to the Town Councils website:

“After pilot testing the concept of Town Councils in Ang Mo Kio Town, the first 3 Town Councils (namely Ang Mo Kio South, Ang Mo Kio West and Cheng San Town Councils) were gazetted and formed in 1989.
“Subsequently, Town Councils were introduced island-wide over 3 phases, from mid 1989 to mid 1991. Today, there are 16 Town Councils managing the HDB housing estates in Singapore.”

So the concept of the town council was tested out in Ang Mo Kio – and almost immediately, it ran into problems.
One of the town councils ended the year with – yes, you’ve guessed it – a deficit.
East Coast 1
In 1987, the Ang Mo Kio East Town Council “ran a deficit of $15,000”, according to a Straits Times’ report in 1988 (above), because of the costs of maintaining a public garden.
[*We are not sure if this town council was Ang Mo Kio East Town Council (as reported by the paper) or Ang Mo Kio West Town Council (as indicated by the National Archives).] The town council was so upset by the lack of funds needed to maintain the garden that it was “thinking of washing their hands of this responsibility.”
But Ang Mo Kio East Town Council wasn’t the only one which ran into financial trouble.
The other pilot council – the Ang Mo Kio South Town Council – also had problems maintaining another garden – this time at Avenue 6 of the estate apparently.
The situation was so bad that the estate manager projected the council would go into a deficit of $20,000.
AMKsouth
Fast forward to the 1990s and another two town councils, including a PAP one, ended the year in the red, according to a New Paper report titled, “Lost money”.
First there was the PAP’s Hong Kah GRC in 1995, with an “operating shortfall of $1 million”, along with Potong Pasir SMC with an “operating deficit of $584,000.”
Here is the report in full:
Hong Kah  TNP
Strangely, the report seemed to have ignored the earlier Straits Times report of the two town councils in Ang Mo Kio which also went into deficits by referring to Potong Pasir and Hong Kah as the first town councils to go into deficits.
In 1996, the three Singapore Democratic Party’s town councils –  Nee Soon Central, Bukit Gombak, and Potong Pasir – were also in the red.
In 1997, several PAP town councils were also in danger of joining the red queue. These were:

  1. Pasir Ris Town Council which “estimates an operating deficit of $3,824 million” [sic]
  2. Aljunied Town Council which “projects a shortfall of $988,000”; and
  3. Bukit Timah Town Council which expected to be in deficit by $964,000.

TCs in the red
We could not get confirmation of whether Aljunied Town Council and Bukit Timah Town Council had eventually crossed into the red.
However, Pasir Ris Town Council seemed to have indeed incurred a deficit.
This seems to be confirmed by a report in the Straits Times 3 days later, on 26 July 1997, some three days after the one in The New Paper which warned that it might go into deficit.
The Straits Times’ report said it had received a “note” from a “resident” who “spring” to the defence of the town council.
The “resident” was “commenting on an ST article earlier this week showing that Pasir Ris Town Council had incurred a huge deficit.”
We have been unable to determine how big was this “huge deficit” reported by the paper. In any case, it didn’t seem to matter to a resident.
The Straits Times said the note writer, Mr Chia Wenn Teck, had “gushed” when he wrote:

“I would like non-Pasir Ris readers to be aware that the MPs here have made a tremendous effort to make the town a more pleasant place to live in and, to a large extent, they have succeeded.
“I am happy to be staying in Pasir Ris and I believe many of my neighbours feel the same.”
Pasir Ris ST

Mr Chia’s confidence in his MPs are a stark contrast to that of former Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office, Lim Boon Heng, who recently said of the AHPETC deficit:

“And if they can’t even manage a simple thing like a town council, then it begs the big question: If you put them in charge of the country, what will be the outcome?”

One must wonder if Mr Lim, who entered politics in 1980, had said or felt the same about the PAP MPs whose town councils had similarly gone into the red over the years.
Some of these MPs were or have even become ministers leading the country today.
So, a town council going into deficit is nothing new.
Apparently, at least four PAP town councils (Ang Mo Kio East, Ang Mo Kio South, Pasir Ris and Hong Kah), and three opposition town councils (Potong Pasir, Nee Soon Central and Bukit Gombak) have experienced such low points through the years.
There were also several other PAP town councils which came close and were in danger of falling into deficit – saved at times only by raising the service and conservancy fees residents had to pay.
One can only wonder then why the PAP is making such a big fuss over AHPETC’s situation, especially when all town councils, even today, run deficits which only turn into surpluses after receiving government grants. (See here: “Desmond Lee, all town councils run deficits“.)
This is especially so when one of the PAP’s former MPs was rather nonchalant about the prospect of his town council falling into deficit.
“This is not a big problem,” said Lew Syn Pau in a Straits Times report in October 1996, titled, “In danger of running into the red”, which highlighted that Mr Lew’s town council “may run into the red in the year 2002.”

“It is a question of cash flow management. Although we see the deficit here in the projection, nearer the time, we will manage the flow properly.”
holland lew

And, by the way, Pasir Ris Town Council which “incurred a huge deficit” is still functioning today under the PAP and the GRC is in fact led by Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean, who had entered politics in 1992 and became an MP in Pasir Ris after the January 1997 general election.
Mr Teo is of course, one of those “in charge of the country” today, as Mr Lim put it.

Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Another Government Investment Goes Belly Up!

~ By: Kumaran Pillai ~ Ireland’s former state telecom operator eircom applied…

力挺女佣巴蒂 狠批廖氏家族 樟宜机场脸书成网民炮轰区

女佣巴蒂被指偷窃案,上周获高庭法官翻案,惟此案仍在坊间热议不断,樟宜机场集团主席廖文良父子成为众矢之的,网民纷纷在樟宜机场集团的脸书专页上轰炸,甚至连交易广告帖子也不放过,有者要求樟宜机场集团更换主席。 46岁的印尼籍女佣巴蒂·莉雅妮(Parti Liyani)曾在廖文良家中帮佣近九年,于2016年10月28日被开除后,遭前雇主父子报警指控偷走逾五万元的财物,于2016年12月2日被逮捕。为了配合调查,巴蒂滞留在我国将近四年,因无法工作而被迫居住在由情义之家所经营的收容所内,三餐都需依靠他人帮助。 国家法院于2019年3月审判巴蒂罪名成立,需要坐牢两年两个月,而在本月4日,高庭推翻了国家法院的判决,改判巴蒂无罪。高庭法官陈成安指出,廖文良家族动机不良,突然解雇女佣后就立刻报警指物件失窃,有理由相信是为了阻止女佣到人力部求助。而廖文良儿子廖启龙更被法官点名为“不诚实的控方证人”,表示自己的女性衣物失窃,还有女装癖,说辞令人难以相信。 自巴蒂获得无罪开释后,网上就充满了对巴蒂的支持,非营利组织甚至在一天内就成功为巴蒂筹获2万8000元。 另一方面,廖文良一家也成为网民炮轰的对象,纷纷在社交媒体上炮轰,而非常明显的,樟宜机场的脸书页面成为了网民宣泄的地方,甚至在帖文评论区发出了和帖文内容无关,专门针对樟宜机场主席的言论。 甚至在该脸书页面发布有关有奖竞赛和集团内员工的暖心故事帖文上,也不乏网民对廖氏家族的尖锐评论。

Three Singaporeans aged 70, 80, and 90 dies from COVID-19 complications; COVID-19 death toll in August reaches 18

The Ministry of Health (MOH) in its daily update on Friday (27…

CPF Minimum Sum to be increased to $155,000 from July 2014

Ministry of Manpower (MOM) has just announced that the minimum sum that…