Photo: Khaw Boon Wan Facebook page
Photo: Khaw Boon Wan Facebook page
Photo: Khaw Boon Wan Facebook page
Controversial posting by Minister Khaw Boon Wan on joint-exercise
A Facebook posting by the Minister of National Development, Khaw Boon Wan, has come under fire from members of the public for being insensitive.
On Tuesday, Mr Khaw made a posting titled, “Joint exercise with Police, SCDF & foreign worker ambassadors”.
The post was accompanied by eight photographs of the joint exercise which apparently showed security personnel and “foreign worker ambassadors” simulating a situation of unrest.
Mr Khaw wrote in the post:

“We have a few foreign workers’ dormitories. What if some quarrels erupt, leading to fights or worse? These are possible scenarios, given the concentration of foreign workers in one locality. Little India riot was an extreme case, but minor scale fights could happen locally. To test our response capability, the Police, the SCDF, the dorms operators and our grassroots organisations organised a simulation exercise recently. It was a useful way to network up the various agencies, and spread preventive messages. Prevention is always better than cure.”

Photo: Khaw Boon Wan Facebook page
Photo: Khaw Boon Wan Facebook page
The posting immediately drew concerns and criticisms from the public for being insensitive, and some also criticised the joint exercise itself as being racist.
Ms Feng Yi Hi was one of the first to react to Mr Khaw’s post.
“Sir, I understand the purpose of such an exercise, but I cannot help but feel disturbed by the racial undertones,” she said. “Riots can be started by anyone regardless of their ethnicity. Positing Indian foreign workers as the next group of rioters or troublemakers does not paint racial minority groups in a positive light but only perpetuates existing stereotypes which are inimical to the development of a harmonious society. My suggestion is that ‘rioters’ in future such exercises (if any) must also consist of people of other ethnic groups. I hope the organizers can take this into consideration. Thank you.”
Mr Yee Kai also raised his concerns about the racial overtones of the post.
“Minister, the worst riots in the history of our nation were due to racial issues,” Mr Yee said. “Do we to this date still stimulate exercises based on racial conflicts putting two major racial groups fighting against each other with the civil defense and the police coming in to contain the situation under the purview of ‘prevention is better than cure’ ? Absolutely not. I fail to see how stimulating based on a particular racial group is relevant. There are so many other resources under the different ministries to try and understand their issues and to give them avenues to air their grievances – why not employ these resources?”
Ms Reena Melanie Mohan agreed that the joint exercise “seems very racist.”
“I can’t believe such an exercise can be done at this time and age. What was the reason for a particular racial group to be signalled out? And putting up pictures isn’t helping. What were you trying to educate the public?”
Mr Balaji Narasimhan said, “You gotta be kidding me… Why on earth would you want to put pictures of this?”
Other criticisms on Mr Khaw’s page include:

“One of the most ridiculous things I’ve seen today. Out of all possible scenarios, you chose this one? Done in poor taste.”
“Minister, do you think THIS is a good idea? On the one hand you say that not all foreign workers engage in the sort of actions we saw last Dec. On the other hand, the SPF and you engage in this sort of activity that betrays a level of racism that only serves to reinforce stereotypes and utterly undermines your efforts in the former. Talk about mixed signals!”
“Reenacting foreign workers being detained and arrested sounds pretty disgraceful to me. Not to mention RACIST. You should remove this post before more bad PR comes your way.”

Mr Jolovan Wham, who is also the executive director of the Humanitarian Organisation for Migration Economics (HOME), an NGO which provides aid to foreign workers, disagreed with the use of foreign workers in the exercise.
“Not only are we content to push them to the margins with our policies, we are also happy to stereotype them,” he said on Mr Khaw’s page. “We don’t offer them adequate social support and services, and yet we are quick to point our fingers at them when things go wrong. Foreign workers are the builders of our nation. They don’t have any citizen benefits. The least we should do is accord them some basic dignity and respect.”

Photo: Khaw Boon Wan Facebook page
Photo: Khaw Boon Wan Facebook page
Mr Michael Cyssel Wee said that while few people would doubt the usefulness of conducting riot simulation exercises from time to time, the use of real foreign workers “as props” in the exercise “is dehumanising.”
This is even more so “combined with the minister’s preface, ‘We have a few foreign workers’ dormitories, What if some quarrels erupt, leading to fights or worse?’, he said.
“[It] leads to an unhelpful stereotyping of a largely unintegrated group in society. It also betrays a highly reductive view, one that risks making a mockery of the issues surrounding it.”
Mr Wee said “foreign workers have helped to physically build so much of our nation.”
“Do we really treat them as builders, with the full dignity of human persons, or do we merely see them as building tools — tools that can injure us if we do not wield them properly, or if we do not keep a tight grip on them?
“Mr Khaw Boon Wan, will you apologise in Parliament for this disappointing gaffe? Will the Ministry of Home Affairs care to explain how the conduct of this exercise got approved?”

Subscribe
Notify of
14 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

忧生态遭破坏居民发起联署护林 徐顺全冀反思居住环境素质

位于武吉巴督2道和5道之间的一片丛林(Bukit Batok Hillside Park),可能将被清空以作为发展住宅区用途,担忧生态多样性和物种栖息地遭破坏,一名当地居民Jimmy Tan发起联署,呼吁当局对这片树林高抬贵手。 民主党秘书长徐顺全,也偕同Jimmy Tan走进树林探访,他关注清空树林可能带来的损失,以及随发展化对人口、生活环境和生态的影响,更喊话武吉巴督议员穆仁理,应联署赞同保住树林。 截至今晚(27日)9时许,联署人数已经突破5千人。 据了解,建屋发展局今年较早时发布环境评估报告,武吉巴督森林区共有多达81个物种,包括五种受威胁的鸟类,包括:凤头鹰雕以及锈胸杜鹃,也可能有马来穿山甲或猫猴。 另外,有74种植物,其中10种属于濒危。 这片面积达17公顷的森林,目前已有一半被清除,以建造West Scape…

Law Minister’s veiled threat to the electorate?

by: Rizal Hamid/ Commenting on the roles and limitations of the President…

“法律不问琐事”? 范国瀚陈两裕    因脸书贴文被控藐视法庭

法律有句名言“法律不问琐事”(拉丁语:de minimis non curat lex),意即法律不过问对社会、他人财产、性命安危构成威胁和损害的事项。不过,在我国就有社运人士,却因为一则只有33个赞的脸书贴文招惹官司,在司法(保护)法令下,被提控藐视法庭罪。 总检察署高级政府律师在本月17日,在针对社运份子范国瀚和民主党副主席陈两裕的公开审讯时,认为脸书贴文是否构成藐视法庭,取决于一般民众如何诠释该贴文内容,而不是依据作者原意图。 范国瀚是在今年4月,于脸书的贴文称,马来西亚法庭处理政治个案比新加坡司法更独立,而被总检察署指控藐视法庭。有关贴文也转载新闻:“《当今大马》挑战反假新闻法违宪”。 随后,新加坡民主党党要陈两裕在脸书为范国瀚抱不平,指出总检察署的举措,更加证实范国瀚的批评所言不虚。结果也同样被控藐视法庭罪。不过,至今两人都仍未撤下被指藐视法庭的贴文。 2016年司法(保护)法令自去年10月生效,上述两人“抢了头香”,成为该法令生效以来首两位被指控藐视法庭的个案。 高级政府律师Francis Ng声明,范国瀚“没有可想象的理据”去挑出新加坡司法独立性的问题,范的言论等同向一般民众影射在马国进行的宪法挑战,若发生在新加坡必然败诉,是因为这里缺乏司法独立性。 “范国瀚是在质疑新加坡司法系统的公正与廉洁度。”…

司徒国辉赞毕丹星 “当好政治家不需百万薪酬”

本地食评家司徒国辉这次不谈美食,赞扬刚刚获委国会反对党领袖的毕丹星,获得加薪后就立即宣布把薪酬的一半回馈社群。 “他很清楚要当好政治家,不需要有百万元(薪酬),有些人还嘲讽他在作秀,似乎政治人物做好事或计划就该静静不说。” 毕丹星前日表示要把附加的国会反对党领袖薪酬的一半,用在工人党选区扶助低收入居民和其他慈善用途。这相当于9万6000元。 与此同时,司徒国辉也赞许另一位社运份子吴家和,他刚在本届选举参选败选,但很快就恢复了多年来一直持续的社区工作,探访流离失所和孤苦伶仃的民众。 他收集来自志愿者和支持者的食物和资源,挨家逐户拜访,交给有需要的人士。 司徒国辉表示,自己也曾跟随吴家和一起去探访民情,不过走了四五个楼层就投降了,但是吴家和还能每周坚持下去。而他自己则只是略尽绵力,捐些款项和收集来自露天熟食中心Makansutra Gluttons Bay小贩的热食,供弱势群体食用。 吴家和和其他人民之声团队在白沙-榜鹅集选区对垒张志贤领军的团队,惟仅得票12.18巴仙,失按柜金。迄今吴家和还在筹募按柜金的款项。