Wednesday, 27 September 2023

We are shifting our daily news to Gutzy.Asia Support us there!

$1,000,000 for a part-time MP – “realistic” and “correct”?

PM Lee satellite interview
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in an interview on Beijing Satellite TV.
Forget about the ministers. We all know they are the highest-paid public officers in the world. Singapore’s ministers occupy probably the top 10 to 15 positions on such a list.
Even a junior minister would earn more than many other head of states.
So, it is with quite some disbelief that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, once again, defended the salaries of government officers.
“In principle, we are not talking about high salaries, what we want are realistic and correct salaries,” he said in an interview with a Chinese television outlet.
Well, if your principle results in highly skewed salaries for public servants (yes, servants), then surely something is terribly wrong.
And while we may argue about how our ministers are worth their multi-million dollar salaries because they have much to do, what about the other public officers – namely the Members of Parliament (MP).
Let’s break it down into simple terms.
An MP is now paid S$16,000 a month.
That means a total of S$192,000 per year.
A parliamentary term lasts five years.
This means an MP would be paid (S$192,000 x 5) = S$960,000.
Now, in Singapore, an MP is also allowed to hold on to his own day job (unless he is a minister).
What this means is that his MP work is essentially a part-time job.
bykfulltimeIndeed, there is only a handful of MPs who have chosen to do it full-time, such as Baey Yam Keng, Tin Pei Ling, Foo Mee Har and the opposition Workers’ Party MPs, such as Chen Show Mao and Pritam Singh..
Now, how is paying almost S$1,000,000 to an MP for what is essentially a part-time job “realistic” and “correct”?
As some have sad, it is indeed the best paid part-time job in the world, probably!
And certainly better-paid than many full-time jobs too.
Yet, here we are negotiating for “more than a year” on whether our security guards could have their pay raised by S$300, so that they could earn S$1,100 per month.
The NTUC happily announced recently that negotiations with employers have succeeded somewhat – that security guards will be paid at least S$1,100.
But there is a catch.
The pay rise will take place only two years later.
Yet, here is the great affective divide, and one of the reasons why the PAP Government is increasingly and dangerously out of touch.
What the security guards will earn in a month in two years’ time will not even be one day’s worth of the Prime Minister’s salary.
In other words, what the PM is paid in one day (S$6,000) will take the security guard about 6 months to earn.
Is this chasm “realistic” and “correct”?
Some have argued that it is right for the PM to be earning such amounts of money since he is like a chief executive officer of a company.
Those who make such an argument fails to see a vital point.
That being a leader of a nation is completely and utterly different from that of being a CEO.
A leader of a nation must have that moral authority for him to lead. This authority is eroded when he pays himself an amount which is astronomical to the average person.
In effect, when you are paid $6,000 a day, you cannot but lose touch with the common man and woman, the very people from whom you derive your moral authority.
It is what, one suspects, former head of the Civil Service Ngiam Tong Dow, was alluding to, when he said things started “to go downhill” when we began to pay ministers such astronomical salaries.
Moral authority is important for it also engenders respect and even deference, along with faith and trust in leadership.
These are vital things in order for leaders to lead a nation.
“[It is] wrong to think that a bigger pay would undermine the moral authority of the government,” Minister in charge of the Civil Service, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean said in April 2007 during the debate on increasing civil servants’ pay.
DPM Teo was wrong – and the government only realised this in 2011, when the people became so incensed that they cast their votes against the party during the elections.
So, the government learnt the lesson the hard way.
It is no surprise that immediately after the results of the elections, PM Lee called for a review of ministers salaries – the very first thing he did after the elections.
And swiftly, perhaps on the realisation of how upset Singaporeans were with the issue, Mr Lee convened the review panel just two weeks after the election results.
And less than a year later, in January 2012, the review committee recommended salaries be slashed.
Still, it leaves our ministers hogging the top of the list of best-paid in the world.
And this latest remark by PM Lee does not help things. It raises question of his moral authority to speak on the issue, and if he should be the one to decide whether a salary is “realistic” and “correct”, given that he is a beneficiary of such a decision.
There is no justification for such a huge salary gap between those in leadership and those they lead.
There certainly is no justification to pay any public official a million dollars for working part-time for five years.
How is that “realistic” and “correct”?
And perhaps this proves the point precisely – that those who think such salaries are “realistic” and “correct” are probably saying so from the comfort of the ivory tower.

Notify of
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Latest posts

Election surprises and certainties: Dissecting Tharman’s presidential win

In the 2023 Presidential Election, Mr. Tharman Shanmugaratnam secured a stunning 70.4% landslide victory, surprising many, including himself. Despite expectations that TKL would win the opposition votes, voters from both camps showed a preference for Tharman's charisma and perceived competency. As Singapore reflects on the outcome, questions arise about the election's fairness and the real implications of Tharman's dominant win.

Volunteer as a Polling and Counting Agent for Singapore’s 2023 Presidential Election

For the upcoming Singapore Presidential Election on 1st September, members of the civil society have spearheaded an initiative to strengthen our democratic fabric. We invite committed individuals to join us as Polling and Counting Agents, standing together for a transparent, fair, and just election. This vote counting exercise, organized by members of civil society, is not specifically in support of Mr Tan Kin Lian, a candidate in the upcoming Presidential Election. It's an exercise in active citizenry. Nonetheless, Mr Tan endorses this initiative, which hinges on his candidacy, championing transparency, and has given permission for the results to be shared publicly.

Reflections from the Centenary: The Legacy of LKY and Singapore’s Future

Gilbert Goh reflects on the LKY centenary event: an inspiring showcase of a leader's global legacy juxtaposed against current challenges, urging Singapore to continue its path of progress.

Lim Tean advocates for Tan Kin Lian: A visionary leader for Singapore’s Presidency

In his speech at Mr Tan Kin Lian's launch of his presidential bid, Mr Lim Tean passionately championed the need for a truly Independent President. Highlighting Mr Tan Kin Lian's unique credentials and genuine concern for the wellbeing of Singaporeans, the Peoples Voice leader emphasized the pressing challenges of rising living costs and job insecurities faced by the public. Mr Lim depicted Mr Tan Kin Lian as a beacon of hope for the nation, advocating for a leader who genuinely understands and represents the people’s aspirations.

Tan Jee Say endorses Tan Kin Lian for President: A courageous, genuine, and humble...

In advocating for a truly representative leader, Tan Jee Say underscored Tan Kin Lian's humility, courage, and genuine dedication. Highlighting the pressing need for restored public trust and effective independence, Tan Jee Say emphasized that Tan Kin Lian, as the 'People's President', would bring back hope to Singaporeans and champion true democracy

Tan Kin Lian’s pledge: Rekindling unity and charting a vigorous future for Singapore

In the press conference to announce his bid for the Singapore presidency, Tan Kin Lian emphasizes safeguarding Singapore's reserves and strengthening public service integrity. Drawing on his 30-year leadership at NTUC Income, he envisions a future with affordable living, accessible housing, and job stability, pledging collaboration with the government for a united nation.

Strengthening Singapore’s political foundations: A call to action by Leong Mun Wai on Singapore’s...

Leong Mun Wai urges Singaporeans to strengthen political checks and balances, emphasizing, 'The best is yet to be for Singapore if we dare to make the right decision in upcoming elections.

Trending posts