Jover Chew, boss of Mobile Air
Jover Chew, boss of Mobile Air
Jover Chew, boss of Mobile Air
The Singapore Police have confirmed that “police reports have been lodged against Mobile Air”, the shop at Sim Lim Square which has been in the news this past week for allegedly unfair and dishonest sales tactics.
The authorities also disclosed that it is looking into a complaint of intentional harassment at the shop which is located at unit #01-41 at the electronics shopping centre.
The offence, classified under the Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act, carries a maximum fine of S$5,000.
It is unclear what these police reports are exactly about, although there have been more news reports of Mobile Air engaging in allegedly dishonest sales behaviour towards its customers since it first emerged that it had purportedly scammed a Vietnamese tourist of an iPhone deal last week.
According to the Consumers’ Association of Singapore (CASE), it has so far received 25 complaints from the public about Mobile Air in the months from August to October.
CASE has blacklisted about 10 shops at Sim Lim Square and has posted a list of them at the shopping mall itself.
CASE list
On Friday, a reporter with The New Paper (TNP) said that the owner of Mobile Air, Jover Chew, had forwarded the calls he received to her on Wednesday.
“I received 201 phone calls in five hours,” Elizabeth Law said in the paper.
She wrote:

“Netizens felt the authorities were not doing enough about rogue traders at Sim Lim Square and took their own form of citizen justice on Mr Chew, who has become the face of the “Sim Lim saga”.
“Satirical group SMRT Ltd (Feedback) posted his personal details on its Facebook page, asking fans to call him.
“This was how I ended up receiving all their calls when Mr Chew diverted them to my phone.
“It was awful.”

Meanwhile, the Sim Lim management council said on Friday that it is hoping for a change in the law so that it will be able to institute their own by-laws to allow them to deal with errant tenants.
Sim Lim Square has about 480 shops which are owned by a few hundred landlords, the Straits Times reported.
“Most rental agreements are negotiated between landlords and tenants, and the management is currently not able to kick out recalcitrant shops,” the newspaper said.
If the management is allowed, by law, to introduce a by-law to terminate the tenancy agreements of unscrupulous retailers, it will help them deal more effectively with the problem of a few errant retailers which the management says have tarnished the reputation of the mall.
Mr Sunny Chew, the council’s assistant secretary, said: “We need the authorities to take action so that we can weed out these shops. In the last five years, we have not been able to find a permanent solution.”
On Thursday, CASE’s president, Member of Parliament Lim Biow Chuan, said he will raise the issue in Parliament, and will push for amendments to the Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act (CPFTA).
Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin also said on Friday that the government “should see how to strengthen or adjust our laws to deal with these cases where individuals face such hurdles to seek resolution.”
“We operate closely to the law,” Mr Tan said. “In some instances, the laws do not provide for particular actions and even if we may not like it, we can’t go beyond the remits of the laws. So in these instances, we may have to review it.”
In the meantime, the executive director of CASE, Seah Seng Choon, had this advice for consumers:

“We hope that consumers will be able to stand firm and say ‘no’ to pressure sales tactics. Their money is in their wallet, and they can choose not to sign the sales agreement and pay the money.”
case

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

出资200万买凶杀人遭层层转包,百万酬金剩10万,6人获判刑

中国日前发生一宗离奇买凶杀人案,其中该笔“暗杀生意”被前后易手四次,涉及5名杀手,由原本200万人民币(约)到最后竟然仅剩10万人民币报酬,杀手认为报酬太低,风险太高,经思虑后认为该笔“生意”并不划算,最后主动联络目标,要求配合演戏骗取报酬。 事情要从2012年8月说起,广西商人章佑辉在投资参股两间公司,后来因合作上出现问题,魏某便对该公司起民事诉讼,而同年10月,章佑辉因担心亏损问题,起了杀心,找来了奚广安买凶暗杀魏某,于是便开始“中间商大赚差价”的离奇故事。 章佑辉先出资200万要求奚广安暗杀魏某,再来由奚广安以100万人民币聘雇莫天祥进行暗杀,随后莫天祥又找到了杨康生,以27万人民币来买凶杀人,而杨康生亦以相同方式,用20万人民币要求杨广生杀人,最后转到凌显四,竟然只剩下10万人民币。 由于凌显四认为10万人民币酬金来杀人实在太少,一旦败露还要赔上自己的人生,并不划算,索性找到魏某,向其告知暗杀计划,要求后者配合伪造现场,配合拍摄一张手被反绑的照片,称用于交差,将10万人民币骗到手。最后又要求到外地避风头,在3个多月后,魏某向南宁警方报案,这笔“层层转包”的买凶杀人案才得以曝光,6人先后被捕或自首。 该案曾以事实不清、证据不足为由,判处5人无罪,尔后便撤回一审判决,发回重审。在重审开庭后,6名被告一致翻供,并再次申请调取新证据,最终在今年10月17日,广西南宁中院对6人判定犯故意杀人罪成立,分别判处覃佑辉有期徒刑5年,奚广安有期徒刑3年半,杨康生、杨广生有期徒刑3年3个月, 莫天祥有期徒刑3年,凌显四有期徒刑2年7个月。

Medical practitioners issue signed letter to advise everyone to wear a mask always when leaving home

Four medical practitioners in Singapore have come together to sign a letter,…

Thinking about a trip to Hong Kong?

Thinking about a trip to Hong Kong? Then you have to be…

狮城女在中国被判枪决 两律师愿襄助现一丝希望

男友携带毒品入境中国,本地女子阿兹琳达也被捕,并在当地法院被判处死刑判决。不过目前有两名义务律师愿意襄助,以争取在当地高等法庭重新检讨此案,阿兹琳达再现一丝生机。 阿兹琳达是在五年前被卷入毒品案,实则携带毒品的是她的男友,在抵达深圳后两人被捕。 人权律师拉维,在接受本地网络媒体《独立新加坡》采访时透露,目前有两名分别来自中国上海和香港的律师,表示愿意帮忙此案,不过有鉴于官司的敏感度,他们暂不便透露姓名身份。 拉维也指出,代表律师要造访狱中的阿兹琳达也遇到阻碍,但新加坡外交部正试图让驻中国领事馆协调所需的大量文件,以协助官司。 拉维了解到,目前阿兹琳达有两个申诉管道,一个是在广东的法院检讨此案,其二则是在中国最高法院。 早前,阿兹琳达的家人担忧她将面对死刑,拉维坦言,可以理解家属当时的焦虑,但如今焦虑的阴霾暂时排除,也希望当地律师团队能取得所需资料,在新加坡领事的协助下尽快见到阿兹琳达。 有中国律师索取天价费用 拉维在不久前接受CNN新闻台采访,也曾指出在中国聘请律师非常昂贵,有者甚至索取天价,阿兹琳达家属根本无力承担。 “我尝试与一些国际友人联络,找愿意无偿打官司的律师,但她的官司程序仍在进行,我们不知何时会到下个法院的阶段。” 但CNN报导出街后,很快就有律师愿意代表阿兹琳达出庭。 拉维曾就阿兹琳达的处境,致函询问外交部,后者也在去年12月25日答复,当局知晓此事,而新加坡驻广州领事,也对阿兹琳达与另名新加坡男子尤思礼( Mohd Yusri),提供领事协助。…