yy
Chinese national and Singapore permanent resident, Yang Yin, allegedly transferred S$500,000 from the accounts of 87-year old Chung Khin Chun to his father in China.
The accusation came to light yesterday, as Mr Yang was in court for his bail hearing.
Mr Yang was eventually granted bail of S$150,000 by District Judge Eddy Tham, despite the objection of the Deputy Chief Prosecutor (DCP) who argued that Mr Yang posed a flight risk.
DCP Tan Ken Hwee had contended that Mr Yang posed a flight risk because of the potentially severe punishments from the charges which he currently faces.
Mr Yang has been charged with a total of 331 charges for falsifying his company accounts. The charges relate to some S$450,000 worth of receipts which were supposedly paid to his company, Young Music and Dance Studio.
Mr Yang had set up the company in 2009, one year after he had moved into Mdm Chung’s bungalow.
Mdm Chung was a partner in the company.
Mr Yang is reported to have obtained an employment pass and later his permanent residency through this firm.
In court yesterday, DCP Tan had asked that bail for Mr Yang be set at S$800,000.
He also said that since Mr Yang had allegedly transferred S$500,000 to his father, it meant that Mr Yang could post a higher bail.
Mr Yang’s lawyer, however, said that there was no evidence that the money which Mr Yang had allegedly sent to his father still remains.
District Judge Tham dismissed DCP Tan’s arguments and set the bail at S$150,000.
The judge also ordered Mr Yang’s passport to be impounded and for Mr Yang to report to the police every morning at 10am.
Mr Yang will be able to leave Changi Prison, where he is currently held, on Monday at the earliest after his bail is paid.
The Attorney General’s Chambers said that it would be making an application to the High Court with regards to the bail decision. The AGC however did not give details.
Mr Yang is currently also under investigation by the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) for possible infringements when he applied for his permanent residency, and is also facing a civil suit from the niece of Mdm Chung who is claiming damages from Mr Yang for breaching his duty to her aunt.
Mdm Chung has since applied to revoke the Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) which she had given to Mr Yang to oversee her assets, worth some S$40 million.
The Office of Public Guardian is looking into her application.
As for the suspected transfer of the half a million dollars which Mr Yang allegedly made to his father, the authorities are still investigating what this was for.

Subscribe
Notify of
10 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

分享讽刺视频 网民接资媒局警告信要求撤下

日前,警方和资讯通信媒体发展局(IMDA)发出联合声明,基于网红普丽蒂(Preetipls)的视频被指含侮辱内容,接受警方调查,而呼吁民众不要重新上载或分享有关视频。 本周一,本地Youtube网红“美丽求求你”普丽蒂(Preeti Nair,简称Preetipls),相信是不满电子付费平台epay拍摄的广告宣传照欠缺敏感度,也拍摄讽刺视频回应。 但有关视频在当天中午就被令撤下,警方稍后发文告指有人就普丽蒂上载的视频报案,视频被指含有侮辱性内容。 虽然原视频已遭撤下,但不久后仍有不少网民在脸书和youtube等平台重新上载,遭其他网民疯传。对此警方在前日发文呼吁民众停止在网络散播普丽蒂的视频。 事实上确实有网民,只因为分享视频结果接到资媒局的警告信,要求在六小时内把分享链接和贴文删除。其中社运分子范国瀚也中招。 范国瀚在脸书无奈写道:“我收到要求撤下普丽蒂视频的通知,根据资媒局,如果任由视频散播,会造成族群仇视和纠纷。”他也挖苦道,视频只能留在脸书六个小时,所以还没看的宜从速。 至于另一网民也把资媒局的信函分享在个人脸书,但他认为对于国人族群问题不应被扫在地毯下,大家更应该继续帮助少数族群维护权益。 网红“美丽求求你”拍摄的讽刺视频,亦引起许多争议。有部分网民认为政府有“双重标准”的嫌疑。针对新传媒的争议广告,只需要致歉,然而对网红兄妹的惩罚反而“严正以待”,甚至出动警方调查。  

Channel Newsasia bars Dr Chee – again

Andrew Loh / When Channel Newsasia (CNA), the local television news channel…

Pasir Ris-Punggol Town Council Chairman unaware of systemic issues, says blogger Phillip Ang

Blogger Phillip Ang recently raised the issue of maintenance in estates under…

被没收滑板车累积逾千仓储费? 陆交局:宽限期后未领取才计日收费

电动滑板车不符规格被没收,还要支付近两千元的仓储费?对于日前网络疯传的信函,陆路交通管理局作出澄清,表示只要在“宽限期”前,用户前来索回滑板车,就不会征收仓储费。 早前,网络疯传一则信函,收信人不合格的超重(27.7公斤)电动滑板车,在7月30日被陆交局执法人员没收。根据规定,包括电动滑板车等代步工具重量不可超过20公斤。 信中提到事主须在本月15日早上10时前往陆交局调查部门报到,协助调查违规使用过重滑板车一案。但是,信中也提到,事主还需缴付150元的拖车费,以及从车辆被扣当天算起,每日21元4角的仓储费。 事主的滑板车在两个月前被没收,若要从被没收当天算起至本月15日足足77天,仓储费可以高达1千647元8角! 而假设事主无法出席周一的调查会面,当局可在不另行通知下,销毁被没收的电动滑板车,同时,还会对事主拖欠的仓储费和拖车费,采取法律行动。 信函先是在本地道路资讯脸书Raod.sg上载,随即引来民众为事主抱不平,认为滑板车被没收的惩罚已够严重,对陆交局还要向事主征收仓储费感到难以置信,也认为这形同双重惩处,有欠公平。 不过,陆交局留意到网络流传的讯息,也很快在本月16日在官方脸书专页澄清,在当局完成调查后,对于那些符合资格的用户将获得“宽限期”来领回被没收的代步工具。过了宽限期还未领取,才会被征收仓储费。 不过,当局并未说明宽限期多久。至于对被没收代步工具征收高昂拖车费,除了补贴执法时的开支,也希望起到惩戒作用,警惕民众莫触法。 根据《道路交通法》第276章657项,针对摩多、脚踏车、电动脚踏车或个人代步工具等的没收费用为150元,仓储费为21元4角钱。 在今年5月1日,《活跃通勤法案》(Active Mobility Act)开始生效。新条例规定,电动脚踏车(PAB)和个人代步工具的重量不可超过20公斤、70公分宽和摩多驱动时需限速25时速。…