slyvia
Chairman of AHPETC, Ms Sylvia Lim and lawyer, Mr Peter Low
Chairman of Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC), Sylvia Lim, was in the witness stand as the hearing on summons issued by the National Environment Agency (NEA) to the AHPETC moves into the second day.
Ms Lim testified in court on why the town council felt that the application forms which it was required to submit to hold a community event were not applicable for the lunar new year event it held in January.
District Judge Victor Yeo  ruled after a day of deliberation that the question on why and when the NEA removed the term “town council” from the 2008 revised application form for trade fairs to be irrelevant to the ruling of the case and disallow Peter Low, lawyer for the WP town council, from asking the question.
The judge ruled that it is not his power to preside over the rationale of the law and said that such questions will be disallowed after Mr Low failed to convince the judge with past judgements that it is any matter of the court to determine whether one has exercised due diligence in violation of public welfare offences such as Section 35 of the Environmental Public Health Act (EPHA).
In court on Wednesday, Ms Lim referred to the communication between AHPETC and NEA starting with the email sent by AHPETC’s Public Relation Officer, Ms Chelsea Lu to Mr Tai Ji Choong, the NEA’s director of environmental health.
letter on 20th dec
Letter from AHPETC to NEA on 20th December 2013
Referring to the email sent on 20th December last year, Ms Lim explained that the town council sent the email to NEA because of concerns on whether the event to be held by the town council required any permit from the authorities and to ask for the forms which the town council had to submit, if any.
In the cover letter accompanying AHPETC’s application submission to the NEA, the town council highlighted that the form was used at the request of the NEA and that AHPETC felt that the form does not represent the town council’s agreement.
do not represent our agreement
Paragraph in the cover letter to NEA
In reply to Mr Low’s question of why the town council feel that the form was not suitable for the event, Ms Lim replied that there are three main reasons.
It was to Ms Lim’s understanding that trade fairs are normally referred to as “pasar malam” (night market) which are organised by Citizen Consultative Committees (CCCs).
The WP town council event, however, was intended to be held by the town council and was a community event, carried out on common area managed by the town council.
Ms Lim said that under the law, the powers and duties of the town council include the management of the common area.
Ms Lim also referred to the term “town councils” missing from the application forms supplied by the NEA.
In its previous version, the term was included as part of a list of entities which were allowed to conduct fairs.
Instead, one of the conditions specified by the application form, among the documents supposed to be obtained is a “letter of support” from the chairman of the Citizen Consultative Committee (CCC).
Ms Lim pointed out that in the case of the Hougang CCC, the branch leader is from the People’s Action Party.
“Since my colleagues and I were elected to manage the town council under the Town Councils Act, we do not see how the town council should be required to get a supporting letter from the CCC for something held in the common area under our charge,” Ms Lim told the court.
"Trade Fair" replaced with "Event"
“Trade Fair” replaced with “Event”
In the application form submitted to NEA, the wordings of “Trade Fair” is struck off and replaced with the word, “Event”. Ms Lim said that she approved the replacement of the words because it was constant with what they wrote in the cover letter that they do not believe they were organising a trade fair.
She also did not agree that the town council was holding a commercial activity as stated in the letter by the Ministry of National Development sent on 14th January 2014.
Frustration by defense lawyers
Mr Low showed signs of frustration after being blocked for “no less than 10 questions” in the past two days by Isaac Tan, the NEA prosecutor, saying that it is a waste of time.
Mr Low had not been able to ask any question from Mr Tai due to Mr Tan’s objections.
This came after Mr Tan’s prompt objection to Ms Lim’s statement of why the initial letter to NEA was sent.
Ms Lim was bringing up the point that she had been told by industry players in organising events that NEA “is not interested in events, unless open food stalls are involved or small events with less than 15 stalls.”
Before she could continue, the prosecution asked if the sources cited by Ms Lim would be questioned as witnesses. If the sources will not be questioned, then what Ms Lim said would be hearsay evidence.
Ms Lim said that she has not obtained permission from the people whom she spoke to, as their businesses could be affected.
Mr Low said that if Mr Tan has any objections on the hearsay evidence, he could address that in his cross-examination of the witness and  asked for the judge to allow Ms Low to allowed to continue her statement as it would provide the background of why the initial contact was made with NEA.
The judge noted the prosector’s objection but allowed Ms Lim to continue.
Other than Ms Lim, three more witnesses from the defense will be called up, Ms Chelsea Lu , Deputy General Manager of AHPETC, Mr Yeo Soon Fei and MP for Hougang SMC, Png Eng Huat.
The prosecution will be cross examining Ms Lim today (Thursday)


Application form submitted by AHPETC to NEA
NEA v AHPETC application form

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Indonesia's “mudik” ban akin to military strategy, says Acting Minister of Transportation

Indonesia’s ban on the mudik tradition this year resembles a military strategy,…

Woman defecating outside Holland MRT identified by NEA

The National Environment Agency (NEA) has identified the person who was photographed…

许通美“:行动党人格暗杀对手成选战败笔

尽管人民行动党在此次选举仍成功执政,横扫83席,不过巡回大使许通美教授也认为, 选民也传达了明确信息,要求政党拉高格调,注重解决议题而不是攻击政治对手。 许通美在《海峡时报》撰文表达看法,认为年轻选民给与行动党明确信息,而女性候选人亦表现出色。不过,行动党攻击对手的行为,似乎让选民们大皱眉头。 在选前,行动党陈有明曾借题发挥,挖出剧作家亚菲言过去言论,试图攻击工人党党魁毕丹星;接着该党盛港候选人辣玉莎被举报涉嫌发表族群言论。 不仅如此,连民主党秘书长徐顺全被指是“骗子”;至于该党主席淡马亚针对政府防疫政策发表的评论,亦同样被“泼马”(POFMA)。 许通美承认,工人党在盛港报捷绝对是此次选举大惊喜,也令人回想起行动党在2011年丢失阿裕尼集选区的情景。

印尼新内阁名单出炉 委任对手普拉博沃为国防部长

印尼总统佐科(Joko Widodo),今日公布其第二任期新内阁阵容。其中他委任前反对党领袖、此前成为他总统选举竞争对手的普拉博沃,成为国防部长,备受瞩目。 佐科威当天在宣布普拉博沃的新任务时说:“我认为我不需要向他讲解他的工作。他比我懂得更多。” 不过,普拉博沃被指在任职军官期间曾侵犯人权,而今却获延揽出任防长一职,相信将再引发争议。 普拉博沃(Prabowo Subianto),有显赫政治和家庭背景,也是前印尼独裁者苏哈托的女婿,在后者统治期间担任特种部队司令。 他被指控涉及多项侵犯人权行为,包括1998年数名亲民主活跃分子遭绑架及失踪事件。当时的事件导致大规模街头示威,最后推翻苏哈多政权。普拉博沃领导的陆军战略部队及其嫡系特种部队,也被指参与和策划1998年印尼排华暴动。不过,普拉博沃不曾因有关指控受到提控。 今年5月,印尼选举委员会公布选举结果,不过普拉博沃拒绝接受结果,其支持者也发起大规模抗议,超过万人参与。然而有人士蓄意挑衅和犯罪行为,雅加达一度陷入骚乱,惟普拉博沃与暴民保持距离。 至于佐科内阁的其他38位部长中,曾经出任世界银行董事经理的丝丽.穆耳雅妮继续出任财政部长,而外交部长蕾特诺也留任。 早前盛传将入阁的印尼电召魔多车GOJEK创办人纳迪姆,也证实出任教育及文化部长。他此前已宣布辞去市值100亿美元公司的总裁职务。 纳迪姆毕业于美国布朗大学和哈佛商学院,相信佐科有意倚重他推动印尼经济和技术的发展。