700px-Hrw_logo.svgA Singapore Supreme Court ruling on October 29, 2014, to uphold the country’s ban on same-sex relations between consenting adult men is a major setback for equal rights in Singapore, Human Rights Watch said today. The court decision sends a message that gay men may lawfully be subject to discrimination.
The Supreme Court held that section 377A of Singapore’s penal code, which criminalizes sexual intimacy between men, does not violate articles 9 and 12 of the country’s constitution. These articles guarantee the right to life and personal liberty, and provide that all people are entitled to equal protection before the law.
“The Supreme Court’s decision is a terrible setback for homosexual people in Singapore who want to live their lives like everyone else, without government interference,” said Boris Dittrich, advocacy director of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights program at Human Rights Watch. “The ruling tramples upon basic rights to privacy, equality, and non-discrimination.”
In July, the Supreme Court heard a joint appeal by three Singaporean citizens contesting section 377A. Gary Lim and Kenneth Chee had been involved in a romantic relationship for 16 years. They were joined in their appeal by Tan Eng Hong, who had been arrested in 2010 for allegedly engaging in a sexual encounter with another man. After both cases were dismissed by the Singapore High Court in April 2013, the Supreme Court decided to hear the case in 2014.
Section 377A of the penal code states: “Any male who, in public or private, commits, or abets the commission of, or procures or attempts to procure the commission by any male person of, any act of gross indecency with another male person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to 2 years.”
“Singapore likes to advertise itself as a modern Asian country and business destination,” Dittrich said. “But this discriminatory anti-LGBT law is wholly out of step with international rights standards that guarantee protections, including for sexual orientation and gender identity.”
Penal code section 377A, introduced in 1938, is a relic of British colonial rule. In 2007, the Singaporean government conducted a review of the penal code and decriminalized consensual acts of sodomy between heterosexual adults, while maintaining the provisions regulating “gross indecency” between men. However, the government rejected arguments to eliminate the discriminatory law.
Singapore’s law against homosexual conduct is contrary to the rights to non-discrimination, privacy, and freedom of expression recognized by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, whose provisions are considered reflective of customary international law. Singapore has a poor record, especially among members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), of ratifying international human rights instruments.
In 1994, the United Nations Human Rights Committee ruled in the case of Toonen v. Australia that laws criminalizing consensual homosexual conduct between adults violate the rights to non-discrimination and privacy. Consensual same-sex conduct between adults is currently criminalized in at least 76 countries.
Singapore should join countries such as Australia and New Zealand that have already abolished the British colonial-era sodomy laws that they also inherited, and take the lead on ending such discrimination, Human Rights Watch said.
“Singapore should recognize that its arbitrary restrictions on human sexuality affect not only Singaporeans, but everyone wanting to visit, work, or study in Singapore,” Dittrich said. “Perpetuating discrimination based on sexual orientation should worry foreign companies and educational institutions – and make them ask hard questions about whether they can operate freely in a Singapore with such retrograde laws on the books.”
This media release was first published on Human Rights Watch. We thank HRW for sharing it with us.

Subscribe
Notify of
275 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

MAS seeks public feedback on proposed new legal tender limit for coins

Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is seeking public feedback on the proposed new…

屡劝不听? 马国军队周日起助警执行管制令

邻国马来西亚自18日起,全国实施行动限制至31日。但国内仍可以跨州,甚至可以看见人民“趴趴走”的迹象。马国国防部宣布,将在来临的周日(22日)开始出动军队,协助警方执勤,确保人民遵守行动管制令。 马国国防部长依斯迈沙比里今日(20日)召开记者会指出,这是国家安全理事会会议今早所做出的决定。他强调马国政府仍无意戒严,但若人民依然不遵守行动管制令,不排除会采取更严厉的执法行动。 依斯迈沙比里说,根据1988年疾病控制法令第5条文,卫生部长有权可以让任何他认为有必要执法的单位进行维持秩序,而警方就是在这个条文下获得卫生部长的授权。 除了严格限制人民行动,由于我国与马国仅一水之隔,许多马劳也在我国工作,在管制令宣布之际,对这些马劳也造成极大的影响,许多人纷纷在禁令生效前赶往我国。 而马国劳工的住宿也掀起争议,不少雇主不得不仓促安排住宿,甚至有者被迫露宿地铁站。依斯迈沙比里表示,新马双方仍在商讨马国客工返回新加坡工作岗位的事宜。 国务资政兼国家安全统筹部长张志贤,昨日(19日)与马来西亚国防部长依斯迈通话,双方同意在马国行动管制期间,在获得妥善健康检测和住宿下,马国工作准证持有者仍可留在新加坡工作。

Indonesia to enter the first “new normal” phase on 1 June to prevent further economic crash

Indonesia government will enter the first phase of a “new normal” era…

97 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 93 locally transmitted cases, 29 unlinked

As of Friday noon (6 Aug), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…