The following is a press release from the National Solidarity Party on 23 October:
A clear understanding of our nation’s history is key to building a strong, unified nation. A Public Interest Declassification Board will serve to plug the gaps in our collective social memory, thus playing a vital role in nation-building.
dcEarlier this month, the PAP Government launched a reprint of ‘The Battle for Merger’, a compilation of speeches made by Mr Lee Kuan Yew in 1961 and originally published in 1962.
In his speech at the book’s launch, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean said that book would “provide a reality check” to attempts by some historians to recast the role played by communists and their supporters on the issue.
“They portray the fight as merely a peaceful and democratic disagreement over the type of merger. They ignore the more fundamental agenda of the communists to seize power by subversion and armed revolution,” he said. [1] The PAP Government’s re-publication comes as it classified a documentary by Singaporean filmmaker Tan Pin Pin, ‘To Singapore with Love’ as ‘Not allowed for all ratings’, which means it cannot be screened in public or distributed within Singapore.
According to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, the film is “a self-serving personal account, conveniently inaccurate in places, glossing over facts in others“.[2] Ironically, at least one academic has made similar allegations about “The ‘Battle for Merger’ – i.e. that it is “self-serving”.[3] Another academic, Dr Hong Lysa, commenting on ‘Operation Coldstore’ (another security operation launched in Singapore on 2 February 1963 in which about 111 anti-merger activists were arrested and detained) says in her blog entry[4] that “revisionist history” challenges the PAP Story and tells of the “struggle between the ‘pseudo-anticolonialist right-wing’ and the ‘genuine socialist anti-colonialists’.”
While the Media Development Board has classified Tan Pin Pin’s film ‘Not rated for public viewing”, it has not banned the film. The general public are entitled to view the film privately. In any case, hundreds of Singaporeans have already crossed the border to watch the film in Malaysia when it was screened as part of a film festival there.
By now, most informed citizens would have heard the Government’s narrative of the events leading to our independence. They would also have access to the various ‘revisionist histories’.
How do these citizens decide for themselves which one they should believe? If we accept the axiom “History is written by the victors” then the scepticism that a considerable number of such citizens would have regarding the official narrative is understandable.
As our 50th anniversary of independence draws near, there is considerable public interest in the history of modern Singapore. At the same time, there seems to be huge gap in our collective social memory.
In March this year, a call was made for the Government to bridge this gap by legislating a thirty-year rule Declassification Act, where Cabinet papers are released to the public domain after a thirty-year period. The Government responded that it would not be not prepared to enact such a legislation. It said that it would release information only to encourage good governance[5].
This discretion that the Government exercises as to which information it should release and which it should not, is not in the interest of the general public. The Government had previously clarified in Parliament that public interest is “not sufficient reason to disclose information“[6].
The Government’s reluctance to declassify some of these documents is understandable when the classified papers relate to national defence, foreign relations and internal security. The Government should have regard to public interest – especially when it is on the issue of collective social memory, for it is only with such a memory that we can build a strong, unified nation.
It is for this reason that the National Solidarity Party calls for the Government to establish a Public Interest Declassification Board – an advisory committee with the mandate to promote the fullest possible public access to a thorough, accurate, and reliable documentary record of extraordinary public interest. The members of this Board should comprise of elected Members of Parliament from the different political parties, reputable members of civil society and academics.
It is unreasonable for the Governing Party to assuage the general public to trust its discretion in such matters especially when the same Party has been the Government for over 50 years. Clearly, there are chances that such discretion may be exercised in a self-serving manner.
Especially when Singapore does not have legislation like the Freedom of Information Act or the Declassification Act, the establishment of Public Interest Declassification Board will demonstrate to the general public that matters of public interest are important to the Government, and that it is prepared to release classified papers provided they do not compromise matters of security and/or sensitive matters of bilateral relationship with other countries.
Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss, Secretary-General
On behalf of the 15th Central Executive Committee
of the NATIONAL SOLIDARITY PARTY

[1] http://www.straitstimes.com/the-big-story/the-battle-merger/story/mr-lee-kuan-yews-radio-talks-merger-fight-back-print-20141010#sthash.V0UD2ztI.dpuf
[2] http://www.straitstimes.com/news/singapore/more-singapore-stories/story/exiles-singapore-love-shouldnt-get-chance-air-self-servi#sthash.J8w4DHNJ.dpuf
[3] “Constructing Singapore: Elitism, Ethnicity and the Nation-building Project” By Michael D. Barr at Page 28
[4] http://minimyna.wordpress.com/2014/09/29/they-do-say-the-darnest-things-what-a-to-do-about-operation-coldstore/
[5] http://news.asiaone.com/news/singapore/release-govt-papers-guide-good-governance
[6] Parliamentary Debates on “CEO-DESIGNATE OF TEMASEK HOLDINGS (Resignation)” 18-08-2009 at Column: 936 found at this link: http://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/topic.jsp?currentTopicID=00003510-WA&currentPubID=00004791-WA&topicKey=00004791-WA.00003510-WA_1%2B%2B

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Nurse at NTFGH emergency dept contracted COVID-19; she was at work prior to isolation

It was reported yesterday that there were 12 new cases of COVID-19…

披萨送餐员承认撞路人犯过失罪 检方要求对被告执行缓刑

去年,一名披萨送餐员在蔡厝港的行人道上,行驶电动滑板车时撞上一名路人,涉嫌犯下过失罪。昨日被告(12日)认罪,检方要求对被告执行缓刑。 《今日报》报道,据法庭文件显示,去年5月23日,当时正值16岁的被告,以每小时20公里的速度在德惠巷行驶,已超出每小时15公里速度的限行。 被告李世嘉(译音)尽管已承认罪行,但他仍然辩称是54岁受害者当时冲向行人道,随之被法官质疑,认为他当时超速加上路障挡住视线,无法精准判断,因此驳回被告的说法。 据了解,被告的电动滑板车宽度为74厘米,比规定的70厘米还要长,判定该电动滑板车并不符合规定。当时被告骑到路口的时候并没有减速,因此撞倒受害者导致他跌倒,头撞上地板,造成4厘米深的伤口,最后由被告为受害者止血并送往医院。而医疗费用也由被告支付。 基于当时被告超速以及行驶不符合规定的电动滑板车,检察官要求提出缓刑而非罚款,不过检察官也表示,在犯罪期间,被告的年纪仍然相当年轻,因此才会提出缓刑需求。 被告预计在12月10日被裁定罪行。 本月5日开始,电动滑板车已被禁止在行人道上行驶,据交通部兼卫生部高级政务部长蓝彬明医生表示,基于涉及电动滑板车的事故频繁,11月5日起,电动滑板车被禁止在所有人行道使用。不过,脚车和电动轮椅等代步工具(Personal Mobility Aids),仍可在人行道、脚车道和公园连道使用。 陆交局则表示将予以两个月宽限期,先给那些违例在人行道使用电动滑板车的民众发出警告;从明年1月1日起,违例者一旦罪成,可被罚款最多2000元或坐牢三个月,或两者兼施。

警促知情者爆料 青少品尝超市饮料再放回货架惹议

一青年在超市中拿起架子上的饮料品尝后再放回架子上,随后又拿起另一个饮料品尝,视频中还写道“散播新型冠状病毒的方法”,令网民大喊难以接受,抨击应停止这种行为。据了解警方也已经呼吁民众提供资料。 有关视频昨日(2月10)起开始在Instagram 和推特上流传,只见一名身穿白底黑字上衣、背着背包的男少年和友人在超市中逛街时,从超市的冷藏架上拿起一瓶饮料,拧开瓶罐后品尝了一口。   View this post on Instagram   Like, really…