The following is a press release from the National Solidarity Party on 23 October:
A clear understanding of our nation’s history is key to building a strong, unified nation. A Public Interest Declassification Board will serve to plug the gaps in our collective social memory, thus playing a vital role in nation-building.
dcEarlier this month, the PAP Government launched a reprint of ‘The Battle for Merger’, a compilation of speeches made by Mr Lee Kuan Yew in 1961 and originally published in 1962.
In his speech at the book’s launch, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean said that book would “provide a reality check” to attempts by some historians to recast the role played by communists and their supporters on the issue.
“They portray the fight as merely a peaceful and democratic disagreement over the type of merger. They ignore the more fundamental agenda of the communists to seize power by subversion and armed revolution,” he said. [1] The PAP Government’s re-publication comes as it classified a documentary by Singaporean filmmaker Tan Pin Pin, ‘To Singapore with Love’ as ‘Not allowed for all ratings’, which means it cannot be screened in public or distributed within Singapore.
According to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, the film is “a self-serving personal account, conveniently inaccurate in places, glossing over facts in others“.[2] Ironically, at least one academic has made similar allegations about “The ‘Battle for Merger’ – i.e. that it is “self-serving”.[3] Another academic, Dr Hong Lysa, commenting on ‘Operation Coldstore’ (another security operation launched in Singapore on 2 February 1963 in which about 111 anti-merger activists were arrested and detained) says in her blog entry[4] that “revisionist history” challenges the PAP Story and tells of the “struggle between the ‘pseudo-anticolonialist right-wing’ and the ‘genuine socialist anti-colonialists’.”
While the Media Development Board has classified Tan Pin Pin’s film ‘Not rated for public viewing”, it has not banned the film. The general public are entitled to view the film privately. In any case, hundreds of Singaporeans have already crossed the border to watch the film in Malaysia when it was screened as part of a film festival there.
By now, most informed citizens would have heard the Government’s narrative of the events leading to our independence. They would also have access to the various ‘revisionist histories’.
How do these citizens decide for themselves which one they should believe? If we accept the axiom “History is written by the victors” then the scepticism that a considerable number of such citizens would have regarding the official narrative is understandable.
As our 50th anniversary of independence draws near, there is considerable public interest in the history of modern Singapore. At the same time, there seems to be huge gap in our collective social memory.
In March this year, a call was made for the Government to bridge this gap by legislating a thirty-year rule Declassification Act, where Cabinet papers are released to the public domain after a thirty-year period. The Government responded that it would not be not prepared to enact such a legislation. It said that it would release information only to encourage good governance[5].
This discretion that the Government exercises as to which information it should release and which it should not, is not in the interest of the general public. The Government had previously clarified in Parliament that public interest is “not sufficient reason to disclose information“[6].
The Government’s reluctance to declassify some of these documents is understandable when the classified papers relate to national defence, foreign relations and internal security. The Government should have regard to public interest – especially when it is on the issue of collective social memory, for it is only with such a memory that we can build a strong, unified nation.
It is for this reason that the National Solidarity Party calls for the Government to establish a Public Interest Declassification Board – an advisory committee with the mandate to promote the fullest possible public access to a thorough, accurate, and reliable documentary record of extraordinary public interest. The members of this Board should comprise of elected Members of Parliament from the different political parties, reputable members of civil society and academics.
It is unreasonable for the Governing Party to assuage the general public to trust its discretion in such matters especially when the same Party has been the Government for over 50 years. Clearly, there are chances that such discretion may be exercised in a self-serving manner.
Especially when Singapore does not have legislation like the Freedom of Information Act or the Declassification Act, the establishment of Public Interest Declassification Board will demonstrate to the general public that matters of public interest are important to the Government, and that it is prepared to release classified papers provided they do not compromise matters of security and/or sensitive matters of bilateral relationship with other countries.
Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss, Secretary-General
On behalf of the 15th Central Executive Committee
of the NATIONAL SOLIDARITY PARTY

[1] http://www.straitstimes.com/the-big-story/the-battle-merger/story/mr-lee-kuan-yews-radio-talks-merger-fight-back-print-20141010#sthash.V0UD2ztI.dpuf
[2] http://www.straitstimes.com/news/singapore/more-singapore-stories/story/exiles-singapore-love-shouldnt-get-chance-air-self-servi#sthash.J8w4DHNJ.dpuf
[3] “Constructing Singapore: Elitism, Ethnicity and the Nation-building Project” By Michael D. Barr at Page 28
[4] http://minimyna.wordpress.com/2014/09/29/they-do-say-the-darnest-things-what-a-to-do-about-operation-coldstore/
[5] http://news.asiaone.com/news/singapore/release-govt-papers-guide-good-governance
[6] Parliamentary Debates on “CEO-DESIGNATE OF TEMASEK HOLDINGS (Resignation)” 18-08-2009 at Column: 936 found at this link: http://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/topic.jsp?currentTopicID=00003510-WA&currentPubID=00004791-WA&topicKey=00004791-WA.00003510-WA_1%2B%2B

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

32 new cases of COVID-19 infection in S’pore; 29 locally transmitted cases, 13 unlinked

As of Thursday noon (19 Aug), the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

疑争执持刀弑母打死外婆 发狂青年被控谋杀

联邦道组屋周日晚发生一场惨绝人道的家庭悲剧,一名青年涉嫌杀害自己的母亲和阿嬷后,还追着一名女佣下楼,这名22岁的男嫌犯于昨日被控谋杀。 事件发生于周日(10月27日)晚上7时24分左右,在联邦道(Commonwealth Avenue)第7A座组屋其中一间单位中,死者分别是男嫌犯吴立恩的56岁母亲李素梅,以及90岁的外婆施庆庆。 警方证实他们于当天晚上7时24分接获投报,指该组屋区发生命案。抵达现场时,警方发现两名死者已经倒卧在地,医护人员也宣告两人当场死亡。 据悉,男嫌犯吴立恩怀疑是与母亲发生争执后,怒火烧尽理智,拿起刀子狂砍母亲。 当时在一旁的外婆和印尼女佣目睹一切,害怕地夺门而出,但是年迈的老妇却没有成功逃脱,被嫌犯逮住后疑遭乱拳打死。成功逃跑的印尼女佣当时紧急逃出单位跑下楼,并且传简讯向其他女佣求助,嫌犯见状也追着跑下楼。 组屋楼下发狂打伤六人 在组屋楼下当时有一个家庭正在进行法事,10余人跟随乩童从第6座组屋朝第8座组屋前进时,在走廊遇见嫌犯。 据他们指出,嫌犯身穿着背心和短裤,却没有穿鞋子,而他的右手掌有血迹。 他们表示嫌犯当时朝向巴士站走去,和他们有约10米的距离,却突然转身用英语大喊“叫政府人来跟我说话”,然后手握拳比划,且情绪激动。 乩童一伙人趋前尝试安抚嫌犯,没料到嫌犯却挥拳相向,打了一人的右眼、乩童左颧骨挨了一拳。人群见状立刻开始制止嫌犯,其中一人被打中右眼,导致眼部淤青红肿。 他们指出,嫌犯几乎整个人失控了,见人就打,而且力大无穷,他们花了好大力气才成功把他压制住,叫警方到现场将他逮捕上手铐,而经他一闹,至少六人受伤。…

Online users slam Minister Lawrence Wong’s explanation on raising DORSCON level; calls the Govt to be honest with the public

National Development Minister Lawrence Wong said that there’s still “misunderstanding” and “a…