Former army regular sharing his thoughts of the government’s method of policy delivery.
Former army regular sharing his thoughts of the government's method of policy delivery.
Former army regular sharing his thoughts of the government’s method of policy delivery.
The first IPS-Nathan Lecture by Executive Chairman of Banyan Tree Holdings, Ho Kwon Ping took place at the National University of Singapore’s Cultural Theatre on Monday evening. In his lecture, Prof Ho presented his views on how Singapore’s political scene would be shaped in the next fifty years.
In his speech, Mr. Ho had earlier brought up the issue about Singaporeans taking a more active approach towards discontent, such as senior Singaporeans turning up at Hong Lim Park. He also pointed out that the young generation would look towards policy promises by political parties while the older generation might reward the achievements by the parties as they have more at stake to risk.
During the question and answer session, a senior gentleman from the audience took up the microphone said,

“I (refer to) your comment about  older people forming the protesters at Hong Lim Park. All the time it is thought that the older generation that understands the PAP government the most because… they knew what were the challenges faced by Mr Lee Kuan Yew and his team.
And you mentioned that it is the young people today that have got wider aspirations and don’t just look at the economical progress.
I would like to share two points and would seek your comments on that.
One is, if you look at the older people, many of them like myself, I served thirty years in the army and I know the system from inside. And how policies are decided.
Number two, being a grandfather, many old people are now very very concerned about the Singapore their grandchildren are going to inherit. So I believe that it would be serious if the government doesn’t understand why the older generation are not going to buy the Pioneer Generation Package as a candy that will be won over…
Because go to any hawker centre wherever, we always say that only the youngsters go on internet media, alternative media; but people are around at the coffeeshops, hawker centres, some of them.
Now just over two weeks ago, I was at Parkway Central market and now people do not whisper why they dislike about what is happening. They talk at the top of their voice and it is very important that the government understands that it is not whispering any more. Thank you.”

Mr. Ho: I think that point should be taken by Mr Janadas Devan who is also head of Information Services of the government.
Janadas Devan: I am not answering that.

Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

共同打造具包容性社会 严燕松欢迎更多建设性建议

居民所求的是更好的生活,尤其更为关注年长者和残障人士的基本设施方面及福祉,因此工人党阿裕尼集选区候任议员严燕松在脸书帖文,欢迎网民们给出建议,打造更好、更具包容性的社区。 他在帖文中指出,他周日走访居民,有居民向他反映,希望让残障人士能够获得全额交通补贴。 事实上,工人党在今年大选的竞选宣言中,倡议所有新加坡残障人士和65岁以上的年长者,能够免费乘坐地铁和公共巴士。 严燕松指出,我国作为发达国家,负担得起有关费用,而更重要的是,这样能够提高年长者和残障人士的劳动参与率,提高社会的包容性。 他在帖文尾端,也欢迎更多民众给出良好建议,为打造友善社区而努力。

Dr Wong Wee Nam: Why I intend to vote for Tan Jee Say

Dr Wong Wee Nam/ The following is an excerpt from an article…

【选举】以三国故事回应非选区议员制 符策涫:工人党为大局捍卫国人利益

竞选最多议席的三名政党候选人受邀参与《早报》辩论直播,在网民提问有关非选区议员课题时,各候选人都有不同见解,工人党东海岸集选区候选人符策涫更以三国的典故来回答。 人民行动党丹戎巴葛集选区候选人陈振声、新加坡前进党的西海岸集选区候选人潘群勤,及工人党东海岸集选区候选人符策涫今晚(7月2日)受邀参与直播辩论,所围绕的课题包括了各党竞选宣言、替代政策的阐述,以及最近成为课题的非选区议员制度。 在辩论的第四环节中,就有网民郑女士询问陈振声对非选区议员的看法,是否非选区议员制对当选候选人不公平,因为他们无需管理市镇会,走后门进入国会,并且还有和当选议员一样的投票权。 对此,陈振声指出,他也曾在基层听过类似的争议,更有人表示笑说,希望当选非选区议员。他指出,执政党提出这个系统,为了能够听到其他的声音,我国修宪保障了12个非选区议员和九名官委议员的席位,就有了21个不同的声音。这样就能够让执政党能够听到更多的声音,透过更好的辩论、机制来决策未来,照顾国民,而且没有遗漏任何一个人。“而不是为了怕有挑战,因为真金不怕火。” 至于公平与否,担任议员的行动党代表,就做好议员的职责;就算行动党,就像在后港或阿裕尼选区,他们还是会服务当地选区。“因为我们的信念是,我们要服务好每一个新加坡人,要照顾好整个新加坡。” 潘群勤:不利反对党 潘群勤则表示,若要听到别的声音,现在科技发达,到处都能够听到别的声音,因此对此政策的目的存有怀疑。她认为,非选区议员制度其实对反对党非常不利,因为会诱使选民不投票给反对党,“反正国会内都会有反对党的声音”。 她认为,当选议员和非选区议员的力量是很不一样的,因为当选议员的声音代表着许多选民的声音,而不是只是成为国会里的“别的声音”。 而符策涫则表示,该党一直以来都不支持非选区议员的做法,但是逼于无奈也只能接受,因为受束缚于这个框架中,只能在框架中找出路。他引用三国故事典故,将该党比作关羽,“接受”非选区议员制,有三个条件。 “ 第一,降汉不降曹:该党不接受非选区议员的做法,但在大局下,在局限下,我们的接受; 第二,保护嫂嫂:工人党的出发点永远都是为了捍卫新加坡人的利益,所以作为非选区议员的责任是非常重大;…

A conflict of interest?

Joseph Teo/ In the Straits Times on Thursday 12 May 2011, on…