fotf
The “It’s Uncomplicated” programme which has been in the news this week “was based on materials from experts such as author Gary Chapman, who is known for his concept of the Love Languages, as well as social researchers Jeff Feldhahn and his wife Shaunti, whose work is internationally recognised.” (TODAY)
Mrs Feldhahn has written a letter to the vendor, the Christian group Focus on the Family, which runs the programme in schools, including in Hwa Chong Institution, in Singapore.
In it, she urged the group to “ask for a meeting with the government ministry” in SIngapore which is considering ceasing the programme “by end-2014”, as reported in the news 2 days ago.
Here is the full letter from Mrs Feldhahn.

To the leaders of Focus on the Family Singapore:

Feldhahn
Feldhahn
I have seen the news reports about the current questions and concerns raised by a student about the FOTF program taught in schools. It appears that some significant portions of your program were based on my research with men, women, teenage boys and teenage girls over the past 12 years. Even though I do not have much time to reply, I wanted to get you a little bit of information and offer a perspective, in case it helps you discuss this with the government. Especially since I see that the latest news is that the Ministry of Education is saying (at least for now) that the program will cease by the end of the year.
Here is my quick perspective:
In 2009, the government agency then known as MCYS brought in me and Jeff to conduct programs for several thousand young professional singles and college students, as well as train-the-trainer sessions for several hundred leaders and counselors who work in the marriage and family arena. (I met several Focus on the Family Singapore representatives at those train-the-trainer sessions.) At those events, Jeff and I shared the results of our many years of rigorous research, as published in books such as For Women Only and For Men Only as well as the teenage versions that were based on extensive studies with high school and college students.
The Government of Singapore brought us in because they were (and are) trying to encourage the establishment of healthy relationships and, eventually, marriages and families. This was a highly successful series of events that we hope to do again at some point in the future. These efforts by the government were designed to be both encouraging and preventative rather than simply fixing problems. The idea was to AVOID the social and economic problems seen so often in the U.S. as we have trended away from healthy family formation. Every sociologist in the world essentially acknowledges that a married two-parent family gives children (and the couple themselves) the greatest chance of thriving in life. Not that single parents cannot give children a great start, but that the odds are much better in a healthy marriage. And a healthy marriage has much better odds of forming if young people have healthy understanding of relationships and each other from the beginning.
Thus, the government brought us in to share our research not only to help individuals, but also as a way to help independent organizations and counselors create and deliver the very types of ‘healthy relationships programs’ that FOTF then created for the school system. (As you noted, your program is not a sexuality program but one for healthy relationships.) Because our research is extensive, scientifically rigorous and statistically valid across all age groups and ethnic backgrounds, it provides a good foundation for a strong education in those key elements that young people and married couples most need to know.
One of the key reasons why a good train-the-trainer program was needed, was that this research can also be misunderstood, as demonstrated by the Facebook post from Agatha Tan. While the vast majority of readers (and, it sounds like, your program participants) are supportive and find it extremely helpful and life-changing, there are some who, historically, misunderstand or misread the research. A clear example is the explanation of the ultra-visual brain wiring of men and boys. We are careful to say that this male brain wiring makes it difficult if not impossible for a man to avoid noticing a woman who is dressed provocatively (only 2% said they wouldn’t notice) – but that each man has a choice of how to handle that reaction (to respect the woman in his thought life and actions, or not). And yet there are always a few women who completely miss what we are saying and arrive at the conclusion that we’re saying “boys will be boys and there’s nothing we can do about it.” Similarly, as you know, since many men want to honor women but find themselves confronted by explicit images they would prefer not to see, we think it is important to emphasize that BOTH men and women, boys and girls, have a responsibility here. We emphasize the ned for men and boys to respect women, but also for women and girls to respect men. We strongly disagree with the idea that teaching the brain wiring and mutual respect is somehow contributing to a “rape culture.” That is a clear misunderstanding, and it confuses the real and important issue and teaching that will help both men and women.
It is my hope that you will ask for a meeting with the government ministry that is currently considering whether or not to discontinue your program. I urge you to show them that this is based on years of rigorous research, and to ask them to consider that this type of healthy relationships program is exactly the sort of program the government was wanting to create to educate and encourage young people now, in order to form healthy families later. While I don’t know the specifics of what your program involves, and I’m assuming there are always improvements and changes that can be made to any initiative, I hope that you and the government officials involved do not give up on something that already has, and will continue to, set a great foundation for Singapore’s future.
With appreciation,
Shaunti Feldhahn

Subscribe
Notify of
4 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

冒充民防部队官员发假电邮给采购公司 当局提醒勿上当!

近年来,诈骗事件层出不穷,无论是政府机构、艺人或政治人物都经常被假冒,试图骗取民众。不法之徒试图冒充成民防部队官员,以假电邮传给不同公司,称欲向他们采购。 民防部队今日(12日)在脸书上发表文告,指近日内有人冒充民防部队官员,并篡改民防部队的官方电子邮件,将其发给不同公司,称欲向他们采购产品。 据民防部队指出,该冒充的电邮是“[email protected]”.,民防部队澄清,所有官方电邮将会有“@scdf.gov.sg”而已。 有鉴于此,民防部队也以通报警方,交由警方调查,并呼吁若有任何公司收到相关电邮,应该通报警方。 此外,民防部队也解释他们的采购流程,根据政府的采购程序,民防部队只会在新加坡政府的采购网站(GeBiz)上公开招标和报价,公司亦需要透过该管道提成报价。

S’pore “very likely” to start COVID-19 vaccine booster exercise; severely immunocompromised people need third shot of vaccine

Health Minister Ong Ye Kung said on Thursday (19 Aug) that Singapore…

Dengue cases rose to 108 cases after six consecutive weeks of decline

Dengue cases saw another hiked this week to 108 cases after six…

马国首相宣布新内阁 无副首相改委四高级部长

经历上月底的政坛风暴后,邻国马来西亚变天,希盟政府倒台,马国国家元首在本月1日,委任慕尤丁成为马国第八任首相。 在一周后慕尤丁在今日宣布新内阁,不过这次未设副首相,反而委任4名高级部长,分别是国际贸易及工业部长阿兹敏(土团党)、国防部长依斯迈沙比利(巫统)、工程部长法迪拉(砂政党联盟)及教育部长莫哈末拉迪(土团党)。 至于财政部长由联昌国际银行集团(CIMB)首席执行员扎夫鲁(Tengku Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz)接任。 卫生部长则是来自巫统的阿汉峇峇(Adham Baba),本身也是吉隆坡大学皇家医学院学院主席。 马国内阁有五名华人担任政府部长,马华总会长魏家祥出任交通部长、署理总会长马汉顺任第一副教育部长、副总会长林万锋任国际贸易及工业部副部长,及黄日昇出任原产业第一副部长。砂政盟的张庆信出任国家团结部副部长。