High Court ruled that the legal bills sought by the Singapore Medical Council from Dr Susan Lim, in relation to an earlier court case, were overcharged.
Ironically, the case that was awarded in favour of SMC two years ago against Dr Lim was the result of a probe into whether Dr Lim has overcharged her client.
Dr Lim was earlier investigated for overcharging her client, a member of the Brunei royal family, for services which totalled about $24 million. She was found guilty of professional misconduct in 2012 and was suspended for three years, censured and fined $10,000 by the SMC.
SMC then proceeded to file claims against her, to the sum of $1.33 million. However, the High Court ruled on Wednesday, 1 October that the legal bills sought by SMC were themselves inflated, and reduced them to $317,000.
SMC is believed to be seeking an appeal against the High Court judgement.
SMC’s legal work for the case was done by Senior Counsel Alvin Yeo, a Member of Parliament, and lawyers Melanie Ho and Lim Wei Lee.
The following is a sample of the overcharged items.

Item SMC claimed it cost… High Court ruled it should cost…
Total legal fees $1.33 million $317,000
Legal cost for trial $900,000 $180,000
Legal cost for appeal hearing $150,000 $70,000
Legal assessment for the case $235,000 $22,000
Expert witnesses $52,000 $14,000
Ring binders for documents $6 per unit $2.50 per unit
Subscribe
Notify of
32 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Singapore condemns vicious terrorist attack in Westminster, London

Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) has stated that Singapore strongly condemns the vicious…

Retired fund manager treats 36 elderly cardboard collectors to a meal on his birthday; hopes leaders will take appropriate actions to help those in need

On 1 November (Friday), a Singaporean turned 60 but instead of having…

Netizens slam the move to demolish Sentosa Merlion to make way for a S$90 million pedestrian bridge

Sentosa Merlion, one of Singapore’s most iconic statue, will be demolished in…

王乙康质问辅助金福利从哪来? 民主党林文兴:“从部长薪金下刀”

昨日,在《8视界》的新加坡大选2020政党论政首场辩论会,民主党马西岭-油池候选人林文兴,重申该党竞选宣言的建议,让65岁以上退休人士能够每月领取500元收入,同时还要为不幸被裁员的人士提供福利。 “有钱拿国民当然很高兴”,但人民行动党王乙康质问开销如此之大,钱应该从哪里来? 民主党林文兴直言不讳地说,不如先从部长薪金开始?他指出从民主党所作出的调查显示,内阁部长的薪金若能获得削减,最少都能省下1千万至1千200万元开销,这意味着,庞大的资金已经能够为至少2000位最贫困的老人提供每月500元生活费。 林文兴:“先从部长的薪金下刀” 此外,民主党认为政治领袖应该以身作则,为人民做出贡献,尤其疫情时刻,一起度过难关。 再者,民主党主张将国家一些重大项目停止,如星耀樟宜等,因为项目的建设并没有获得理想的回报,并直言如同浪费纳税人的钱。 王乙康则对民主党的“部长减薪说”不认同,他认为即使砍部长薪金,也是杯水车薪,无法真正补给老人补助的开销 林文兴:中小企业并未如王乙康所说获得补助 另一方面,林文兴也亦质问王乙康,有关就业补助金的补助金,尽管人民行动党宣称提供给中小企业的补助都已经进入到企业内,但前进党在走访民间时,发现中小企业并未如王乙康所说,获得补助金,造成企业的资金紧缩,因此人民行动党应该解释其补助金的分配详细百分比。 对此,王乙康则称就业补助旨在削减开支,保住员工的饭碗,因此纳入到企业的开支。就业补助并非以企业的大小规模而定,而是一视同仁。 林文兴总结时强调,人民行动党在疫情前已漏洞百出,并暗指行动党如今无法取得民众信任。然而,民主党与行动党最大差异在于民主党旨在聆听人民的心声,是将人民的福祉和福利摆在首位,因此让为民思虑的在野党进入国会,让人民的心声也能够被听见。