safe_image
By Second ChancesSingapore Anti-death penalty campaign and Think Center
The following was a letter the Singapore Working Group on the Death Penalty – a coalition made up of Second Chances, the Singapore Anti-Death Penalty Campaign and Think Centre – submitted to the Straits Times Forum. The letter was not chosen for publication.
We refer to the Law Minister’s comments as reported in the article ‘Death penalty needed in anti-drug fight: Shanmugam’ on 27 September.
In his speech at the United Nations, Mr Shanmugam asserted that the death penalty is an effective deterrent to drug trafficking in Singapore. He also said that the debate over capital punishment should shift to facts.
Facts are important in this debate, but there has been a lack of publicly available criminological studies in Singapore to support Mr Shanmugam’s point. Furthermore, a 2009 study comparing homicide rates in Singapore and Hong Kong strongly suggested that the death penalty is no more effective than alternative forms of punishments.
The mere fact that Singapore has both the death penalty and low capital crime rates does not necessarily mean that there is a direct link between the two. In fact, other criminological studies have shown that socioeconomic factors and the likelihood of getting caught have more influence over crime than the severity of punishment.
This lack of concrete evidence on the death penalty’s deterrent value has also been pointed out by MPs and NMPs such as Mrs Lina Chiam, Ms Sylvia Lim, Mr Laurence Lien and Ms Faizah Jamal when Parliament debated the amendments to the mandatory death penalty in 2012.
In the interest of a fact-based debate on the death penalty in Singapore, we would invite the government to share any studies upon which conclusions on the effectiveness of the death penalty as a deterrent have been drawn. We also call for more rigorous, independent studies to be conducted on this issue.
Singapore should not resort to the death penalty without concrete proof of its necessity, especially if alternative forms of punishment can have the same effect. The inevitability of human error within the system also makes the chances of wrongful executions far too high a cost for us to use capital punishment as an instrument of justice.

Subscribe
Notify of
28 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

法国品牌Moule Bouchot疑含有大肠杆菌,食品局下令召回

法国品牌Moule Bouchot的贻贝,疑含有大肠杆菌,因此食品局进口商召回该产品。 食品局昨日(10月1日)发文告表示,因疑似含有高度的大肠杆菌,欧盟食品和饲料快速通报系统(RASFF)已召回法国品牌Moule Bouchot的贻贝(mussels),其中包括5公斤和10公斤包装,批次标记是M 19 39 3 CAO。 而上述产品亦进口到我国,故食品局已要求进口商Elite Fine Food LLP召回该产品。目前相关受影响产品已召回,而且并为在我国零售市场出售。

An easy passage of amendment of Constitution by a majority PAP govt

By Abdul Salim Harun The Parliament has passed the Amended Constitution on…

马哈迪:暂不需要新隆高铁 专注提升现有铁路服务

“马来西亚暂时不需要高铁计划,暂时会先关注提升国内现有铁路系统服务。” 马来西亚首相敦马哈迪表示,高铁计划只是衔接吉隆坡和新加坡,而且马来西亚仍有衔接新加坡的交通系统,所以暂时没必要落实。 他昨日在赛城出席一场铁路创新汇报会时说道,马国以后可能需要兴建衔接柔佛新山和槟城,或是到泰国边境的高铁项目,所以暂时不兴建高铁。“如果高铁只能缩短30分钟的行程,是不划算的,因为人们还需要前往高铁站的时间。但是如果路线够长,能节省两至六小时,那么我认为兴建高铁将是一个好方案。” 提升现有铁路服务方面,他表示,该国已经取得一些进展,通过提升双轨铁道和电动火车的服务与素质。“电动火车不会污染环境,也能高速行驶,时速可以达到每小时160公里。” 推迟两年再商议 当询及新隆高铁计划要延长到北部的槟城或泰国边境,是否有与新加坡商讨过时,马哈迪表示还没有,但是他认为新加坡只会考虑衔接到吉隆坡而已。 他表示,马国要求推迟两年再讨论新隆高铁计划,虽然该国未发出任何合约,但是他们必须赔偿我国。 新加坡和马来西亚在2018年9月签署协议,暂停新隆高铁计划到2020年5月31日,马国也因此赔偿了1500万新元给我国。