The Media Development Authority has issued a statement today, requesting The Opinion Collaborative Ltd (TOC Ltd), the social enterprise that owns and manages TOC, to register under the Broadcasting (Class Licence) Notification.
TOC Ltd has received the request, and is studying the registration requirements. The social enterprise will be discussing the details with MDA. A response will be made in due course.
The following is MDA’s statement in full, which is also available at MDA’s website.

The Media Development Authority (MDA) has, on 30 Sept 2014, notified The Opinion Collaborative Ltd (TOC Ltd), the corporate entity behind The Online Citizen (TOC), to register under the Broadcasting (Class Licence) Notification, which was enacted under Section 9 of the Broadcasting Act. 
MDA has assessed that the TOC website engages in the propagation, promotion or discussion of political issues relating to Singapore. As a corporate entity, TOC Ltd is susceptible to foreign influence through the receipt of foreign funding. MDA will therefore require that TOC Ltd undertake not to receive foreign funding for its provision, management and/or operation as part of the registration. MDA’s registration requirement seeks to uphold the principle that politics must remain a matter for Singapore and Singaporeans alone.
As with other registered sites such as The Independent and Mothership.sg, the registration does not entail changes to the content standards and will not affect what TOC may publish on its website.

Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

鄞义林以香港公民社会为鉴 吁新加坡人莫忘为自己权益抗争

香港抗议游行造成了全球的连锁效应,甚至在我国也引发了热烈的讨论。 2019年,香港特别行政区政府提交香港立法会审议的一法律草案,以向中国大陆、澳门和台湾等司法管辖区移交嫌疑人和进行法律协助。此提案源于潘晓颖命案,现时香港法律无法向台湾移交疑犯,同时特区政府宣称原有逃犯移交条例不包括中国大陆及澳门亦是「法律缺陷及漏洞」。草案甫经提出,便招致社会各方质疑和关切香港作为独立司法管辖区的独立性或遭削弱,甚至批评草案是对“一国两制”致命的冲击。 而目前旅居台湾的维权人士鄞义林,周一(17日)在脸书上,表达对香港抗议活动的看法,以及它对于新加坡的启示。 文中指出,香港反送中集会,反而促使港人同仇敌忾。远在香港发生的大事,也引起了新加坡人对示威的关注与非议,大致分为两派:忧虑新加坡是否会在未来发生动荡,又或者希望本土人民也能团结站出来抗争。 他写道,“ 一派的看法,非常忧虑示威行动所带来的骨牌效应,担心新加坡也会发生同样的示威行动。而这一派的留言者,通常都是新加坡政治制度下的受惠者,你会从他们的留言中听到”新加坡是非常好的地方、新加坡非常长稳定,我们不应该在如此美好的国家发生这样的暴动。“ 另一方面,他指出,“ 另一派的看法,则来自于被新加坡政治制度遗忘的人,这些人他们觉得被抛弃,或曾经被新加坡所伤害过。他续指,“这些人从香港示威行动中再次燃起希望,为自己的权益和自主抗争到底。” 鄞义林阐述,此次示威行动成功,不仅仅是对香港人民非常重要,更是给与那些对专制制度感到无力的人新希望,认为我们也有可能走向这一步。 他解释,那些所谓要保住“新加坡良好制度”的人,无疑都是受惠的一方,他们想要守住在这个制度下所获得的威望与利益。他们也知道,如果新加坡变成更平等的国家,他们的利益和威望也相对不保。 他也在文中说道,他仅仅是简单撰述示威行动的现况,但他表示香港的示威行动也引起了两端的争议,“受惠者的恐惧,以及边缘化者的希望“,并认为这是去向更平等的世界有必要经历的过程。 然而,他感慨认为,人民无法从香港示威行动中得到学习,也没有意愿将新加坡变成更接近平等的地方。鄞义林说,“…

"For Singapore to progress, we cannot operate on this paradigm of a scorched earth policy" – WP's Yee Jenn Jong

Recently we’ve been inundated with coverage on the High Court decision that…

77-year-old uncle died of head injury sustained from fall caused by malfunctioned lift

A 77-year-old man died in the early morning of 16 May after…