Roy Ngerng, the blogger at the centre of a defamation suit filed by Lee Hsien Loong and who is also involved with the CPF protests in recent months, posted the following on his blog on 27 September.
r9
Mr Ngerng might have been carried away by the adrenalin from the previous day’s rowdy protest at Hong Lim Park (Speakers’ Corner), and made the erroneous – and rather inflated – claim that the protest was “the first march in Singapore since independence.”
The claim is not quite true, actually.
In fact, there have been not a few marches – whether at Hong Lim Park itself or in other public areas – in Singapore throughout the years, post-independence.
We highlight here some of the more prominent ones.
Barely one and a half months after our independence on 9 August 1965, Nanyang University students took to the streets and attempted to march in protest for the expulsion of 85 students from the university.
The police, however, halted the march before it started.
It was 30 October 1965:
nantah 1965
Then, a year later, on 12 October 1966, there was a protest march by some 1,000 University of Singapore students to “demand for university autonomy , academic freedom, and withdrawal of suitability certificates for freshmen.”
uos protest march
 
uosprotest2
Protest marches were not limited to those who were protesting against the authorities here.
The Singapore Government-affiliated National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) has mounted several protests too.
In June 1973, the NTUC organised a protest march to the French embassy here to express its concerns over the French’s nuclear tests in the pacific.
ntuc protest french 1
And on May 11, 1988, “the (NTUC) staged a massive protest involving 4,000 workers in Shenton Way to signal its unhappiness with the United States for interfering with Singapore’s domestic politics”, a Straits Times report in 2012 said.
“While some saw it as a strike, it was more of a public protest, said NTUC president emeritus John De Payva, who participated in it.”
Another report said the NTUC “drove buses around the U.S. embassy, held a rally attended by four thousand workers, and issued a statement deriding the U.S. as ‘sneaky, arrogant, and untrustworthy’.”
ntucprotest us
ntucprotestus2
In more recent times, perhaps the group most known for holding public protests and marches (attempted or otherwise) would be the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP).
The most famous attempt by the SDP at conducting a march would be the one in 2006, during the meeting of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) at Suntec City.
The SDP had planned to march from Hong Lim Park to the convention centre and Parliament house. However, they were surrounded and stopped by the police from doing so.
What transpired was a 3-day stand-off between the authorities and the political opposition party.
sdp
While the SDP may have failed to hold the march as it had planned that day, the party and its supporters were more successful three months later – when, wearing yellow t-shirts, it commemorated International Human Rights Day with a Freedom Walk from Speakers’ Corner to the Istana and to Changi Prison where the SDP leader, Dr Chee Soon Juan, was being incarcerated for speaking in public without a permit.
sdpwalk
Two years later, on 15 March 2008, the SDP held a march and protest on World Consumers’ Day (WCD), from Orchard Road to Parliament.
Along the way, however, the group was stopped and eventually arrested by the police.
Here is a video of the march:

The SDP’s WCD march was similar to the one held the previous year by the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE), also on World Consumer’s Day, in the downtown area.
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
The manner in which the two similar events were treated by the authorities gave rise to questions by members of the public. (Read here: “A CASE of double standards?”)
But Singaporeans were not the only ones who have held public marches and protests.
One example of foreigners getting in on this was the Orchard Road march-cum-protest by Burmese nationals in 2007, when Burma was in political turmoil as the military junta massacred its own people, including monks.
A group of Burmese working in Singapore decided to show solidarity with their countrymen back home and held a march in Orchard Road in December.

As for marches and protests in Hong Lim Park itself, well, Mr Ngerng is wrong as well, for Saturday’s CPF march/protest at the park is not the “first march since independence” held at the park either.
In 2013, the Association of Women for Action and Research (AWARE) commemorated International Women’s Day with a march and protest at the park calling for equality.
The news gave it scant attention but here is a video which The Online Citizen took of the event:

It is understandable that in times of great emotional controversy that things will be said and many claims made.
But it is equally important, after the emotions have settled, that we know what is fact, and what is driven by adrenalin and which may not necessarily be accurate, or true.
As for Mr Ngerng’s claims that Saturday’s protest was also “the first protest in front of a minister”, that too is not quite true, but we’ll leave that for another day.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Lta seeks public's input on color scheme for public buses under new BCM

The Land Transport Authority (LTA) is asking for members of the public…

MOH preliminarily confirms 86 new cases of COVID-19 infection; Total tally at 55,747

As of 16 August 2020, 12pm, the Ministry of Health (MOH) has…

穿凉鞋事件被批双重标准 星耀樟宜称员工疏忽

星耀樟宜被质疑以双重标准待客,一名母亲表示其儿子曾因为穿着凉鞋而被拒绝进入“雪道”景点,却有名人之子穿着凉鞋入场拍照,申诉不满。惟被指名人的本地DJ林佩芬澄清,并没有获得特殊待遇,而星耀樟宜也表示是“工作人员疏忽”,不持任何双重标准。 网民Kailin Ng,于本月3日在脸书上帖文指出,她日前和儿子艾登(Aden)到星耀樟宜星空花园(Canopy Park)的“雪道”(Snow Walk)景点游玩时,本想让孩子看看《冰雪奇缘》中的雪道景点,但是却发现该景点有限制,仅允许穿包鞋的访客入内使用,因此无法进入设施内。 然而数天后,Kailin却在社交媒体上看见本地著名电台主持人林佩芬分享了和孩子一起在“雪道”景点游玩的照片,惊见照片中的小男孩穿着凉鞋,而主持人则在凉鞋外套上鞋套,因此质疑当局在待客方面持有双标准。 Kailin的帖文立刻引起网民的关注,纷纷为她“打抱不平”。 面对有关指控,星耀樟宜和主持人都发言否认。 星耀樟宜:员工疏忽 星耀樟宜接受《8视界》询问时曾表示,当局的首要认为是确保访客能在最佳条件下享用设施,因此才会有要求访客穿上包鞋才能进入的限制。 “出现访客穿着凉鞋就进入雪道场景事件,则是工作人员的疏忽,已经提醒相关工作人员,要确保访客穿着符合规定的鞋子才能进入景点。” 星耀樟宜也表示已经让客户中心和Kailin联系,邀请他们母子在到访星耀樟宜。…

再增两病例 本地新型冠状病毒确诊病例累积七宗

卫生部今日(28日)宣称,我国再出现两起新型冠状病毒确诊病例,使之累积确诊病例增至共七起。 上述两宗新病例均来自中国武汉,一名56岁男子在本月19日抵达我国,随之在25日出现咳嗽症状。他在26日前往樟宜医院就诊,并在隔日确诊患有新型冠状病毒。 该部称病患在入院前呆在位于白沙林(Pasir Ris Grove)隔离。 至于第七宗病患为35岁男性,他在本月23日抵达新加坡;24日出现症状并前往莱佛士医院求医。他立即被转往国家传染病中心。他在27日晚上11时确诊患上新型冠状病毒。 在入院前,他曾待在滨海湾金沙酒店。 卫生部坦言来自中国湖北确诊病例有增长的趋势,95巴仙确诊病例均来自湖北省。 不过该部称目前未有证据显示病例有在社区扩散的迹象,惟这仍给我国带来风险。 对此政府跨部门工作小组,在今午(28日)召开记者会,宣布从明日中午开始,限制过去14天内,到过湖北、或持有湖北护照的旅客入境我国。 同时,立即停发签证给护照签发自湖北的人士。