Roy Ngerng, the blogger at the centre of a defamation suit filed by Lee Hsien Loong and who is also involved with the CPF protests in recent months, posted the following on his blog on 27 September.
r9
Mr Ngerng might have been carried away by the adrenalin from the previous day’s rowdy protest at Hong Lim Park (Speakers’ Corner), and made the erroneous – and rather inflated – claim that the protest was “the first march in Singapore since independence.”
The claim is not quite true, actually.
In fact, there have been not a few marches – whether at Hong Lim Park itself or in other public areas – in Singapore throughout the years, post-independence.
We highlight here some of the more prominent ones.
Barely one and a half months after our independence on 9 August 1965, Nanyang University students took to the streets and attempted to march in protest for the expulsion of 85 students from the university.
The police, however, halted the march before it started.
It was 30 October 1965:
nantah 1965
Then, a year later, on 12 October 1966, there was a protest march by some 1,000 University of Singapore students to “demand for university autonomy , academic freedom, and withdrawal of suitability certificates for freshmen.”
uos protest march
 
uosprotest2
Protest marches were not limited to those who were protesting against the authorities here.
The Singapore Government-affiliated National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) has mounted several protests too.
In June 1973, the NTUC organised a protest march to the French embassy here to express its concerns over the French’s nuclear tests in the pacific.
ntuc protest french 1
And on May 11, 1988, “the (NTUC) staged a massive protest involving 4,000 workers in Shenton Way to signal its unhappiness with the United States for interfering with Singapore’s domestic politics”, a Straits Times report in 2012 said.
“While some saw it as a strike, it was more of a public protest, said NTUC president emeritus John De Payva, who participated in it.”
Another report said the NTUC “drove buses around the U.S. embassy, held a rally attended by four thousand workers, and issued a statement deriding the U.S. as ‘sneaky, arrogant, and untrustworthy’.”
ntucprotest us
ntucprotestus2
In more recent times, perhaps the group most known for holding public protests and marches (attempted or otherwise) would be the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP).
The most famous attempt by the SDP at conducting a march would be the one in 2006, during the meeting of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) at Suntec City.
The SDP had planned to march from Hong Lim Park to the convention centre and Parliament house. However, they were surrounded and stopped by the police from doing so.
What transpired was a 3-day stand-off between the authorities and the political opposition party.
sdp
While the SDP may have failed to hold the march as it had planned that day, the party and its supporters were more successful three months later – when, wearing yellow t-shirts, it commemorated International Human Rights Day with a Freedom Walk from Speakers’ Corner to the Istana and to Changi Prison where the SDP leader, Dr Chee Soon Juan, was being incarcerated for speaking in public without a permit.
sdpwalk
Two years later, on 15 March 2008, the SDP held a march and protest on World Consumers’ Day (WCD), from Orchard Road to Parliament.
Along the way, however, the group was stopped and eventually arrested by the police.
Here is a video of the march:

The SDP’s WCD march was similar to the one held the previous year by the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE), also on World Consumer’s Day, in the downtown area.
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
The manner in which the two similar events were treated by the authorities gave rise to questions by members of the public. (Read here: “A CASE of double standards?”)
But Singaporeans were not the only ones who have held public marches and protests.
One example of foreigners getting in on this was the Orchard Road march-cum-protest by Burmese nationals in 2007, when Burma was in political turmoil as the military junta massacred its own people, including monks.
A group of Burmese working in Singapore decided to show solidarity with their countrymen back home and held a march in Orchard Road in December.

As for marches and protests in Hong Lim Park itself, well, Mr Ngerng is wrong as well, for Saturday’s CPF march/protest at the park is not the “first march since independence” held at the park either.
In 2013, the Association of Women for Action and Research (AWARE) commemorated International Women’s Day with a march and protest at the park calling for equality.
The news gave it scant attention but here is a video which The Online Citizen took of the event:

It is understandable that in times of great emotional controversy that things will be said and many claims made.
But it is equally important, after the emotions have settled, that we know what is fact, and what is driven by adrenalin and which may not necessarily be accurate, or true.
As for Mr Ngerng’s claims that Saturday’s protest was also “the first protest in front of a minister”, that too is not quite true, but we’ll leave that for another day.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

国防部网安事故:黄永宏称将加强对供应商监管框架

上月21日,国防部和武装部队的服务供应商电脑系统遭恶意软件入侵,导致人员资料面对外泄风险。 对此,国防部长黄永宏医生在本月6日的国会,答复议员提问时表示将加强对供应商的监管系统,采取网络安全分层框架,包括定期审查供应商,确保较敏感的数据能够得以保存。 他补充,国防部在事发前已采取一些保护措施,如在新合约加入个人资料保护条款,以及供应商将条款逐步纳入现有合约中。 但针对网络安全分层框架,当局并未有更多细节透露。 上月,国防部和武装部队的服务供应商电脑系统遭恶意软件入侵,两家供应商新康国际卫生科学院(HMI Institute)以及新科物流均受影响,其系统存有12万人员的个资,包括9万8000名国防部或武装部队人员的全名、身份证号。此外,还有新康国际其余客户的全名、身份证号、电邮、生日日期和住址等个资。 新康国际声称在发现软件的恶意攻击后立即切断网络,并让科技公司进行调查,而国防网络署署长陈庆利准则表示,国防部和武装部队的系统和运作均不受影响,但却存在泄漏人员各自和隐私,因此承诺将加强供应商的网安标准,确保人员个资的安全。

Neo Swee Lin and Lim Kay Siu sing a satirical Christmas song about CPF

Singapore’s veteran actor-actress husband and wife, Lim Kay Siu and Neo Swee…

【冠状病毒19】8月17日新增 确诊91,六例入境病例

根据卫生部文告,截至本月17日中午12时,本地新增冠91状病毒19确诊,入境病例六例,没有社区病例。 本地累计确诊已增至5万5838例。 新增病例大多是隔离中的宿舍客工,至于六例入境病例,再抵新后已遵守居家通知。