Roy Ngerng, the blogger at the centre of a defamation suit filed by Lee Hsien Loong and who is also involved with the CPF protests in recent months, posted the following on his blog on 27 September.
r9
Mr Ngerng might have been carried away by the adrenalin from the previous day’s rowdy protest at Hong Lim Park (Speakers’ Corner), and made the erroneous – and rather inflated – claim that the protest was “the first march in Singapore since independence.”
The claim is not quite true, actually.
In fact, there have been not a few marches – whether at Hong Lim Park itself or in other public areas – in Singapore throughout the years, post-independence.
We highlight here some of the more prominent ones.
Barely one and a half months after our independence on 9 August 1965, Nanyang University students took to the streets and attempted to march in protest for the expulsion of 85 students from the university.
The police, however, halted the march before it started.
It was 30 October 1965:
nantah 1965
Then, a year later, on 12 October 1966, there was a protest march by some 1,000 University of Singapore students to “demand for university autonomy , academic freedom, and withdrawal of suitability certificates for freshmen.”
uos protest march
 
uosprotest2
Protest marches were not limited to those who were protesting against the authorities here.
The Singapore Government-affiliated National Trades Union Congress (NTUC) has mounted several protests too.
In June 1973, the NTUC organised a protest march to the French embassy here to express its concerns over the French’s nuclear tests in the pacific.
ntuc protest french 1
And on May 11, 1988, “the (NTUC) staged a massive protest involving 4,000 workers in Shenton Way to signal its unhappiness with the United States for interfering with Singapore’s domestic politics”, a Straits Times report in 2012 said.
“While some saw it as a strike, it was more of a public protest, said NTUC president emeritus John De Payva, who participated in it.”
Another report said the NTUC “drove buses around the U.S. embassy, held a rally attended by four thousand workers, and issued a statement deriding the U.S. as ‘sneaky, arrogant, and untrustworthy’.”
ntucprotest us
ntucprotestus2
In more recent times, perhaps the group most known for holding public protests and marches (attempted or otherwise) would be the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP).
The most famous attempt by the SDP at conducting a march would be the one in 2006, during the meeting of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) at Suntec City.
The SDP had planned to march from Hong Lim Park to the convention centre and Parliament house. However, they were surrounded and stopped by the police from doing so.
What transpired was a 3-day stand-off between the authorities and the political opposition party.
sdp
While the SDP may have failed to hold the march as it had planned that day, the party and its supporters were more successful three months later – when, wearing yellow t-shirts, it commemorated International Human Rights Day with a Freedom Walk from Speakers’ Corner to the Istana and to Changi Prison where the SDP leader, Dr Chee Soon Juan, was being incarcerated for speaking in public without a permit.
sdpwalk
Two years later, on 15 March 2008, the SDP held a march and protest on World Consumers’ Day (WCD), from Orchard Road to Parliament.
Along the way, however, the group was stopped and eventually arrested by the police.
Here is a video of the march:

The SDP’s WCD march was similar to the one held the previous year by the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE), also on World Consumer’s Day, in the downtown area.
OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
The manner in which the two similar events were treated by the authorities gave rise to questions by members of the public. (Read here: “A CASE of double standards?”)
But Singaporeans were not the only ones who have held public marches and protests.
One example of foreigners getting in on this was the Orchard Road march-cum-protest by Burmese nationals in 2007, when Burma was in political turmoil as the military junta massacred its own people, including monks.
A group of Burmese working in Singapore decided to show solidarity with their countrymen back home and held a march in Orchard Road in December.

As for marches and protests in Hong Lim Park itself, well, Mr Ngerng is wrong as well, for Saturday’s CPF march/protest at the park is not the “first march since independence” held at the park either.
In 2013, the Association of Women for Action and Research (AWARE) commemorated International Women’s Day with a march and protest at the park calling for equality.
The news gave it scant attention but here is a video which The Online Citizen took of the event:

It is understandable that in times of great emotional controversy that things will be said and many claims made.
But it is equally important, after the emotions have settled, that we know what is fact, and what is driven by adrenalin and which may not necessarily be accurate, or true.
As for Mr Ngerng’s claims that Saturday’s protest was also “the first protest in front of a minister”, that too is not quite true, but we’ll leave that for another day.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

被裁员职业类别中占比仍高 PMET成劳动市场新弱势群体?

根据人力部最新的劳动力报告,尽管被裁退人数有所下降,但专业人士、经理、执行员与技师(professionals, managers, executives and technicians,简称PMET)却占了被裁员人数中的大部分,从1440人增至1680人。 该报告揭露,被裁退人数由第一季度的3230人,下跌至第二季度的2320人。 但大部分被裁退人数为PMET人士,一半以上的被裁退员工握有大专文凭,而且七成的人已年过40岁。 2019年上半年PMET被裁员总数,多达3120人。而根据今年4月人力部长杨莉明在国会答复,在2018年,有5400位本地PMET被裁员。 星展银行经济学家谢光威(Irvin Seah),接受《雅虎新闻》采访时曾表示,PMET领域裁员人数比其他劳动力更高。2018年数据显示,PMET的劳动力占了57巴仙。对此,谢光威将PMET视为”新弱势群体“,并指出尽管PMET属于专业技能,并获得相当优秀的资格,但其人力淘汰率在过去九年中一直持续上升。 此外,说到重新进入劳动力,谢光威也表示PMET的表现“持续低下”,根据数据显示,PMET人士在被裁员后半年,重新进入职场的仅达57.8巴仙。其中之因素为薪资的落差,谢光威指出,因为PMET属于白领阶级的专业人士,通常的薪资要求会更高,以支持他们的生活,但显然已产生变化。 被裁银行职员 …

面包夹香烟最新暗黑早餐? 面包内藏私烟闯关被抓包

“有人要试试香烟三文治吗?” 移民与关卡局在脸书分享一则趣事,本月8日,该局官员在兀兰关卡发现,在巴士站入境厅有旅客行迹可疑,于是趋前要求检查。 这位马来西亚籍52岁男子,带着四包面包,但官员打开后,却发现内有乾坤,面包片中共藏着32包走私烟! 有关男子在接受调查后,已转交给新加坡关税局(Singapore Custom)处置。 有网民表示没见过这么奇葩的走私香烟手段,令网民打开眼界。 不久前,当局也曾从货柜罗厘,在放置包装纸巾的箱子内藏有私烟。