By Howard Lee
Citing recent concerns from citizens over the Central Provident Fund, the National Solidarity Party (NSP) published a paper to outline its position on the pension fund, with the aim of providing greater clarity in how CPF can meet the needs of retirees.
Describing the recent debate on CPF as “an atmosphere where there is more heat than light”, NSP said that populist and reactionary proposals would not be able to resolve the issues that citizens are concerned about.
“NSP believes that in this present crisis of broken faith in the CPF Scheme, a Principled Approach will help Singaporeans to better rationalise the complexities and to regain trust and belief in the benefits of the CPF Scheme.”
The party outlined six broad principles in its proposal, which it believed will allow the government to navigate the complexities of the CPF system and provide greater clarity to CPF members.
The broad principles are also followed by six initiatives to reform the CPF system.
The broad principles of the plan recognised the need for employers to be an integral part of the CPF system; to focus on supplementing retirement income rather than retirement adequacy; options for members to control their CPF contribution rates through their income; to view CPF as a tripartite responsibility; usage of CPF as a macro-economic tool; and for the government to top-up the retirement savings for low-income earners.

6-6
NSP’s 6/6 Foresight plan for the CPF system.
The proposed solutions include the phasing out of the minimum sum, a review of the lowered contribution rate of older workers, and restoring employer’s contributions rate.
NSP also proposed for a better segregation of contributions, such that employees contribute to their ordinary accounts while employers contribute to Medisave and their Special Account.
“NSP believes that our 6 Broad Principles and 6 Principled Proposals will rid the CPF Scheme of unnecessary complexities and give Members greater peace of mind about their CPF savings.”
CPF continues to be an issue of concern among citizens, with protesters continuing to occupy Hong Lim Park to voice displeasure about the system.
Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong is slated to make an announcement for changes to CPF in his National Day rally, which will happen this Sunday.
Images – National Solidarity Party website

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

国大设委会检讨整治不当行为纪律框架

根据新加坡国立大学发给校内师生的一则电邮显示,国大校董会主席谢福华,已指示成立一个以校董郭运光女士为首的委员会,以检讨国大针对性骚扰等不当行为的纪律程序和支援框架。 谢福华在信中表示,校董会严正看待校园内出现的性骚扰不当行为。有关委会成员也包括新加坡管理大学校长江莉莉教授、国大校长陈永财教授、国大校董会董事和王律师事务所LLP执行合伙人吴伟权,和一名国大学生会的学生代表。 郭运光自2008年4月起,即成为国大校董之一,同时她也是英国伦敦一家律师事务所的律师,同时为她的家族事业工作,也是香格里拉酒店执行主席。 与此同时,郭运光也是耶鲁-国立大学学院的董事会主席、国家医疗保健集团董事成员;积极参与一些机构和社会团体职务,例如新加坡旅游局、西南社区发展理事会、国家艺术委员会、国家环境局等等。 谢福华表示“了解到强烈的群众诉求”,保证上述委员会将“迅速和果断地”检讨问题。 国大前硕士生非议委会人选 不过,对于委会人选名单也有网民提出非议,其中一位曾卷入与国大长达五年诉讼抗争的田柳金(Jeanne-Marie Ten 译音),在其中一则脸书留言中不客气抨击江莉莉教授,指后者“曾包庇犯错者”,不适合成为有关检讨委员会的一员。 田柳金过去曾是国大设计与环境学院的硕士生,2002年入学。不过她指其导师于2004年利用她的学术研究成果,为一项个人学术作业申请津贴,尔后获教育部八万元津贴。但是之后导师拒绝在该报告中加入田的名字。 此事发生时,江莉莉教授执掌国大副教务长一职。担心学术职涯受影响,当时田柳金也曾要求换导师,不过她指责校方站在导师一方,几经投诉都不得要领,她投诉到副教务长后,校方才召开调查委员会调查此事。 田柳金在2005年2月完成论文,但她表示数月后国大开出让田毕业的新条件:必须接受大学对于导师的处置。而田柳金的准硕士资格也2006年9月被剥夺。…

Section 377A of Penal Code upheld in Constitutional challenge

  The Court of Appeal today rejected two separate Constitutional challenges to…

回国后仍外出吃肉骨茶 男子被判坐牢六周

日前,33岁业余摄影师被指回国后仍外出食用肉骨茶和到超市;他在今日(23日)被判坐牢六周,成为因在疫情期间,首位因不遵守居家通知而被定罪的人士。 上月23日,他刚从缅甸返抵樟宜机场,下午3点29分通关后,就接到居家通知。不过他在接受媒体访问时,曾表示以为居家通知隔日才生效,才会外出,也为此致歉。 当时他和来接机的女友到第三搭客大厦的Kopitiam食阁用餐,再前往柏岭大厦换钱,搭私召车回到家时已经是傍晚6时许。 不过,他再晚上8时27分,仍和女友搭巴士前往兀兰第71通道海军部队庄(Kampung Admiralty)的职总富食客(Foodfare)吃肉骨茶,还发布照片到社交媒体,结果引起网民热议,提醒他一旦接到居家通知,就不得外出。  

Government to give $100 a day to those who have to be quarantined

To ease the financial burden, the Government will provide financial assistance for…