HDB notice for dog owners
A photo of what seems to be a notice by the Housing Development Board, Ang Mo Kio Branch has been circulated online. The notice writes that the branch received feedback about a dog barking in the middle of the night at Block 601, Ang Mo Kio Ave 5.
The notice also reminded dog owners to take proper care of their dogs and not to let them create nuisance for other residents.

SPCA's webpage indicating the breeds of dogs approved by HDB.
SPCA’s webpage indicating the breeds of dogs approved by HDB.
The response to the HDB’s notice has been largely negative due to the suggestion that dog owners might consider the surgery procedure of debarking to keep the barking of their dogs under control. There were also suggestions dog owners might use training collars to control the barking.
Most of the comments posted online condemned the notice. One commenter said, “I find it rather disturbing… so this is what we should teach our kids about dogs who bark?”
“How can they write this!” wrote another. “Naturally dog barks and we human talk. So if we talk too loud or shout too loud we must go surgery? Inhumane.”
However, there were also those who defended HDB. “Its not right of HDB but the owners are to blame. I love dogs but it can be damn annoying they just can’t stop barking esp when people are trying to rest. It all boils down to the damn owner!”
Debarking is a surgical procedure performed by a veterinarian in which a section of a dog’s vocal cord is removed to reduce the volume of its bark. Debarking does not eliminate the sound of the bark completely. Sometimes the dog can also regain its bark should the vocal cord regenerate.
Agri-Food & Veterinary Authority of Singapore (AVA) states in its educational materials that debarking should be considered as a solution of last resort.
HDB can deny the dog owner the right to keep the dog at the residence, should it choose to act on feedback from neighbours who are unhappy with the dog, even if the dog is on its approved list and has been licensed by AVA.
Neighbours who dislike dogs have shown to be unsympathetic when it comes to complaining to HDB on such matters as seen in the story of Mr Tan Cheng Chuan, who was asked to give up one of his two dogs while being terminally ill.
Mr Tan’s case drew the attention of Law Minister Mr K Shanmugum, who remarked that, “A bit of compassion and sympathy will go a long way but some amongst us can only think of ourselves, and can’t even consider the wishes of Mr Tan, who is very ill.”
What dogs sound like when they are debarked:

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

DPM Heng Swee Keat will be Acting Prime Minister as PM Lee goes on leave

As of today (10 June), Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong will be…

China man bashed for ‘talking too loudly’ on bus

Accused of talking too loudly on a bus, Chinese national Mr Liu Tie was beaten up by a fellow passenger. His injuries included ‘a swollen eye and scratches on his neck’, according to The New Paper. Share your views on this incident here.

企图贿赂公寓保安放行旅客 女租户被判监禁一周

根据新加坡贪污调查局今日(28日)发布的声明,指一名公寓租户,透过Airbnb非法出租单位给旅客。她企图贿赂保安,希望后者放行让旅客入住,结果遭到保安人员举报。 这名女子在今年7月19日面对两项贿赂控状,指她涉嫌以100元,贿赂两名公寓保安人员,希望后者不要把她非法短租的事,上报给公寓管理层。 名为李依霖的女子租下了太平洋大厦(Pacific Mansion)的单位,然后透过共享空间网站Airbnb,把单位短租给一组旅客。 当游客抵达太平洋大厦时,向公寓保安莫哈末沙柏(Sapah)索讨公寓钥匙。沙柏知情后,立即联系李依霖,告知她不可将单位短期出租。再者这么做是犯法的(私人公寓业主出租房屋租期,需至少三个月以上) 较后李依霖抵达现场,她把两张50元夹在黑色文件夹内,交给沙柏和另一名保安阿布巴卡,希望他们不要把此事举报给大厦管理层。 不过保安人员没有遵从,反之将此事举报给贪污调查局,两名保安人员还获得当局嘉许。 贪污调查局强调贿赂是严重罪行,一旦罪成可面对最高10万元罚款,以及最高五年监禁,或两者兼施。  

61-year-old man and young girl hit by car making discretionary right turn at pedestrian crossing in Bukit Batok

A 61-year-old man and a young girl were crossing a road junction…