CPF protest Aug
By Terry Xu
A crowd of around 900 individuals turned up for the protest about the Central Provident Fund (CPF) at Speakers’ Corner, Hong Lim Park last Saturday, organised by Ms Han Hui Hui and her team.
Speakers at the event touched on issues that went beyond CPF, including the Housing Development Board (HDB), influx of foreign workers and other areas concerning citizens.
This is the third CPF protest event since June this year and there is still no sign that the organisers will be stopping any time soon. Ms Han, the main organiser, announced that there will be another protest next month on 27 September at Speakers’ Corner.
A sizable number of elderly folks made up the crowd. While the first impression might be that the elders turned up because they are concerned about their CPF funds, further questioning debunked that assumption.
Many of the elderly who turned up at the protest event have already received their CPF funds in part or in full. Many also said that they have nothing on CPF which worries them. Rather, they are concerned about how government policies will impact future generations.
Mdm Tan, 71, spoke passionately about her support for event organiser Ms Han and speakers like Mr Roy Ngerng. She admired their courage in stepping up on stage to voice out against the government’s policies.
She related that many, including her peers and herself, are afraid of the repercussion of speaking against the government, even of they do not agree with the policies. She withheld her name out of fear that her son will be implicated in some way.
Mdm Tan was also concerned that Singaporeans are worse off now than they were during her time.
“Just imagine that my mother, who was totally uneducated as a farmer, could raise me up to go through university. The British gave us primary education for free and secondary school at only $$2.50 per month. Even the bus fares were cheap, at 10 cents a ride. With seven to nine bus companies, the competition between the companies made the fares low.”
She also felt that housing prices are ridiculously high, too high for the next generation to afford. She related that she brought her 3-room flat at around S$7,000 and lamented how high the price has gone since then.
However, she recalled how her Residents’ Committee members boasted to her about how they skipped the balloting process to get their choice of flats. She was concerned about preferential treatment given to supporters of the ruling political party.
She also took issue with how the government had been forceful on their policies, citing the “Stop at Two” policy (a scheme in the 1960’s to encourage parents not to have too many babies) and how the government had forced people to give up their homes in the name of national development.
“But things have changed now, with young people like Hui Hui daring to go on stage to talk about the government’s policies,” said Mdm Tan.
Speech by Leong Sze Hian, one of the speakers at the protest event on HDB issues.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

妇女指单位有问题 投诉没人理! 建屋局等单位澄清

妇女在社媒上投诉单位出现漏水及污水、发出恶臭现象,向建屋发展局投诉后没有下文,当局昨日强调“绝无此事”。 建屋局指出,该妇女自2015年首次就有关现象进行投诉,当局也到现场展开多次调查。“调查显示,排污系统或其他部位并没有任何瑕疵,不可能导致单位内出现恶臭……新加坡公用事业局(PUB)也到单位进行水质检测,结果显示水可以安全饮用。” 杰拉尔丁(Geraldine Tang)女士是于本月4日在脸书上帖文,指在其邻居使用厕所后,她所居住的私人组屋(DBSS)内就充满了恶臭。 她在帖文内附上了单位照片,包括一间浴室,指该浴室“近乎24小时又臭又热……五年来的上下楼层的高温、虫子和湿气已经严重将它损坏” 。 在杰拉尔丁的长篇帖文中,她投诉在邻居打开空调或热水器时,她家的卧室的地板就会变得“又冷又湿”,而且自来水内的细菌也引起了她的皮肤问题。 据建屋局和公用事业局指出,杰拉尔丁女士曾经在之前的两件住家做出类似投诉。而目前,她居住在勿洛蓄水池湾一带的百丽湾。 建屋局在脸书发帖指出,当局已就有关投诉展开调查,所有的配件和材料都是正确的。“负责杰拉尔丁女士住家的室内空气素质调查专家指出,因为室内门窗处于关闭状况,导致通风不良以及室内高温高湿。” “我们还察觉到,室内地板和墙壁都被多个清洁化学品清理和消毒过。专家指出,室内微生物的生长可能是因通风不良和长期过度清洗所致。” “但是,该名女士没有听从专家建议,让单位通风。” 建屋局建议居民不要使用过量自来水清洗单位,应该使用湿布擦拭墙壁上的污垢污渍,在清理地板后打开窗户,保持通风。…

SBF survey: Half of Singaporean firms expects business conditions to deteriorate in 2020

In the wake of the contracting economic climate and global uncertainties, local…

Public Transport: Uniquely Singapore, F1 or F9?

In light of the just-announced increase in transport fares (again), theonlinecitizen has…

Statement by civil society on MDA's decision to ban local film, "To Singapore, with love"

On 10th September 2014, Media Development Authority (MDA) announced that it has classified…