By Aloysius Chia
Recently, it was announced during the National Day Rally that the Lease Buyback Scheme will be extended to four-room flats.
Although details are still forthcoming, there seems to be a detail that seems to be missed entirely, and scarcely mentioned.
Inherent in the scheme is the idea to allow those who have retired or who are elderly and poor, to provide a means of sustenance for themselves when they are old, using it to supplement for their lack of income. It is meant to allow the elderly to ‘unlock part of their housing equity’, according to the Housing Development Board’s webpage about the scheme.
But there is nothing remarkable about the scheme that is anything new. This is because what is meant to sound like a type of assistance by the government, is actually one in which the poor elderly sell their own assets in order to fund the rest of their retirement.
According to Singstats, in 2013, 9.4% of resident households have no persons working, and 24% of all Singaporeans live in three-room HDB flats or smaller.
These households that have at least one family member employed earn an average of S$976 per month for those living in one- or two-room flats, and $2,216 for those in three-room flats, including CPF per employed person. That puts the average working person staying in these flats in the range of the 11th to 50th percentile of income.
But given that one of the eligibility criteria for the scheme is age 63, which is also at the same time the retirement age set by most companies, it can be assumed that most who resort to the Lease Buyback Scheme do not already have a steady source of income.
This is considering the fact that a flat will continue to appreciate in value if one still has a long term lease.
The scheme requires one to put what is gained from giving up a part of the term in order to meet the minimum sum (now S$155,000 for those aged 70 and below) into the purchase of a CPF Life plan that will provide an annuity until death.
Someone who takes up the scheme will leave 30 years of lease remaining in the flat. If the person dies within this period, the spouse or child may choose to live the remaining term, or the remaining amount paid to nominees, and the flat eventually goes back to HDB.
In effect, the scheme is encouraging those at the bottom third of the population who are more likely to take up the scheme to otherwise forgo what would be an appreciating and wealth enhancing asset.
Rather than wanting the bottom strata of society to retain their assets so that they could put it to future use and pass it on to the next generation, so as to prevent inequality from reproducing itself from one generation to the next, the government is instead introducing a scheme that does nothing for them, other than repackaging what they already own.
For future generations of the lower strata, whose opportunities are already limited by the mere fact that they earn below average incomes, or do not start at the same starting point as others, they will find that forgoing appreciating wealth is not a good idea.
Yet, why won’t the government just leave the poor alone, since this scheme simply prevents intergenerational wealth from accumulating?
Is the aim of the government to quickly end the lease of these people staying in three-room flats or smaller, so that their houses can be put up for more economically productive development?
The scheme brings forth all the ironies and bitter realities of staying in an HDB flat. It is not really a home, if you think about it, but a place that you rent for a long term and eventually exchange for “schemes”. Couples and other people who spend their life paying for it find that it doesn’t last very long after that.
Image – screen capture from Housing Development Board corporate video
Like this article? Support us so that we can do more. Subscribe to TOC here.

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Indonesian govt to ban “mudik” for Hari Raya in order to curb the spread of COVID-19

Indonesian government will finally ban the tradition of mudik, or returning to…

Freedom and its Limits: A Conversation with Rex Bloomstein

The Online Citizen speaks to Rex Bloomstein, director of The Prison Where…

Grab 未来5年斥资五亿美元投资越南市场

线上私召车服务公司Grab ,于周三(28日)表示将会在未来五年斥资五亿美元(约6亿9428万新元)投资越南市场,并表明该越南将是未来在东南亚主推的市场之一。 Grab近年来迅速发展,业务范围横跨8个东南地区包括马来西亚、印尼、新加坡、缅甸、泰国、菲律宾、柬埔寨与越南,其总部则建立在马来西亚雪兰莪州八打灵再也,以及新加坡。自去年,美国劲敌忧步公司(Uber)同意将东南亚业务,包括乘车与食品递送业务都出售于Grab,迅速扩张了Grab的发展。 自2014年进入越南以来,Grab亦斥资逾两亿美元(约2亿7774万新元)打入越南市场,而新的投资将会用于推出新的服务,如金融科技、物流服务以及扩大现有运输、食物和支付产品。 越南是近年来经济增长最快的东南亚地区,目前已有接近一亿人口。 Grab在过去一年中获得了超过45亿美元(约62亿4935万新元)的投资,包含丰田(Toyota)、现代(Hyundai)和微软(Microsoft)等大厂均为Grab提供金援。 上个月,Grab也曾表示将在未来5年斥资20亿美元(约27亿7747万新元),投入到印尼,试图与当地召车服务GoJek竞争,其部分资金是来自日本软银集团(SoftBank Group) 。 该公司欲发展更全面的业务,目前正在扩展包括金融服务, 食品和包裹递送业务,以及增加新的产品,如点播视频,保险和酒店预订。