By Tiffany Gwee
A post on the Facebook page of a group calling itself, “We are against PinkDot in Singapore”, has attracted controversy.
The post was apparently an email reply from the National Library Board (NLB) indicating that two books have been removed from library shelves as they were deemed to be not “pro-family”.
The two children’s books in question are “And Tango Makes Three” by Peter Parnell and Justin Richardson, and “The White Swan Express” by Jean Davies Okimoto.
And Tango Makes Three is based on the true story of two male Chinstrap Penguins in New York’s Central Park Zoo. The book narrates the six years of their life when they formed a couple and were given an egg to raise.
The White Swan Express tells the stories of four baby girls from a Chinese orphanage and the families which adopt them. The families include that of a lesbian couple.NLB non pro family books removed FB post
In the letter, NLB’s chief librarian Tay Ai Cheng explained that the books were removed after feedback from the public.
“I would like to assure you that NLB takes a strong pro-family stand in selecting books for children,” said Ms Tay. “We take a cautions approach in identifying titles for our young visitors.”
“Besides going through the contents, we also refer to synopses, reviews and other books written by the authors,” she added.
“While we try to sieve through the contents and exercise our best judgement, it is an arduous task to ensure complete adherence of details in the books to our pro-family stand. However, when library visitors like yourself highlight to us any conflicting content within books, we review such books thoroughly and withdraw them from circulation.”
In response to a media query, NLB said that “young children are among our libraries’ most frequent visitors. Many of them browse books in our children’s sections on their own. As such, NLB takes a pro-family and cautious approach in identifying titles for our young visitors.”
It did not reply to queries by the press on how many complaints were received about the titles and why the titles were offered in the first place.
Many members on the “We are against PinkDot in Singapore” Facebook page praised NLB for removing the books.
“We appreciate your staff for doing their best to keep our core values,” Vincent Chun said.
Another member Marianne Su asked the community “to be alert and sieve through the content when (they) borrow books for (their) kids.”
However, NLB’s action also drew criticismsfrom others online.
In the comment section of a local news report about this incident, user Roy Tan questioned the purpose served “by making (our) children ignorant of scientific fact and social diversity.”
“On one hand, we encourage them to be creative; on the other, we censor depictions of diversity and tolerance. How can we achiever greatness as a nation with this schizophrenic and parochial mindset born of paranoia?”
User Leandro Ngo argued that the books “serve as a gentle jumping off point for discussions between parents and children on the diversity of family structures”.
Some users who commented added that this is “unfair discrimination” and firmly believed that the books should be reinstated.
User Cedric Evan-ezer asked, “Why are random people allowed to dictate what we should or should not choose to read?”
Writer Kirsten Han also criticised the move.
“A library is a community’s repository of literature, culture and knowledge,” she said. “It is a place that anyone should be able to access, to read and to learn. It is incredibly worrying that our national library would cave so quickly and so easily in circumscribing the knowledge that Singaporeans – even the little ones – can access.”
In a response letter she wrote to NLB, activist Rachel Zeng said “atypical family units” have been wrongly misunderstood and discriminated for far too long.
“Having been an early childhood educator for the past 10 years,” she said. “I have met and worked with children from different family backgrounds.”
“It is highly important that educators make the effort to create an inclusive learning environment that encourages acceptance and respect for one another. Furthermore it is the responsibility of educators to expose our students to concepts that exist in reality, in order to inculcate a sense of acceptance and respect for diversity within the local and global communities. This is one of the key purposes of education.”
—————–


What the two books are about…

and-tango-makes-three
Roy and Silo are called chinstrap penguins because of the delicate line of black feathers that loops under their beaks, as if to hold a hat in place. After years of living side by side in the Central Park Zoo, they discovered each other in 1998 and they have been a couple ever since. Tango, their only chick, was born from an egg laid by another penguin couple named Betty and Porkey. That couple had often hatched their own eggs, but they had never been able to care for more than one at a time. In 2000, when Betty laid two fertile eggs, Rob Gramzay decided to give Roy, Silo, and one of those eggs a chance to become a family. If you go to the Central Park Zoo, you can see Tango and her parents splashing about in the penguin house along with their friends, including Nipper, Squawk, Charlie, Wasabi, and Piwi. There are forty-two chinstrap penguins in the Central Park Zoo and over ten million chinstraps in the world. But there is only one Tango.
And Tango Makes Three has won many awards – including the American Library Association Notable Children’s Book Award and the Bank Street Best Book of the Year in 2006.
[youtube id=”WyPjUa908hM” align=”center”]  
the-white-swan-express
The White Swan Express depicts the challenges faced by families who adopt children. “In China, the moon shines on four baby girls, fast asleep in an orphanage. Far away in North America, the sun rises over four homes as the people who live there get ready to start a long, exciting journey. This lovely story of people who travel to China to be united with their daughters describes the adoption process step by step and the anxiety, suspense, and delight of becoming a family.”
Cover photo taken from NLB
Editor note: Correction made on description of White Swan Express. 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

一窥台北公共住宅新政 只租不卖 用十年让房价合理化

台湾住宅自有率高达80巴仙,当地民众同样也抱有“拥屋”心态,租房通常知识在有能力置产前的过渡阶段。 然而,当地私人租屋市场向来不被政府重视,致使诟病衍生,除了不合理的租房价格,一些房东把一些原本就不适合居住的空间,如天台和地下室改造称租房空间,将租房利润最大化;此外,租户还得面对各种租屋歧视,使得特定群体很难找到租房。 租房居住品质和房客权益缺乏保障,加之被炒高的房价,致使民众提出“居住正义”的诉求。为此,当地政府才会出台“只租不卖”的社会住宅,以低于市价的租金提供给青年、弱势群体,让房屋回归到居住的基本需求。 台北市长柯文哲曾打着“四年完成两万户社会住宅”的竞选承诺,上任后也积极落实,当前,已落成并有住户入住的公共住宅达到三处。 只要户籍和学籍在台北,就可抽签申请公宅。不过当前已落成的仅约一千户,柯文哲认为,只有完成所有两万户后,申请者抽签中签率才较高。 而在今年年底前,全台北将有32至35处、约两万户的公共住宅动工。 在接受当地网络媒体采访,市长柯文哲介绍新建好的公共住宅。小型一房式住宅租金大约7100台币,折合新元约为315元,这还不包括政府将提供的租金补贴。价格虽然可负担,但是在房屋素质和舒适度并未妥协,打出“智慧住宅”概念,所有住宅都有配备温度计、照度计、智慧保全和智慧对讲机。 每个住宅都能链接网络,因为柯文哲认为,穷人没有办法链接网络,根本没机会翻身。他们必须要有管道接触知识资源。在台北,国小三年级以上都可以免费使用网络。 公共住宅也附有社区空间,如跑步跑道和可以种菜田园空间等等,以期打造“田园城市”。 36坪的三房式住宅价格在减免前为两万一千台币,依据台北租房市价,至少介于3万5千至4万台币(折合新币1千700元)。 公共住宅价格比市价稍低,柯文哲的概念是让整体台北的房价缓步重归稳定合理。“如果房价突然下挫,会导致市场大乱,所以宁可用十年的时间让房价合理化。”  …

缓解医护人员焦虑情绪 政府派予私人诊所百万口罩

政府关注抗疫前线人员需求,将为私人诊所提供100万个口罩,让他们能够在库存充足之下,能“无后顾之忧”地照顾有需要的病患。 卫生部长颜金勇昨日(2月12日)的记者会上,除了公布我国2019冠状病毒确诊病患以及治愈出院的人数增加之外,也表示政府了解前线抗疫人员对口罩供应不足感到焦虑,因此作出以上决定。 他表示政府会将所有必要用品作出妥善安排,并将在不久后公布派发细节。 颜金勇对处于前线的医护人员们表示感激,尤其是全科家庭医生,甚至需要在农历新年假期期间开诊,而且他们是政府在前线的最重要伙伴之一,在检测和处理疫情方面扮演着重要角色。 针对近日频频发生医护人员受到部分社会人士“冷言冷语”、驱赶下车的对待,颜金勇表示,虽然理解人们对于国内新冠疫情的发展感到焦虑,为自身和家人的安全感到担忧,进而对医护人员生出警惕心,但是,他促请国人不要回避医护人员。 他呼吁人们应该在这非常时期团结一致,给予医护人员支持和打气,让他们有动力继续照顾新冠患者及其他病人,也能帮助到社会上的大众。

王乙康: 三年期间,六所大学处理56起性行为不端案

教育部长王乙康周一(5月6日)指出,本地六所自主大学(AUs)在3年期间,共处理42起校园内不端性行为案件,另有14起涉及学生的案件发生在校园外。 2015年发生了17宗案件,2016年18宗,而2017年21宗。 56宗案件中,新加坡国立大学(NUS)占了25宗,2宗发生在拥有自家纪律委员会的耶鲁新加坡国立大学,20宗发生在南洋理工大学(NTU),以及6宗发生在新加坡管理大学(SMU)。新加坡科技设计大学(STUD)、新加坡理工学院(SIT)和新加坡社会科学大学(SUSS)各一宗。 王乙康表示,其中37宗案件涉及偷拍和录影弱势群体。 部长在回应国会议员林谋泉和朱倍庆,以及非选区议员贝理安(Leon Perera)询问有关发生在自主大学,涉及学生的不端性行为案件数据和大学教学纪律框架时,如是指出。 他表示,每间自主大学发生的案例与其学生数量有密切关系。他说道,在过去三年中,每1000名学生中涉及不端性行为案件的学生犯罪者比例为0.21、0.21和0.2,显示“没有明显的增加趋势”。 两方展开调查和惩罚 56宗案件中,37宗案件的受害者向警方报案。四宗案件尚在调查中,两宗案件没有足够证据提出控诉。剩下的31宗案件中,10宗属于“严重罪行”,且被判入狱10天至8个月之间,这包括了暴力对待受害者和多次窥视案件。 除了警方调查,校方也展开纪律处分程序,并在其权利范围内进行一系列处罚。王乙康指出,有关的处罚包括了官方谴责,将直接影响到学生的正式教学记录上,导致停学和开除学籍。 56宗案件中,有五宗正在等待进行纪律听证会,而有四名学生在接受制裁前,已经退学。 在剩下的47宗案件中,34宗案件接到官方谴责,26宗被罚长达两个学期的停学处分,而20宗的干案者直接被禁止步入学生宿舍。王乙康表示,有关的数据加起来并不是47宗,因为多数案件接受一系列处罚。…

Latest statement by Sajeev Kamalasanan

Statement from Sajeev Kamalasanan on public’s reactions to his resignation from The…