ariffin
By Terry Xu
Like the year before, graduate of First Toa Payoh Secondary, Ariffin Sha was preparing to return to his former school to help out with its involvement in the National Day celebrations. He was former parade commander and also vice president of the student council.
This year was different, as his teacher told him that he need not come to help because the parade will be on a smaller scale.
This sounds fairly normal, until Ariffin started to hear other opinions about why his alma mater no longer needed his help.
image from lenneyHe was told by his former teacher that he can no longer enter the school premises without the approval of the principal.
And soon after, he got to know from about eight other friends who were still studying at the school that they have been asked about their relationship with him and whether he has ever spoken to them on political issues.
They were asked questions such as, “Are you close to Ariffin?”, or “Did Ariffin talk about politics to you guys?”
Ariffin had recently been active in the social political arena, voicing out on social issues online and speaking at events in Hong Lim Park. His views dealt mostly with government policies.
His friends said they did not know why the school had to ask such questions, and  were very puzzled about why Ariffin should be treated in such a manner.
Two friends from the group of students had also volunteered with him for his community project and were also questioned about their voluntary work with Ariffin. They said that they understood where the school was coming from in terms of safety and responsibility of the students, even though they volunteered in their personal capacity. But they could not understand why they were asked questions about Ariffin himself.
According to Ariffin, no other fellow Alumni members were told that their services at the school were no longer required.
The school principal, Mr Lim Kok Hwa, arranged for a meeting with Ariffin on a Saturday to address his concerns over the issue. Ariffin had informed his principal that the contents of the meeting would not be private and confidential.
During the meeting, the principal assured him that he was not being barred from the school compound. He explained that the school was merely exercising security measures due to the recent spate of sex-for-grades cases. He also said that the teacher who told Ariffin he would require the principal’s approval before he can enter the school misunderstood what he said.
However, Mr Lim did not address the issue of why Ariffin’s friends were questioned about their relationship with him and whether he spoke to them on political matters.
TOC sent queries to First Toa Payoh Secondary School and the Ministry of Education last week, to confirm if Ariffin has indeed been denied entry to the school compound as alumni, or if other alumni members have also been treated similarl. We have yet to receive a response from the school or MOE, and will include their response in this report when they reply.
Ariffin said that he hopes what happened to him will not continue, because quite a number of secondary school students have expressed to him their interests in political involvement.
Questions remain about whether Ariffin was indeed ostracised by his school for his contrarian views on national policies, as his fellow students are now left wondering if they would be treated the same way should they do likewise. Would it have a chilling effect on active citizenry among those he know?
Images of Ariffin volunteering with the Extend the Feast community project organised by the Happy People Helping People Foundation. Ariffin was the organiser for the Toa Payoh area for the distribution of food.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

竞选期间破坏政党海报 两男遭提控

2020年大选竞选期间,包括前进党、人民行动党都针对选举海报被破坏报警。 据了解,两名男子也因涉嫌破坏竞选海报,在今日被控上庭。 根据《国会选举条例》,任何人损毁或移除竞选海报,都可面对最高监禁一年、罚款1千元或两者兼施的刑罚。他们将在明年1月,再次出庭认罪。 48岁的男子Lim Song Huat,被控在7月3日,在兀兰13街损毁三张人民行动党的竞选海报。另一人则是51岁的Constantine Paul,涉嫌在6月30日,从武吉巴督东5道的路灯,扯下两张前进党海报。

唐振辉伦敦“审问”脸书高层 质疑脸书监管平台内容不力

我国律政部兼卫生部高级政务部长唐振辉,出席于伦敦举行的国际假新闻及假消息委员会听证大会。会上他对脸书表达质疑,是否能相信脸书对于平台上出现的仇恨、争议性内容,能作出正确的评估和判断。 他在会上质问脸书公司政策解决方案副总监查德-艾伦,脸书是否禁止用户在网络上攻击他人、宗教、种族和散播仇恨情绪,如有发现,脸书是否会及时移除? 他举例,在今年三月斯里兰卡出现的一则脸书贴文引起争议,帖文称要”杀死所有穆斯林,连婴儿也不放过“。唐振辉说,这已是很明显的仇恨贴文。 有关贴文最终引起斯里兰卡陷入佛教徒和穆斯林爆发冲突、清真寺被攻击,致使政府被迫宣布戒严。连该国时任通讯部长费南多也曾质问,为何脸书拒绝拿下该贴文。 艾伦尝试解释,该贴文理应当时就被移除,不过唐振辉则追问,当时用户在投诉后还有收到反馈,所以脸书是确实收到投诉的,而且还回应有关贴文”未违反脸书社群守则“。 艾伦:”这绝对是失误,确实有人做错了…“ 唐振辉:”艾伦先生,我想这是很严重的失误,你承认吗?“ 艾伦:”是的,我承认。“ 唐振辉:”这违反了脸书会马上移除(仇恨贴文)的政策,这是否显示我们不能相信脸书,对于平台上的内容,有能力作出正确的评估判断?“ 艾伦:”不…. 我们出现失误“唐振辉:”是严重的失误“,艾伦:对,严重的失误,但我们必须减少这些失误,我们投资在人工智能,拓展仇恨字眼词典,以侦测平台上发文者和留言者发布的仇恨内容。” 唐振辉:是否等政府封锁脸书?…

Humanitarian doctor and Singapore exile, Dr Ang Swee Chai wins Mulan’s Award

By Tan Wah Piow Once again, the charitable work of Dr Ang…

Anti-immigration protest marks 2nd year anniversary of Population White Paper protest

Organisers of the Protest against the 6.9 million population white paper held…