By Howard Lee
Fans of the X-Men series of comics will be relieved to know that the Media Development Authority (MDA) has decided not to ban “Astonishing X-Men Issue 51” from local shelves, despite the depiction of homosexual content, as the authority deemed that it contained a “balanced treatment of the issue”.
The cover of the issue featured an image of gay partner superheroes Northstar and Kyle Jinadu getting married, which was similar to another comic, “Archie: The Married Life Volume Three”, which featured the marriage of two openly gay characters in the series.
MDA has indicated that it had assessed “Issue 51” in 2012 following public feedback and queries from its importer.
Clarifying on its different position in relation to “The Married Life”, an MDA spokesman was reported by media as saying, “(Issue 51) featured characters who objected to the wedding and this offered a balanced treatment on the issue of gay marriage.”
MDA said that its content guidelines “allow for the balanced depictions of same-sex relationships if they do not encourage or promote alternative lifestyles”.
MDA also held that it takes a holistic approach to reviewing published materials that have been identified as contravening guidelines, including factors such as “context, presentation and language”.
“The Married Life” was removed from book store chain Kinokuniya in March, following a decision by MDA on its appropriateness.
The National Library Board (NLB), which was criticised earlier for its intention to destroy two children books that depicted “non-pro-family” content, is currently “reviewing the book in light of MDA’s decision” to ban “The Married Life”.
NLB also indicated earlier that the Archie series was acquired for its adult collection, to which it has a “broader approach” on permissible content compared to its children’s collection.
NLB has not indicated if it holds copies of “Issue 51” or in which section it might be holding them.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

COE Bidding Results for 1st open bidding of February 2014

After the latest open bidding exercise for the Certificate of Entitlement on…

Dr Lee Bee Wah offers minimal clarification over claim that she refused to hear out resident over 377A

On Monday, a Mr Edward Foo shared on Facebook the encounter he…

New appointments and change of Permanent Secretaries

The Public Service Division (PSD) announces two new staff appointments into the…

对假消息政府有酌处权 亚洲互联网联盟忧侵蚀言论自由

对于我国政府有意通过《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法案》,亚洲互联网联盟(AIC)表达高度关注,同时也对于法案起草过程,公众缺乏有意义的参与和咨询机会深感失望。 亚洲互联网联盟的会员包括脸书、苹果、LINE、领英(LinkedIn)、推特、谷歌、雅虎等媒体巨头。 他们在文告中指出,支持我国政府在维护社会和谐和凝聚力、保障国家机构和政治进程完整的努力。 不过,他们对于法案起草过程中,公众缺乏有意义的参与和咨询机会表达遗憾,即便有关法案对许多利益相关者,包括媒体、科技业者、新加坡和本区域的公民社会,将带来深远影响。 ”立法不应被视为首要解决方案“ 该联盟重申,他们的立场和其他专家相同,即在应对假消息这个极度复杂的课题上,立法不应被视为优先的解决方案。 ”我们也高度关注新加坡政府获得充分酌处权,来判定消息真伪。这是迄今为止类似立法中权限最广的,过度的干预恐怕会威胁言论自由,不论对新加坡或全球各地都可能带来严重后果。“ 亚洲互联网联盟表示,愿与政府紧密配合打击错误信息,不过不愿公共辩论和思想的交流因上述法案付出代价。 至于脸书也发表声明,指出部分相关立法条文赋予新加坡政府权力,迫使公司撤下他们认定的假新闻,同时要求公司将政府的警示信息发送给用户。 根据《防止网络假信息和网络操纵法案》,部长获得很大酌处权,判断哪些消息属假消息,并可行使权力发出指示,要求发送者或有关媒体进行更正。 如果符合这些条件,有关部门的部长,可通过三大管道制止假信息传播。 一、政府可发出针对性更正指示,比如规定假信息的内容旁,贴上正确讯息或引导读者到正确讯息的链接上。有关新闻不需撤下。…