By Cheryl Marie Tay
Dear National Library Board,
Before I begin my letter proper, allow me to provide a little relevant background: I’ve noticed that open letters are quite popular these days, and so far, I’ve managed to avoid writing any myself. You see, I’m too much of a hipster to do anything “cool”, so you must know how special you are, that I would actually jump on the open letter bandwagon for you. I’m also the only hipster I personally know, which truly cements my hipster status. Furthermore, it’s my birthday today, and the first serious thing I’m writing is an open letter to you. In other words, I hope you are just as honoured as I am that I am writing this letter to you.
But on to my actual letter: I have learnt that, in addition to the first three books you removed from your shelves on the grounds of complaints that they are not “pro-family”, you have removed 22 books by Robie Harris (author of Who’s In My Family?, one of the first three banned books), several of which focus on child-friendly sex education and just so happen to feature single parents and non-heterosexual couples.
The authors of two of the banned books have responded to your removal of them – Justin Richardson, who wrote that gay penguin book, also known as And Tango Makes Three, has dared to question our great government. Jeanie Okimoto, who co-authored The White Swan Express, has boldly disputed the infallible concept of family as purely heterosexual, a stance advocated by the complainant, Teo Kai Loon.
Clearly, these professional writers are woefully misguided and misinformed. Alarmingly, they have their supporters, many of whom swarmed your hallowed atrium on the holy Sabbath day for some anarchist “reading event” to protest your decision to have those books removed and pulped.
Fortunately, Teo Kai Loon has his supporters, too, as evidenced by this Facebook page. And I must say, NLB, I truly admire your firm stance in the face of such fierce opposition from these literary contrarians. Despite being deeply disheartened by these warriors of Satan, you have stood your ground. So, in an expression of my undying love for you and unwavering support of your worthy cause, I have decided to aid you in your mission to rid your shelves of demonic, anti-family books. The following is a list of titles you should ban and pulp to cleanse your stock of all that is unholy:
1. Aesop’s Fables
This is technically not a book, but a collection of many stories which have been poisoning children for generations. How are they not pro-family? Take for instance a story like The Man With Two Mistresses. From its title alone, you can tell this book is not pro-family. Other Aesop’s fables have suggestive titles such as The Ass and His Masters (most likely about the unholy practice of BDSM), The Beaver, and The Cock and the Jewel (the last two clearly euphemisms for female and male genitalia). Tsk tsk tsk. I suggest all books containing these stories be removed and pulped, just to be safe.
2.  Grimms’ Fairy Tales
Like Aesop’s Fables, this is a dangerous collection of stories venomous to young minds. Let me give you a few examples

  • Hansel and Gretel: The children’s abusive stepmother, afraid she and her husband will starve during the famine because the kids “eat too much”, hatches a plan to abandon them in the woods. Worse, their own father eventually agrees to go along with this wicked plan! And they later encounter a witch (obviously an agent of the Devil himself) whose candy house entices them (gluttony), and they very nearly get eaten. Surely, this is not pro-family.
  • Cinderella: In the famous version of the story as we know it, Cinderella’s stepmother and stepsisters mistreat her daily for many years. Then, one fine day, her fairy godmother appears and magically transforms her rags to finery so she can attend the prince’s ball. She loses her shoe at the ball as she is leaving, and prince does not even know her name. Still, he finds her the next day, after which they marry and live happily ever after. Abuse, magic, and marrying someone you barely know? Blasphemy! Ban and pulp (BAP)!
  • Sleeping Beauty: A king and queen have a daughter, who is cursed to die on her 16th birthday by a spiteful sorceress. A good fairy alters the curse, and when it is fulfilled, she arrives in a chariot of fire drawn by dragons. Dragons! How can we accept such servants of Lucifer being trumpeted as heroes aiding the good guy in her mission? Also, the “good guy” is a fairy, which means she practises magic, and is therefore evil. Worse, the princess is later awoken by a kiss from a prince, who is a complete stranger to her. This is clearly sexual harassment, and behaviour in which only harlots engage.
  • Snow White: Snow White’s jealous stepmother sends a huntsman to kill her so she will finally be fairest in the land (though there is no guarantee this will happen upon her death), but he spares her. She takes refuge in a house shared by seven dwarves, who agree to let her stay after she promises to do all their housework. Her stepmother soon discovers she has been deceived, and tries three times to kill her herself, finally succeeding with the help of a poisoned apple. Laid to rest by the dwarves in a glass coffin, she is discovered by a prince who, like in Sleeping Beauty, awoke her with a kiss. This story is the worst so far: envy, vanity, murder, co-habiting with seven strange men, and being kissed by another strange man? Torch it, I say!
  • Rumpelstiltskin: A miller lies to his king that his daughter can spin straw into gold, leading to the king having her locked in a tower to prove this, or face a beheading. An imp, Rumpelstiltskin, magically appears and does the job for her, saving her life. He does this twice more when the king gives her more straw to spin into gold, and, after having paid the imp with her ring, she has nothing left to give him. He makes her promise him her firstborn child, and returns to collect his payment when she has married the king and had her first child. She tries to avoid keeping her promise, and he compromises by saying she can keep her child if she can guess his name within three days. She does, and in a rage, he drives one foot so far into the ground that he gets stuck. The story ends with him grabbing his other foot and tearing himself in two. Avarice, violence, and promising to give up one’s own flesh and blood to some demonic magical creature? Sacrilege! BAP!

3. The Bible
Actually, all religious texts. I could pick out all the (predominantly Old Testament) verses that mention incestslavery,patricideinfanticidefratricideregicidehomicidesuicidesexism, misogynyracismxenophobiaconcubines,adultery, and so on and so forth. And while some may argue that such horrors are mentioned in the Bible to show us what is wrong and let us form our own opinions, others may feel the Bible actually condones such behaviour.
But I think this letter is already long enough, and I wouldn’t want to take up any more of your precious time. I’m sure you have more important things to do, like scour your shelves for more books to BAP. But Singapore is a secular country which happens to have citizens of many races, religions and cultures, so in order to avoid exposing any of us to “conflicting content”, I think the best approach would be to BAP all religious books. It’s simple and requires hardly any thought – perfect for your busy schedule!
I do hope you consider my suggestions. I am a concerned member of the public dedicated to seeing family values constantly promoted in our country, and am well aware that the subversive, Satan-worshiping LGBT community seeks to rip apart our social fabric, starting with the most impressionable components of society: our children.
So, please – spare a thought for the children! They are our future, and God-approved censorship is the path to their success.
Yours Faithfully,
A Pro-Family Singaporean

This letter was first published at http://yoursirreverently.wordpress.com

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SCDF officers helped a mother in an on-the-spot delivery of her baby boy at the couple's home

Three paramedic officers, Prm Kitshan (officer in-charge), Medic Shafiq Rhymia and Medic Samo Iqbal,…

新加坡能复制大马变天?(2) 柔净选盟 国阵堡垒区办集会

2012年,隔着新柔长堤的柔佛仍牢牢掌控在国阵手中,即便在2008年全国大选,柔佛州国阵只丢失了一个选区巴克里,人民海啸也未冲倒这座老树盘根国阵堡垒。但即便如此,柔佛州公民组织干净选举联盟,毅然在首府新山举办净选盟3.0集会,就是希望能撼动霸权的主干,激发柔佛人民的政治醒觉。 柔佛非政府组织愿景工程(ENGAGE)主席范平东,也是该州南部净选盟副主席,在18日举行的“新加坡能否复制大马变天”时事论坛,分享柔佛公民组织的经验。 他说,当时受到净选盟主席安美嘉邀请,动员柔佛支持者出席在首都吉隆坡举行的集会。“可是在开会时,有同志就提到,为何不在柔佛同步办一场集会?因为巫统的发源地就在柔佛,马华的堡垒区也在这里。” 撼动国阵“主干” “与其拨动其他的树枝,倒不如直接撼动国阵的主干,这是我们当时的想法。于是就叫上志同道合者,动员了50人协助印传单、做宣传等。” 范平东说,当时根本就不知道什么是记者会,但还是办了,请来媒体柔宣传柔佛新山场的净选盟集会。他坦言,主流媒体并不搭理,只有中文媒体还给了中肯的报导。 https://youtu.be/80efIClIB2Q 他说,当地民众为了宣扬民主理念,参与者都是自费,好像推销员般到各个超级市场,协助民主登记成为选民,因为只要增加选民人数,才有可能在选票上削弱国阵势力。 由于资源都掌握在州国阵手上,可以预见警察、市议会都拒绝颁发集会准证,理由是当天有军警球赛和摇滚演唱会。 范平东说,原本预计只有数百人出席,当天净选盟支持者当天还是成功举办了和平集会,出席者超过八千人。范平东说,主办当局是基于宪法第十条,保障人民和平集会权力。他说,集会者在操场500米外集合。还得有不同的对策,应付被警方驱赶、干涉等可能情况。 “在活动前自愿者们都是挨家逐户派集会传单,从我们接触的普通群众,我们能感受到民心思变,是因为人民的支持,柔佛的社运才能支撑下去。” 他认为,马来西亚的变天,背后是经历了20年不间断的民间运动,多少人愿意付出代价,甚至有人被拘留、面临破产等。…

提升就业入息补贴,真的不在再纳的权限范围?

前日,主管低薪工人事务的职总助理秘书长再纳,出席《海峡时报》举行的圆桌对话会,探讨在破坏式经济时代下,国内劳动阶级的薪资模式。 受邀出席的尚有巡回大使许通美教授、淡马锡控股主席林文兴、新加坡中小企业协会会长王崇健以及清洁公司Nimbus创办人之一汤信豪。 许通美在对话会上,捍卫最低薪资制,他指出目前政府推出的就业入息补贴(WIS)和渐进式薪资模式(PW)立意虽善,但是还不够完善,他们的补贴或给付并不多,仍不足以让劳工摆脱贫穷。 所以,他提出,如果政府把渐进式薪资模式作为落实最低薪资制的先行计划,有计划逐步落实在所有领域;或者政府愿意提升WIS的补贴给付,让劳工减轻负担,才能达到效果。 目前,渐进式薪资模式进落实在保安、园艺、清洁工和电梯维修领域,保障这四大领域劳工的基本薪资,未来薪资透过参与培训、绩效表现增长。 但吊诡的是,身为职总副秘书长、理应和劳工站在一起的再纳,对于许通美的建议,说了令人困惑的话:“这不在我的职权范围,教授。”(not within my pay grade, Prof.) 这句话的潜台词似乎是:“这是我老板考虑的事,我操哪门子心呢?”…

Yeo “prepared for Aljunied loss”, but kept it from teammates

30 minutes into the vote counting process for Aljunied GRC at the…