By Gangasudhan
In the wake of the National Library Board removing and destroying the children’s book “The White Swan Express” from its shelves, TOC got in touch with one of the authors, Jeanie Davies Okimoto and asked her for her views about the incident. We thank Ms Okimoto for taking the time to reply to us.

I was very sad to learn that the NLB in Singapore had censored the book that I wrote with my co-author Elaine Aoki. I have been following the comments on the internet and there have been some wonderful thoughtful articles supporting the book. On a blog, sgpolitics.net, Ng-E-Jay wrote a splendid description of what role literature should play in society. I also should mention that all the major respected reviewers in the US (School Library Journal, Booklist, Kirkus) gave the book glowing reviews and the book is in libraries all over the US and Canada as well as Australia, and New Zealand.
It is my understanding that in Singapore the book was censored from the library because of the complaint of one person Teo Kai Loon who belongs to a group that is trying to destroy rights of gay people. And based on his ideas of what books are suitable for children, the chief librarian Tay Ai Cheng complied and said that the NLB “took a strong pro-family stand in selecting books for children.”
As the author, I also took a strong pro-family stand in that we showed four loving families who all adopted babies from an orphanage in China. I wonder if Teo Kai Loon and the librarian Tay Ai Cheng think there is enough love in the world, so we don’t need to honor it in families that don’t meet their idea of what a family should be?
Our book is about adopting children and providing loving homes. And the diversity of the families reflected my values of inclusiveness and respect for differences. I always wonder in these situations why people who don’t think a book is suitable for children could just not have their children read it? Why should their ideas dictate what is right for everybody else?
Beyond the question of what constitutes a family, there is the issue of process when it comes to censorship. Is there a process within the Singapore library system to handle the situation when a book is challenged by one person? Many countries have a process because challenging books is a common occurrence usually by a small group of people who want their ideas of morality to dictate what should be read by everyone.
The title of the book comes from the White Swan Hotel, the actual hotel in Guangzhou where the adopted families stay when they first arrive in China to meet their daughters for the first time. I had to laugh at one of the articles by a Singapore writer who said the book “depicts the challenges of families who adopt swans.” I enjoyed this writer who obviously hadn’t read the book–censorship is very sad, but learning that she thought the book was about adopting swans lightened things a bit for me.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Two men arrested after fight breaks out near A&W outlet at Jewel Changi Airport

Two men were arrested by the police for being involved in a…

Rampant job ads looking for “skilled” foreign workers paying below minimum EP/SP salary

A TOC article (‘F&B group founded by award winning entrepreneur, caught for…

Singapore’s People Party: Independent inquiry needed for rail system failures

Singapore’s People Party (SPP) has published a statement on both its Facebook…

包装纸巾都要“减料”? 职总平价促民提供样本

包装上注明内含10张纸巾,但是细数后只有七张,遭网民讽刺职总平价(Fairprice)应该是“不平价”(Unfairprice)。对此,职总平价呼吁上传有关视频的网民提供产品样本,以便协助调查,而目前超市存货内并没有任何异常。 据了解,名为Raven Qiu的网民,日前在脸书专页Complaint Singapore上载约两分钟30秒的视频,视频展示一大包的职总平价Soft包装纸巾,从中抽出一包来做示范。 他展示了包装上的资料,包括厂商、地址、品牌和包装内容后,就取出纸巾,一一点算并放置在桌上,发现只有七张纸巾,并非如包装所述的10张数。 有关的视频传出后,已经有3万4490人看过,454人有反应,195个评论以及293人转发。大部分网民都表示难以置信,但是也有的网民表示曾经开过拥有13张纸巾的包装,也有人认为这个实属正常,毕竟人有错手。 职总平价获悉有关事件后,在回复公民记者网站《Stomp》的询问时表示,他们非常重视有关事件,并且指产品的完整性至关重要。 惟,他们表示未接获有关的反馈,因此希望能够和制作视频的网民取得联系,提供产品样本,让他们能够履行责任展开调查。 职总平价也呼吁人民停止传播煽动性言论或未经证实的消息,避免造成不必要的恐慌。他们也强调对其产品有不满的人士,可以随时要求退款或退换,更欢迎有疑问的民众直接联络他们的客服热线(电话:65522722)询问。