By Terry Xu
In a follow up to a story written in September last year, The Online Citizen (TOC) waited outside two hotels after receiving information from sources to look out for more cases of Malaysia coaches fouling the local laws.
Inclusive of the earlier two cases which we have filmed and reported, there are a total of 8 cases of Malaysian buses picking up tourists outside of scheduled pick up points.
Under Singapore law, foreign coaches cannot pick up tourists from pick up points other than those on scheduled services. According to Land Transport Authority (LTA) regulations, tour buses “shall only be used to carry tourists from an ASEAN member country to visit Singapore or vice versa.” (See here)
Scheduled bus services means those operating from designated locations that are approved by LTA through application. (LTA application form)
But local coach drivers complain that Malaysian coaches have been driving in to Singapore with no passengers to pick up.
According to Mr Lim (not his real name), a Singaporean coach driver whom TOC spoke to, these occurrences have been happening the past few years. Local tour companies engage Malaysian coaches to ferry their customers on tour packages that covers Singapore and Kuala Lumpur because it is cheaper to do so.
The Singapore coaches which ferry tourists from Singapore to Malaysia have to pay for licenses in Malaysia, in addition to a costly insurance package for their entry into Malaysia. And because of these expenses, the increasing number of Malaysian buses illegally ferrying tourists into Malaysia is affecting their income and thus their livelihood.
Earlier in August last year, MP for Aljunied GRC, Mr Muhamad Faisal Bin Abdul Manap, asked the Minister for Transport, Mr Lui Tuck Yew whether such cases of errant Malaysian bus drivers have been increasing.
Mr Lui replied:

“There has been only one case of a Malaysia-registered bus caught entering Singapore to ferry tourists to Malaysia in 2013, and none in the prior two years.” (Hansard report)

However, working on tip-offs, TOC witnessed 6 such cases when we paid a visit to Victoria Street, Rangoon Road and Jalan Basar on 16th, 20th September and 12th, 14th, 15th, 18th October. We were not able to film the other two cases on 16th September and 18th October as it was at another location during the same timing.
[youtube id=”103FU7IfrkE” align=”center”] The LTA was informed of the first incident, while the second was not as the coach driver was not sure of the exact timing of the pick up. The coach driver was surprised to see LTA sending its enforcement officer down as this was the first time LTA turned up.
The LTA officer stopped the coach and informed the driver that he had to drop his passengers at the hotel lobby and have another Singaporean bus ferry them to customs. However, the coach was eventually able to leave for Malaysia with its passengers.
LTA was also present during the incident on 18th October, stopping the coach before it departed. But after they have completed the checks, LTA said that the ferrying of the passengers is legal as the passengers had originated from Thailand.
Mr Lim said that if LTA was serious about clamping down on these illegal behavior, they would deploy LTA enforcement officers at the checkpoints to check the Malaysian coaches coming in and out of Singapore Customs. This would ensure that buses that come into Singapore without any passengers have good reasons for doing so.
Other coach drivers told TOC that they themselves have seen such acts very often but are unable to take videos or photos of these to present to LTA as evidence because of the restriction on photography at the customs checkpoints.
Mr Lim had been trying to get an answer from LTA about the ASEAN agreement on how it benefits coach drivers like him. After six months of gruelling back and forth, Mr Lim is still left with no answers.
Given the high number of incidents, TOC wrote to LTA for clarification on this matter. In response to TOC’s question of how many of such cases were caught by LTA:

“A Malaysia-registered tourist bus will need an ASEAN Public Service Vehicle (PSV) Permit to enter Singapore. The tourist bus is not allowed to pick up passengers from Singapore, unless these passengers commenced their journey in an ASEAN member country, other than Singapore.
Since 2013, we caught a Malaysia-registered tourist bus picking up passengers from Singapore. If convicted, the bus owner will be liable for a fine not exceeding S$2,000 or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months under the Road Traffic Act and a revocation of the ASEAN PSV Permit.”

After we replied that we have caught more than one of such cases in Singapore on film, there has been no reply from the spokesperson from LTA, Bus & Vocational Licensing department for two weeks.
We also asked if even LTA has difficulty in identifying which Malaysian coaches is fouling the law, what about ordinary citizens who wish to do their due duty as law abiding citizens? It too has not answered this question.
Indeed, as revealed by the Singaporean coach whom we spoke to, LTA has always been informed of such cases, but they either do not act upon it or request the informant to supply the bus identification number to them before they take any action.
For now, some of the Singaporean coach drivers have choose to drop their Malaysian bus permit as it is no longer economical to hold pay for the permit and the insurance required to enter Malaysia due to dwindling orders to ferry passengers to Malaysia. Eventually as this trend continues to grow, tour companies can legitimately say that there are simply no local coach drivers who can ferry the tourists and ask to allow Malaysian coaches to be used. Incidentally, this trend is not limited to the coach driver profession.
Given that there are 8 documented cases within a short span of one month, is there an issue that LTA should be aware of and to do something about it, given that it concerns the livelihood of honest citizens working as coach drivers?
Is it not questionable that the Transport Minister and the LTA could say that there “has been only one case of a Malaysia-registered bus caught entering Singapore to ferry tourists to Malaysia in 2013, and none in the prior two years”?

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

余振忠促政府一视同仁 非选区议员也能享有助理津贴

政府昨日宣布反对党领袖的职责和福利。这也包括额外津贴能最多聘请三名国会助理( Legislative Assistants)。 工人党前非选区议员余振忠,也表示希望政府同样能恢复非选区议员和官委议员的聘请国会助理津贴,毕竟在履行职责上,政府不该厚此薄彼。 然而,非选区议员和官委议员没有聘请国会助理的津贴,因此在他担任议员期间,并无法聘请任何国会助理。 而本届选举,受委非选区议员的就包括两位前进党成员潘群勤和梁文辉。至于余振忠在此次选举曾代表工人党在马林百列集选区上阵,硬撼行动党陈川仁团队。 余振忠在脸书上发帖指出,过去时任第一副总理吴作栋,在1989年宣布,国会议员将获得津贴,以便聘请国会助理来支援议员工作。在1997年,官委议员和非选区议员的津贴突然被取消,当时已故惹耶勒南(JBJ)是非选区议员,和黄根成就曾为撤销津贴一事进行交流。 他指出,国会议员目前所获得的国会助理津贴为每月1300元,但是这并不足以聘请专业的全职助理。因此有些国会议员就会合作聘请一名全职的助理,或聘请兼职助理,或国会议员自掏腰包补贴助理酬薪。 虽然如此,他知道有些官委议员,只用了他们和非选区议员一样多的津贴,即国会议员津贴的15巴仙,以聘请了各自的助理。而基于非选区议员和官委议员津贴,真正税后带回家的月入可能少于1800元,若聘请国会助理,这笔钱大部分都要交给助理了。 他也指出,在担任非选区议员时并没有提出有关课题,因为不想成为对自己有利的议论课题。 非选区议员工作也不少 实则非选区议员和官委议员工作,亦不比任何国会议员来的少,若查看国会记录就会发现,有时发言率可能还比普通议员高出许多。(可以看看上届国会积极发言的官委议员王丽婷等人)…

首次有港示威者中枪 警一哥称警员感生命受威胁“开枪合法合理”

昨日(1日)时逢中国国庆70周年,香港再次发起全城大游行,在黄大仙、屯门、沙田等多个区域可见示威者与警方以汽油弹和催泪弹交战,场面火爆,多处更着火焚烧,此外,港警在清场过程施放实弹,一名18岁少年遭击中,成为香港示威4个月以来首位被真枪实弹击中的受害者。 据悉,当时少年正在新界西的荃湾与镇暴警察发生冲突,示威者原本要包围“香港中国旅行社”的荃湾分社 ,该旅行社属于中资旅行社,但却遭到港警驱离清场,双方沿着街道巷弄近战冲突。 根据香港大学学生会的视频画面,伤者当时与警方对峙,而且接近警方,试图挥动铁棍殴打警方,而警方却近距离向他开枪,伤者中枪后倒地,胸口流血不止。当时,伤者倒地后,意识依然清醒,并对着围拢过来提供救助的目击者大喊,“送我去医院,胸口很痛”,并还能说出自己的名字曾志健,身旁的记者见状也劝伤者勿激动,胸口正在流血。 数名警察在事件发生后,为伤者提供医护协助。事后警方称,伤者年龄18岁,左肩受伤,送院的时候“神志清醒”。 而根据《香港01》记者的现场报道,当时约莫下午4点,听到一声巨响后,发现有一名示威者倒地挣扎,血液不断从衣服渗出,他表示,当时伤者仅记得自己中枪,好痛,但并不清楚中枪位置。而记者在确认情况后,向在场警员求救,救护也在伤者倒地后5分钟到场。 据现场所见,伤者左胸位置出血,救护人员在叫他时,他仍有反应,但气息逐渐减弱,在下午4点半左右,转送马甲列玛嘉烈医。 消息指,该名少年被射中肺部,幸未伤及心脏、大动脉,但有子弹弹头留在体内,要接驳人工肺呼吸,现时经手术已成功取出。 至今早(2日)医管局证实少年情况稳定,目前他仍留医深切治疗部。 港警:开枪属“合法、合理”,因感自身及同事声明受到威胁 对此,香港警方在傍晚7点左右通过视频公告,证实枪击事件。至于港警务处处长卢伟聪则在稍后凌晨召开记者会,指该名警员是在是在别无选择下开枪,属“合法、合理” ,因感自身及同事生命受到威胁。…

酒醉男子路中央大闹

有男子被发现在实龙岗路中央疑似大发酒疯,在一条车道表演天王巨星麦克杰逊的“月球漫步”(Moonwalk),其友人尝试劝导不果,还被男子大喊,随后冲向迎面而来的轿车,不禁令人为他冒冷汗。 有关视频在多个脸书群组疯传,只见一名疑似酒醉,穿着白色衣裳男子站在大路中央,而其穿着灰衣的友人也尝试趋前,想将他拉到路边,还对其他车道的车辆可以继续行驶。 男子在被友人拉走前,将友人推开,还不断往后退,企图躲开友人。他随后对着友人大喊,却又自扇巴掌,最后就向前冲,似乎想直接撞上迎面而来的轿车,引起轿车司机和附近车辆纷纷鸣笛。 友人当时立刻冲过去将他拉往路旁,并不断挥手道歉,这场闹剧才落幕。 有网民呼吁拍摄者报警,因为他们的行为已经严重影响了道路安全。