Connect with us

Economics

Trans-Pacific Partnership: The demise of our enquiry?

Published

on

By Dr Wee Teck Young
I wonder what Singaporeans will think of the international humanitarian organization Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières’ warning on the 7th of July, 2014, that ‘the Trans-Pacific Partnership will further erode access to life saving medicines in all countries involved in the deal, hitting poor and vulnerable people the hardest’.
Do we presume that governments and corporations are wise in negotiating this trade agreement, and that these humanitarian doctors don’t have the larger national or international interests in mind when they express concern for the least empowered among us?
Similarly, has today’s uncritical belief in governments rather than in their citizens led to peace activists being seen as troublemakers, or ignorant idealists, and to governments being seen as having good and just reasons for waging wars?
Not many Singaporeans know about the ‘closed-door’ negotiations being conducted by the Singaporean government and the governments of Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Vietnam and the leader of this pack, the United States.
new_zealanders_protest_the_TPP
 
New Zealanders protest against the TPP
Japanese_cattle_farmers_protest_the_TPP
Japanese cattle farmers protest against the TPP
This deal is now being crafted without public scrutiny or discourse, in Ottawa, Canada.
I’m concerned about the lack of democratic accountability and transparency in negotiating this Partnership.  And I wonder, if Singaporeans were a little more informed about these rather ‘secret’ talks, would the potential effect of the TPP on poor and vulnerable Singaporeans and others cause us to at least ask for more information?
If we asked further questions, or asked for a more open discussion about the Trans-Pacific Partnership like The Straits Times once did, we may be greeted with silence or less palatably, with a government attitude that seems to have irked many Singaporean voters, “Just take it from us, the Trans-Pacific Partnership will be good for trade and therefore good for our GDP. We know. The physicians of Doctors without Borders don’t know enough.”
I think that even if it turns out after some years that the Trans-Pacific Partnership has benefited all, including the ‘poor and vulnerable’, we should at least have examined its pros and con and show curiosity.
We should at least have been curious about whether Doctors without Borders was making an unthinking analysis, or whether they, as doctors reputed to risk their lives in helping others, had insidious intentions in opposing this trade agreement.
We should at least enquire, “Who will benefit from the Trans-Pacific Partnership?”


 
hakimDr Wee Teck Young ( Dr Hakim ) is a medical doctor from Singapore who has done humanitarian and social enterprise work in Afghanistan for the past 9 years, including being a friend and mentor to the Afghan Peace Volunteers, an inter-ethnic group of young Afghans dedicated to building non-violent alternatives to war. He is the 2012 recipient of the International Pfeffer Peace Prize.

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

AFP

Top rice supplier India bans some exports

India, the world’s largest rice exporter, bans non-basmati white rice exports to ensure domestic availability and tackle rising prices amid global food crises, potentially impacting rice-dependent nations.

Published

on

MUMBAI, INDIA —  The world’s biggest rice exporter India has banned some overseas sales of the grain “with immediate effect”, the government said, in a move that could drive international prices even higher.

Rice is a major world food staple and prices on international markets have soared to decade highs as the world grappled with the Covid pandemic, the war in Ukraine and the impact of the El Nino weather phenomenon on production levels.

India would ban exports of non-basmati white rice — which accounts for around a quarter of its total — the consumer affairs and food ministry said.

The move would “ensure adequate availability” and “allay the rise in prices in the domestic market”, it said in a statement late Thursday.

India accounts for more than 40 percent of all global rice shipments, so the decision could “risk exacerbating food insecurity in countries highly dependent on rice imports”, data analytics firm Gro Intelligence said in a note.

Countries expected to be hit by the ban include African nations, Turkey, Syria, and Pakistan — all of them already struggling with high food-price inflation — the firm added.

Global demand saw Indian exports of non-basmati white rice jump 35 percent year-on-year in the second quarter, the ministry said.

The increase came even after the government banned broken rice shipments and imposed a 20 percent export tax on white rice in September.

India exported 10.3 million tonnes of non-basmati white rice last year and Rabobank senior analyst Oscar Tjakra said alternative suppliers did not have spare capacity to fill the gap.

“Typically the major exporters are Thailand, Vietnam, and to some extent Pakistan and the US,” he told AFP. “They won’t have enough supply of rice to replace these.”

Moscow’s cancellation of the Black Sea grain deal that protected Ukrainian exports has already led to wheat prices creeping up, he pointed out.

“Obviously this will add to inflation around the world because rice can be used as a substitute for wheat.”

Rice prices in India rose 14-15 per cent in the year to March and the government “clearly viewed these as red lines from a domestic food security and inflation point of view”, rating agency Crisil’s research director Pushan Sharma said in a note.

India had already curbed exports of wheat and sugar last year to rein in prices.

— AFP

Continue Reading

AFP

Chinese mortgage strikers despair as unfinished homes stay stalled

Chinese homebuyers are resorting to mortgage boycotts and protests against developers due to ongoing housing crisis, with little legal recourse and government sensitivity to the issue.

Published

on

ZHENGZHOU, CHINA — Gao Zhuang says he has refused to pay his mortgage for months, a desperate protest against the Chinese property developer he blames for endless delays on the unfinished apartment he bought years ago for his son.

He is one of many victims of a long-running housing crisis still wreaking misery on the lives of homebuyers, many of whom have little legal recourse on what has become an ultra-sensitive subject for the government.

The 49-year-old labourer from central Henan bought an apartment in the provincial capital Zhengzhou for 1.2 million yuan (US$170,000) in 2019, and said he was told it would be completed in two years.

He staked much of his savings on the flat, hoping it would improve his son’s marriage prospects and allow his family to start leaving their poorer rural hometown behind.

But the developer announced delay after delay, and construction work ground to a virtual halt late last year.

“The main impact has been on my son,” said Gao, who requested his name be changed to avoid repercussions.

“How can he get married without his own place?”

Gao’s case is not uncommon.

A wave of mortgage boycotts spread nationwide last summer, as cash-strapped developers struggled to raise enough to complete homes they had already sold in advance — a common practice in China.

Endemic issues in the real estate sector had been brought to a head in 2020, when the government cracked down on excessive borrowing and rampant speculation.

Cut off from the easy money that had fuelled the boom of the last few decades, many companies began floundering under accumulated debts.

A slowing economy was hammered further by pandemic-era health curbs, adding to low consumer confidence and a slump in housing demand.

Beijing recently introduced a raft of measures intended to remedy the disarray in the sector.

Although some properties have since been completed, many buyers like Gao are still waiting — while other issues have surfaced, from slapdash building work to disputes over compensation and pressure from local officials.

‘I blame the government’

The property crisis grabbed headlines for its scale, notably entangling industry giant Evergrande, which flirted with bankruptcy before announcing a massive restructuring deal.

The smaller regional firm building Gao’s complex, Henan Jin’en Real Estate, is not publicly listed, making its financial situation hard to discern.

It did not reply to AFP’s requests for comment.

Disgruntled homeowners say the compound’s estimated 100 undelivered homes and shoddy finishes are evidence the company is struggling.

AFP journalists visiting in June observed crumbling exterior masonry, holes in interior walls, loose wiring and unsecured fire doors.

A handful of workers dug trenches and stacked cinder blocks on the site’s periphery, while the sound of drilling emanated from several homes.

Some buyers said the developer had hired a skeleton staff of labourers to justify a rumoured government bailout.

One owner said local officials seemed powerless to ensure the project’s completion, adding that “ordinary people have suffered the worst”.

“I don’t blame the developer — I blame the government,” the middle-aged man told AFP, gazing around the concrete shell of an apartment.

“Some people around here still believe in our government, but I think they’re the least worthy of our faith.”

‘Nothing I can do’

Gao told AFP he stopped paying his 5,000-yuan (US$700) monthly mortgage in January, joining a boycott with others from the complex.

He said his attempts to claim compensation for the delays from the developer had been unsuccessful.

“Their attitude has been, ‘If you don’t like it, sue us,'” Gao said.

“But they know that in China, people like us are rarely able to afford a lawsuit.”

For others, initial fury has given way to helplessness.

“There’s no point getting angry because there’s nothing I can do,” said 24-year-old homebuyer Wang, using a pseudonym.

The online store operator purchased a home in the wealthy eastern city of Ningbo for 690,000 yuan in 2021, but work stopped later that year.

When AFP visited the site, empty towerblock facades surrounded mounds of overturned earth and piping, with rusty vehicles parked chaotically among the rubble.

Around a dozen workers mooched among stone slabs and upturned trees waiting to be planted, roots drying out in the summer sun.

Wang said he had “no confidence” in the latest promise the property would be finished by August’s end.

“After this, I’ll never buy a house that isn’t finished already,” he said.

“And I won’t believe all the rhetoric the government and others come out with.”

Don’t speak out

China’s leadership has recently cut mortgage rates, slashed red tape and offered developers more loans in a bid to shore up the industry.

But analysts warn President Xi Jinping’s government has limited room for manoeuvre and could face further threats as debt distress spreads to state-owned developers and larger cities.

The prognosis for the sector, according to a June note from Japanese bank Nomura, “appears dire”.

For Beijing, the issue threatens one of its highest priorities — social stability.

Authorities in multiple regions have moved to stifle public complaints about unfinished homes in recent months, according to mortgage boycott participants contacted by AFP.

Both Gao and Wang said they had been contacted by local officials to dissuade them from petitioning the government or speaking to the media.

Multiple other buyers said they had received calls from the police, who they feared were also monitoring their private social media groups.

“There’s nothing I can say about this,” one initially receptive group administrator told AFP before abruptly breaking off contact.

“The state is controlling this too strictly right now.”

— AFP

Continue Reading

Trending