yi

The following is a Facebook post by the Minister of Communications and Information, Yaacob Ibrahim, on the controversy surrounding the National Library’s removal of two children’s books from its shelves.

I refer to NLB’s statement, “NLB Takes a Cautious Approach in Selecting Books for Children”.

https://www.facebook.com/nlbsg/posts/10152225024695924

The withdrawal of the three children’s titles from our public libraries has sparked much discussion online and in the media. Those who object to NLB’s decision and those who support it are equally vocal and energetic in their views.

This is not the first, nor will it be the last time that public institutions like NLB find themselves facing such a controversy. I wish to explain the Government’s approach, in the hope that this will help all sides understand what the withdrawal is about – and what it is not about.

Firstly, the withdrawal was not based on a single complaint, without an attempt to assess the merits of the complaint. NLB has a process where its officers carefully consider such feedback, before making a decision.

Secondly, this is a decision only with respect to the children’s section in the public libraries. NLB is not deciding what books children can or cannot read. That decision remains with the parents, as it always has been. People can buy these titles for their children if they wish. Rather, NLB has to decide what books should be made readily available to children, who are sometimes unsupervised, in the children’s section of our public libraries. For the adult sections of the library, the guidelines for what is suitable are much wider, and a much wider range of titles are on the shelves.

Thirdly, NLB’s decision was guided by community norms. Public libraries serve the community and it is right that they give consideration to community norms. The prevailing norms, which the overwhelming majority of Singaporeans accept, support teaching children about conventional families, but not about alternative, non-traditional families, which is what the books in question are about. This approach is shared between all public agencies dealing with the education and care of young Singaporeans.

Like in other societies, there is considerable effort by some in Singapore to shift these norms, and equally strong pushback by those who don’t wish to see change. Societies are never static, and will change over time. But NLB’s approach is to reflect existing social norms, and not to challenge or seek to change them.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

What next for the PAP?

Excerpts from Siew Kum Hong’s blog: What. A. Night. The Workers’ Party…

ST report "sensational": NLB

The National Library Board (NLB) has withdrawn only three books “as a…

Temasek freeze salaries and promotion hikes for one year starting April for fund-raising

Temasek, the national investment firm, plans to freeze promotion and salaries increments…

【选举】民主党倡议援助失业者方案 应对后冠病时代危机

新加坡民主党指出,在该党的“重新启动RESTART”援助和重新雇佣计划下,被裁员的员工将获得临时援助金,让他们创业,扭转我国的经济结构,强化国家企业家文化。 民主党秘书长徐顺全在脸书帖文,指出该党所推出的“重启”计划,能够协助被裁退的国人,让他们能够透过该援助金重新振作,甚至创业。 他表示,该党非常关注我国的就业机会和失业率课题,并对目前的政策感到失望。 他指出,透过“重启”计划,被裁国人能够持续18个月获得原薪金的一半援助金,即即首半年提供原先工资的75巴仙,第二半年提供一半的工资,以及最后的半年提供原工资的四分一。 “若被裁员工能够找到另外九名面对同样命运的国人,他们可以透过提交可行的商业计划书,一次性领出所有援助金,作为合作企业的资本。” 该计划也会就合作企业的类型制定广泛的指南,并设立独立机构进行监督,以防遭滥用,更可以引用法定指南,让董事会和管理层承担责任。 他指出,此做法已经在意大利率先被提出,被称为马可拉法(Marcora Law),帮助被裁退的人们重新振作,并鼓励国人创业。类似的合作企业为会员所拥有和管理,将有助于新加坡市场的经济包容性和多元化。 徐顺全指出,我国在“裙带资本主义”指数中,排位偏高,是不健康且不可持续的现象。因此他希望自冠状病毒19疫情后的复苏时期,我国能够摆脱政府主导的国内经济,真正调整我国的经济结构,让私营部门取到关键作用,加强国家的企业家文化。