yi

The following is a Facebook post by the Minister of Communications and Information, Yaacob Ibrahim, on the controversy surrounding the National Library’s removal of two children’s books from its shelves.

I refer to NLB’s statement, “NLB Takes a Cautious Approach in Selecting Books for Children”.

https://www.facebook.com/nlbsg/posts/10152225024695924

The withdrawal of the three children’s titles from our public libraries has sparked much discussion online and in the media. Those who object to NLB’s decision and those who support it are equally vocal and energetic in their views.

This is not the first, nor will it be the last time that public institutions like NLB find themselves facing such a controversy. I wish to explain the Government’s approach, in the hope that this will help all sides understand what the withdrawal is about – and what it is not about.

Firstly, the withdrawal was not based on a single complaint, without an attempt to assess the merits of the complaint. NLB has a process where its officers carefully consider such feedback, before making a decision.

Secondly, this is a decision only with respect to the children’s section in the public libraries. NLB is not deciding what books children can or cannot read. That decision remains with the parents, as it always has been. People can buy these titles for their children if they wish. Rather, NLB has to decide what books should be made readily available to children, who are sometimes unsupervised, in the children’s section of our public libraries. For the adult sections of the library, the guidelines for what is suitable are much wider, and a much wider range of titles are on the shelves.

Thirdly, NLB’s decision was guided by community norms. Public libraries serve the community and it is right that they give consideration to community norms. The prevailing norms, which the overwhelming majority of Singaporeans accept, support teaching children about conventional families, but not about alternative, non-traditional families, which is what the books in question are about. This approach is shared between all public agencies dealing with the education and care of young Singaporeans.

Like in other societies, there is considerable effort by some in Singapore to shift these norms, and equally strong pushback by those who don’t wish to see change. Societies are never static, and will change over time. But NLB’s approach is to reflect existing social norms, and not to challenge or seek to change them.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SPF introduces new police warrant card

From 1 March 2016 onwards, police officers from the Singapore Police Force…

SAF and former rigger address claims of PRC parachute rigging contractor

On Tuesday (12 January) evening, Ministry of Defence clarifies on the viral…

【武汉冠状病毒】23例!本地单日确诊创新高

根据新加坡卫生部文告,截至3月17日中午12时(17日),本地新增23起武汉冠状病毒(COVID-19)确诊病例,创下单日新高。 这使得本地累计确诊病例增至26起;今日有五人出院,累计出院114人,不过仍有14人需待在加护病房。 今日新增确诊病例有17例都属入境病例,其中两起与早前病例有关联。但也有其中四例感染源头不明。 一些病患到过欧洲各国 第244例是53岁男公民,与早前的36岁男公民有关联,他们上月26至29日曾在德国、29至本月7日在意大利、本月7至14日到过瑞士。 7日人在意大利时,他就已出现症状,返国后15日就被送到鹰阁医院,昨日中午确诊。在入院前他曾前往河谷路(River Valley Road)的住家式办公处,住在亚历山大路一带。 76岁确诊病患在滨海盛景西座上班 第245例是76岁男公民,近期未到过境外感染重灾区,12日出现症状,15日就被送到中央医院。入院前曾前往滨海盛景西座(Marina One West Tower)上班,住在文礼通道(Boon…