The Prime Minister’s Office has responded to suggestions that the public service should not be used to rebut articles in newspapers about the lawsuit against blogger Roy Ngerng by prime minister Lee Hsien Loong.
The following is the statement from the PMO:
This is in response to media queries over the propriety of recent letters by the Prime Minister’s press secretary to the Economist magazine, and the Singapore Consul-General in Hong Kong to the South China Morning Post.
The Economist article was on the Government’s Central Provident Fund policies. It referred to PM’s defamation suit over an allegation that the PM had misappropriated public moneys. When aspersions are cast on the integrity of the Prime Minister and his Government’s policies, an official reply from the PM’s press secretary is completely in order. This is no different from what press secretaries in most other Governments do.
Likewise, when a foreign newspaper carries an article with misrepresentations about Singapore, it is important that our diplomatic representative defend Singapore’s interests by correcting misrepresentations and providing a balanced view. Our Consul-General in Hong Kong did just that when he responded to the South China Morning Post article.
Read also:
Ngerng vs Lee – where does Civil Service stand?
Protecting the integrity and transparency of our electoral voting system
