“Opposition politicians who want a platform to share their ideas should organise their own forums. If their ideas are really better, people will support it. That’s how things work.” – Hri Kumar, Member of Parliament
TOC is by no means an opposition party, and we definitely don’t have the best ideas on the Central Provident Fund. But we do believe that there are people who do, and for a matter of national concern such as the CPF, it cannot just be a matter of partisan interest. A broader debate at a national level is necessary.
As such, we plan to organise a Policy Exchange forum on the CPF issue – open to all, to discuss what matters to all.
Roy Ngerng 600We would also like to welcome Roy Ngerng, blogger at The Heart Truths, as our moderator of this forum. We all know Roy as the “CPF blogger”, but few might realise that this will not be his first partnership with TOC. Roy has helped us previously with the lead-up articles for our Policy Exchange on healthcare in November 2013.
Roy would also not be the only voice at this forum – we hope to engage as many policy thinkers as we can.
What is the problem with the Minimum Sum and why are citizens unhappy about it? Are the CPF interest rates really justifiable? What is the problem with the lack of transparency in how citizens’ pension funds are used? Can we even think about junking the CPF system, and what are the alternatives? We hope to address some of these issues, and maybe more.
However, running an event needs money, and we need your generous support to make our events happen. As such, please use the following tabs below to donate to us, so that we may be able to continue with the Policy Exchange series.


Please note that event and funding matters, including for our Policy Exchange forums, will now be managed by TOC Ltd.
Donation via Paypal
For one time donation, click on the box of the value you would like to donate.
[wp_paypal_payment] For readers who wish to donate any sum other than the prefix donation amount, click on the button below.
Donate any amount
Donation via Bank transfer
For readers who wish to donate via internet banking or ATM transfer, our account number is 048-904435-7, DBS Current Account, Raffles Place Branch (048).
Cheques should be addressed to “TOC Ltd”.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

泰选委会指违反选举法 准备取消塔纳通候选资格

泰国选举委员会周二(4月23日)指责,著名反政府政治新星塔纳通违反了选举法,在大选后一个月的昨日,准备取消他的国会候选人资格。 40岁的泰国未来前进党党魁塔纳通,被指控在登记成为候选人后,仍然持有一家媒体公司的股份,因而触犯了选举法令。 自2014年军事政变以来,泰国首次全国大选的结果仍然不明朗,而将于5月9日公布的大选成绩,将决定支持军政的党派是否有足够席位让军政领导人巴育继续掌权。 选举委员会副秘书长Sawang Boonmee说道,“有证据证明,塔纳通是V-Luck Media公司的持有者或股东”。“根据宪法和选举法,它将无法成为议员候选人。” 塔纳通斥指控存政治动机 塔纳通此前曾否认违反选举法,表示在注册成为候选人之前,他已经于1月8日出售了该媒体公司的股份。他也指责有关的指控具有政治动机。 而目前,他有七天的时间向选委会举证,以反驳有关的指控。 若被判违反选举法罪名成立,塔纳通将被禁止竞选一年。而且他还可能因为参加选举而面临刑事指控,因为他在明知道自己资格不足的情况下参选,有可能被判10年徒刑和20年的政治禁令。 从荷兰返回泰国的塔纳通在脸书上贴文说到,“我刚刚得知必须尽快回国准备应对意外情况。泰国见” 。…

Salaries that are beyond reach, must still be logical

~by: Ravi Philemon~ Many Singaporeans, I believe, will agree that Ministers should…

PM Lee accepts invitation from US President Donald Trump to visit the White House

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has announced during the annual May Day…

建议允许员工打两份工 锺奇雄引网民炮轰

碧山大巴窑集选区议员锺奇雄,在国会中建议要取得更佳的就业保障,雇员应被允许从事两份工作,网民们炮轰,已经很多人兼职了,而且现在要有一份就业机会都少,还想要兼职,“这不是赶尽杀绝吗?”。 锺奇雄在国会上指出,雇主应该改变禁止员工兼职的想法,并鼓励员工学习和运用新技能来兼职。 他表示,有关建议并非让月光族有赚取额外收入的机会,而是让员工在公司或组织内扮演双重角色,尤其是不同领域或业务部门的工作。 他举例说,餐饮业受到疫情严重影响,但是超市和网上食品杂货店的生意就很好。“若一家公司能同时经营一家餐馆,并销售和运送食材,它或许就能很好地度过这难关。” 此外,他补充说,这些安排不应该影响员工的薪金。这可能意味着员工不会因为做两份工作而被减薪,但是也不会有额外收入。 他促请政府鼓励企业和员工采用这种方法。 或许锺奇雄是依据经验提出有关的建议,他就兼任了国会议员和新达房地产投资信托基金(Suntec REIT)的首席执行官。不同的是,锺奇雄成为兼职国会议员的薪金为1.6万元,而首席执行官的薪金也不少。 而受到疫情影响,新达信托旗下的新达城新加坡国际会议展览中心(Suntec Singapore)于上周宣布,裁退85名员工。这不禁让人们质疑,难道他没有尝试有关的建议吗?是否有采取行动避免裁员? 不少网民对他的建议感到无法接受,认为他并非真正了解民生。 网民纷纷表示,现在失业者众多,要获得一份工作已经很难了,还要让别人兼职来抢饭碗。…