lss
Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office, and secretary general of the National Trades Union Congress (NTUC), Lim Swee Say, has issued a statement to clarify a report by Channel Newsasia on 22 June.
Mr Lim pointed out that the report was “incorrect” and that one of the points he was making was “reported out of context”.
Below is Mr Lim’s letter to CNA.

I refer to the article, “Prepare for retirement ‘by using less CPF money when young'” (23 June).
The article para-phrased my comments and wrote, “The best way for Singaporeans to prepare for retirement is to use less of their Central Provident Fund (CPF) money when they are young.” It gave the impression that I have urged Singaporeans not to use their CPF monies before retirement for any purpose including housing, healthcare and education for our children.
This is incorrect.
For the record, I made three points about CPF:
Firstly, CPF is your money. Nobody can take away that money from you.
Secondly, your money with CPF is 100% safe and continues to earn risk free interest, even during challenging times like the global financial crisis in 2009.
As the third point was reported out of context, I reproduce the relevant text of my interview here:
“Thirdly, the money is mainly for your retirement purpose. Besides housing, healthcare and education for your children, a very important part of CPF is to cater for retirement. So, for every dollar, if you can defer the use of the dollar, it is better to defer the use of the dollar when you are still young. For example, instead of thinking of whether you can spend your CPF savings at the age of 55, I think we should think about how we should help our Singaporeans remain employed, to continue to earn a good living, a good job and at the same time, to continue to contribute to the CPF. Because the more money you have in your CPF and the longer you defer the use of the CPF, the more you will have for retirement, as all of us are living longer and longer. So, these are the three basic points: firstly, the CPF is your money, no one can take away from you. Secondly, your money is 100% safe. Thirdly, the less you make use of your money when you are young, the more money you will have for retirement.”
It is clear in this context that ‘young’ refers to those who are aged 55 and “less use” of the CPF money refers to the CPF cash withdrawal for purposes other than housing, healthcare and education for the children.
Lim Swee Say
Secretary-General
National Trades Union Congress

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

关闭南洋大学究竟是谁的主意?

作者-太史公孙, 原文刊登-南洋大学校友业余网站 由东南亚华人在已故陈六使为首的星马华社领袖辛辛苦苦建立起来的中国海外唯一华文大学,终于在1980年以“与新加坡大学合并为新加坡国立大学”的方式被关闭。 关闭南大(南洋大学)的部署,乃以1978年的“联合校园”为始。当年3月4日,南大理事会和新大理事会发表联合声明,宣布由本学年起,新大在武吉知马的校园,将成为新大和南大这两间大学共同课程的联合校园,让南大学生能够在讲英语环境里学习,提高英文水准。 1980年4月5日,南大理事会在和李光耀之间的一连串书信来往之后,终于发表声明,决定接受李光耀总理的建议,把新大与南大合并为“新加坡国立大学”(由南洋大学与新加坡大学组成)。 李光耀事后在多次场合谈到南大的关闭之事。最引人注目也被引述多次的是他在2000年出版的《李光耀回忆录1965-2000》。在此之前还有两次提到,一次是在1980年1月20日行动党二十五周年党庆大会上的演讲,另一次是在1980年3月29日写给南大理事会主席黄祖耀的信函。请看下列引述: 1。《李光耀回忆录1965-2000》,台北世界书局2000年,页173: “局势发展到1978年已经恶劣不堪,南大毕业的议员吁请我在他们母校水平跌至谷底乃至于最终垮掉之前插手干预。经过多年的接触,有一个人的判断是我所信赖的,他就是当时担任政务部长的庄日昆。庄日昆在处理人际关系方面很有一手,跟我又密切合作多年。包括协助我照顾选区。他使我深信,要让南大保持原状继续下去问题会更多,许多学生的事业前途将因此葬送,到时候。讲华语或方言的人定会责备政府袖手旁观,听任南大消亡。庄日昆的看法获得何家良、钱翰琮和李玉胜三位都是南大毕业的政务次长的大力支持。” 2。李光耀在1980年1月20日行动党二十五周年党庆大会上的致辞(英文): “即使在1978年当我建议把他们(南大学生)搬迁到联合校园,还有一些人持强烈的保留姿态。我之所以迁移他们是因为所有的南大毕业生国会议员要求我这么做;我在议会的南洋大学势力准备给我必要的支持。” 3。1980年3月29日李光耀致南大理事会主席黄祖耀信函(引自《南洋大学史料汇编》页556): “要摆脱这种束缚,就是只设一间大学。因此,南大出身的国会议员才建议把南大和新大合并成一间国立大学:使到相同的学位具有同等的市价”…

PDPC fines computer service vendor S$4,000 over programming error resulting in disclosure of NSmen’s personal data

The Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC) has issued a S$4,000 fine against…

Nurse at NTFGH emergency dept contracted COVID-19; she was at work prior to isolation

It was reported yesterday that there were 12 new cases of COVID-19…