Dear readers of TOC,
Several commenters on the discussion threads on our website have been banned, because they have violated our moderation policy – https://www.theonlinecitizen.com/moderation-policy/.
We do not care to repeat the offences here, but rest assured that we have the necessary evidence to prove our point.
We also noticed that these offensive comments were targeted at articles we posted about Roy Ngerng. We can only summise that this is a deliberate attempt by a certain group of individuals to disrupt meaningful conversations on this issue. It is also clear to us that some have joined our discussion threads recently for only this purpose. Some have also used multiple monikers in an attempt to go around the ban and cheat our moderation system. We assure you that this has not worked.
It is also unfortunate that these few violators have forced us to adopt steps that now require commenters to adhere to more stringent methods of identifying themselves. We apologise if these steps have caused you any inconvenience.
The TOC editors have our hands full working on content for the website. We value civil and genuine comments on our site, so that we can have as open a discussion as possible. Nevertheless, we will not hesitate to take further action against violations.
On that note, we would also like to make a request: If you see an offensive comment or someone whom you think is purposely inciting distress among users, please do not take it upon yourself to attack them, as it only makes the situation worse and risk having yourself banned, too. Instead, report it to us using the flag icon on the upper-right corner of the offensive comment. We might take a while to get to it, but we will not ignore it.
Regards,
The TOC editorial team

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

Viral message makes wild claim about Manpower Minister failing to handle spread of COVID-19 at dorms while her husband’s company earns well by building quarantine centres

Recently, a post about Manpower Minister Josephine Teo has been making rounds…

Chan says inflation low – ‘cost-of-living pressures’ due to difference in aspirations and ability to fulfil them

In Parliament today (10 Jul), Trade and Industry Minister Chan Chun Sing…

“All MPs and public have to be cognisant of the trade-offs” when Reserves are spent – WP chief Pritam Singh

When the Government uses or don’t use the funds in the Reserves,…

雅虎民调开吴作栋玩笑?80巴仙否定何晶能当好部长

荣誉国务资政吴作栋在英文传记《高难任务:吴作栋传》披露,曾接触过总理夫人何晶,询问她是否有兴趣参政。 “我曾询问何晶是否有意参政,那时她才28、30岁左右,还没嫁给李显龙。”他说,当时他何晶在国防部表现,认为她很有才质。 吴作栋称,知道何晶是总统奖学金得主和在国防部科研部门任职,但对她所知不深。不过后来收到简报了解更多资讯,得知她可以成为一位优秀和与众不同的部长。 “她没有说不,只是认为可以在其他阶段,当时她还年轻,”她告诉吴作栋年龄较大时可能再参政。不过后来他和李显龙结婚了。 吴作栋称,基于她已成为李氏家族的一份子,就再没找过她提起从政一事,因为“李显龙会反对、何晶也不赞同,新加坡人也不赞同。” 不知《雅虎新闻》是否刻意开吴作栋的玩笑,既然后者声称何晶可以成为好部长,那么民众是否这么认为呢?《雅虎新闻》就在前日召开民调,询问网民意见,是否同意吴作栋的观点,认为何晶能成为好部长? 共有5443网民参与民调,只有7巴仙赞同吴作栋的观点,10巴仙认为也许可以,但83巴仙投票者则表示不赞同何晶能当好部长。 有网民在留言中则指出,民调似乎含有讥讽成分;有网民认为,除非何晶能公开淡马锡基金营收、亏损明细,透明化施政才能对人民有交代,或许人民才能考虑她是否适合参政。 网民Stephen则提醒,现今的何晶是不可能去当部长的,她现今的收入至少是其丈夫的十倍。 去年入选福布斯百位富影响力女性 在去年,何晶入选福布斯百位最有影响力女性,排行第28。在2016年排行30、2015年排行43。自2004年以来,一直都在百位最有影响力女性榜单内。 淡马锡控股掌管国家主权基金,但何晶身为CEO的收入,至今仍是个谜。本社曾在8月份的一篇文章,根据淡马锡控股2018年度的86亿元行政开销作出推测,假定CEO的年薪,为行政开销的0.1巴仙,都相当于860万新元。