By Tiffany Gwee
Earlier this month, Singapore-based business and lifestyle blogger Ms. Grace Tan recently blogged about receiving a letter in the mail from a company known as ‘Singapore Company Register’. Her blog post is entitled “Singapore Company Register – Business Owners BEWARE!
The company asked for “verification” of her website. It stated in the mail that if she does not verify her information in 2 weeks, the company’s information “will be deleted from the Singapore Company Register database”.
To her disgust, she found out that the company “is a directory site trying to get companies to register with it for S$490 per year to get listed on the site”.
Ms. Grace attached a copy of the letter she received as shown below.
singapore-company-register
Not the Only One
Ms. Tan seems to be only one of many who received the same mail asking for registration. Just late last year, local newspapers reported about “an entity calling itself the Singapore Company Register” requesting for verification of details of various businesses and companies.
However, national regulator of business entities and public accountants ACRA had stated that it has “no links whatsoever” to the entity regarding this matter. They also mentioned that companies are “not obliged” to provide details to them and should only update their information with ACRA themselves.
The Singapore Company Register seems to be making its rounds again even after ACRA had firmly declared that the company is not part of them.
Not Understandable

In Ms. Tan’s blog post about the incident, she expressed much discontent with the situation as she alleged that the company might not be conducting their business in a legal, ethical and moral way.

“Tsk tsk. Why some people do business this way, I know not.”…“I can’t believe ACRA is letting this company continue to send out letters like that.”

Demanding the Removal of Post
Just yesterday, Ms. Tan received a lawyer’s letter sent to her by lawyers representing the company “Data Register Pte Ltd”, previously known as “Company Register Pte Ltd”.
In the letter, the company demanded for her blog post (entitled “Singapore Company Register – Business Owners BEWARE!”) to be taken down as the postings “are highly defamatory” to the company.
It states that there is “little or no basis” for her to suggest that the company is doing business in a way which is not legal, ethical or moral”.
Other than the removal of the post, the company also demanded an apology to be published on her blog, “as well as any other websites (she) has made the defamatory statements on”. The company has also asked for her to inform those whom she is aware “have read the posting” about the apology.
She is to give a reply as to whether she will comply with the demands of the company or not by 5pm today.
Not Complying with Demand

In an email to the media, Ms. Tan clearly expressed her stance on the issue.

“I will not comply with their demand. I abhor such unethical business practice – its threat of “company information” deletion has already caused many to register online without realizing that the company is not linked to ACRA, and that a deletion would essentially have zero repercussion on any company’s operations.”

CAD to Investigate
After informing ACRA about the company, they have informed Ms. Tan that the Commercial Affairs Department (CAD) “is now investigating this company”. She has also made a police report and personally wrote to CAD. ACRA had also warned against people registering with the company and has filed a total of 78 charges against the company.
Ms. Tan encouraged all who have been “harassed” via the issuance or demands for payment or “misled” by the company letters to either lodge a police report online here or write in to the CAD to inquire about the status of its investigation.
A letter regarding her situation had also been sent out to Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean, Minister Lim Hng Kiang, Mr. Patrick Tay and Ms. Penny Low.
Letter to Working with Grace – Fraud allegation

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

包括紧抱下属、捏臀部等 67岁高级公务员一项非礼控状罪成

被指涉嫌紧抱、非礼女下属等,一名在教育机构任职的67岁高级公务员,面对的五项非礼控状不成立,但法官判他一项控状罪成。 为了保护两名女受害者身份,法庭下令媒体不得揭露他们的身份资料。法庭文件显示,这名高级公务员面对九项非礼控状,包括他在2016年2月到12月之间,紧抱一名55岁女下属,让对方的胸部紧贴他的身体。 此外,还抚摸一名43岁女同事手臂和大腿、亲吻左肩膀,以及用下体触碰女同事的肩膀等。 至少六项控状指被告在工作场所犯案,法官裁定,涉及43岁受害者的其中五项控状不成立,不过涉及55岁受害者的一项控状成立。 由于没有独立证人,法官需依靠受害者和被告证词是否可靠。不过43岁受害者口供和庭上供证不一致;至于55岁受害者证词可靠,控方证据确凿。 案件延至下月4日,让辩方律师求情后下判,此外仍有三项指控公务员在国外犯案的控状待处理。 非礼罪最高刑罚为监禁两年,或罚款,或鞭刑,或任何两项刑罚组合。 基于被告年龄超过50岁,因此豁免鞭刑。

Leong Sze Hian invited by Amnesty International Hong Kong to talk about freedom on expression on Facebook Live

Amnesty International Hong Kong (AIHK) has invited blogger Leong Sze Hian to…

新山购屋住每日往返 我国公民护照被留字“不能住马国”

我国中年男子在马来西亚柔佛新山买房子住,每天我国和马来西亚柔佛州两地往返,近日通关时引起关卡人员注意,关卡官员随后更在其护照上留下“不能住马来西亚”的字眼。 男子的外甥近日将此事件和“留言”的照片上传到社交媒体上,引起网民的关注。 外甥指中年男子是新加坡人,但是在新山购屋,每天两地来回,但是在上周三准备入境马来西亚时,面对关卡人员的提问。 中年男子讲解了自己的情况后,官员竟然叫它卖掉新山的屋子,搬回新加坡去住,甚至在护照上“留字”。 外甥对此感到不满,因此在社交媒体上帖文,询问是否有明文规定外国人不能在马来西亚购房。 柔佛州移民局受询及时证实有关事件,发言人表示已经联络了护照持有人,目前调查正在进行中。 社交准证仅用于旅游 据我国外交部官网资料显示,我国可免签证进入马来西亚长达30天,而上载的护照照片中,也显示了入境西马半岛30天的准证盖章(社交准证)。 但是一名资深的马国律师则表示,社交准证仅允许新加坡公民到马国旅游,却不是定居。 他指出,外籍人士可申请马来西亚的“我的第二家园”计划,否则外国人只要购屋就能居住,和马国公民又有什么差别。据官网显示,只要拥有一定的财务能力就能申请,我国申请者必须拥有至少11万元的流动资产。 网民表示,其实关卡官员并没有真正做错什么,因为我国公民确实不能借着“拥有屋子”的理由,而居住在马国。 也有网民指出,其实很多人钻法律漏洞,为了赚取小钱,他们将新加坡的组屋出租了,然后在新山购屋居住。这些购屋者的选项住址包括了在新山的新山世纪花园(Taman…

Netizens express sadness over the passing of fake news law in Parliament

After a two-day debate that lasted slightly over 14 hours, the controversial…