Author Catherine Lim has responded to and refuted the Government’s rebuttal of open letter to the Prime Minister which she published on 7 June. (See here: “Open letter to the Prime Minister“.)

The following is Ms Lim’s latest response.

lhl

WITH reference to last Saturday’s report (“Govt refutes author’s claims over public trust”), I wish to make the following comments.

I share Singapore Consul-General in Hong Kong Jacky Foo’s admiring acknowledgment of the many achievements of the People’s Action Party (PAP) Government, especially its skilful handling of global-size problems such as the financial crises of 1997 and 2008 and the Sars epidemic.

But I disagree with Mr Foo’s argument that since the Government has achieved so much, since it has won every election and finally, since it meets the Edelman Trust Barometer benchmark, it surely has the people’s trust.

This depiction of the Singapore political situation fails to take into account its evolving dynamics and omits unflattering facts such as the shocking General Election of 2011. Even though the PAP won, it must have been forced to admit that the people’s trust had been seriously eroded as shown by the startling post-election effusion of apologies from the Prime Minister and his colleagues, and its promise to “listen more”, “communicate better” and use the “light footprint”.

Three years after GE2011, the trust has not been regained. The best proof lies not in the graffiti, the mass demonstrations or the raucous social media, but in the most unlikely place – within the PAP camp itself. Here, there are voices urging the leaders to connect better with the ground, reflecting awareness that the problem has become serious enough to warrant attention at the highest levels.

Hence, I would like to point out that the mistrust is very real, even if it involves only a minority. Its impact can be

seen in the Roy Ngerng defamation case. Although, as Mr Foo has rightly pointed out, the Prime Minister has every right to sue, to protect his reputation, the alarming truth is that an angry crowd will choose emotionalism over rationality, and insist that the defamation suit is one more instance of PAP bullying.

Mr Foo commented on my long history as a complainer. I have been writing political commentaries for 20 years now. Their central theme is the need for a robust, trusting relationship between the Government and the people, which, I strongly believe, is the only guarantee for a small country to survive in an increasingly perilous world.

Catherine Lim

Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

SPP: A difference can be made with powerful collective voices of the people

Below is a statement issued by the Singapore People’s Party to Singaporeans…

社论:人民海啸的预兆?

为了应付工人党市镇会诉讼的费用和可能的赔款,工人党三名领袖:前党魁刘程强、主席林瑞莲和秘书长毕丹星,在本月24日公开向公众募捐。 仅短短四日,截至27日,就募得107万6170元的捐款总额,共6千155各个人或团体踊跃参与捐款。这几乎等同,平均一天就募得25万,而且大多还是来自普通民众和支持者的捐款。 毕丹星在个人脸书感谢各界的支持,也通知民众募捐总数已足够,呼吁大家停止捐款,并表示稍后将为大家更新有关捐款用途的资讯。 “经济援助固然重要,但是大家在精神上的支持,却是无可衡量的。” 权且不论诉讼结果为何,惟三名领袖适时喊停募款,并未挟持民意对百姓予取予求,也清楚表明捐款的目的。至少在募捐这件事,对百姓有个清楚交代。 四天就募得100万元,是个什么概念?许多工人党支持者都来自草根阶层,也有自己的生活开支要负担,但还是有很多人义无反顾捐款,显示他们心中对三名领袖的信任。 但在这背后,如果领袖自身没有扎实的群众基础,如果没有用多年耕耘社区、服务选民的经历;如果当了国会议员只是坐在国会当“Yes Man”,白领薪水不为民发声,民众会愿意支持这样的领袖吗? 三名工人党领袖打官司,没有动用党资金,也没有使用公款,先是自掏腰包募款,实在不够,只好向民众募捐。筹款数目够了,就停止。也许还有更多民众愿意捐款?我们不得而知,但从此事来看,却似乎能看到,民众展现对反对党的支持,以及对反对党长期遭打压的状态感到不满。 古语言:擒贼先擒王,要瓦解一个组织,就的先把带头的砍下马。表面上,看起来这是两个市镇会,对三名领袖和市镇会理事追讨欠款,但其中一名控方律师文达星,却是行动党前议员,也是已故李光耀和李显龙御用王牌律师。鉴于被告都是政党人物,但是有亲执政党背景之嫌的文达星却未避嫌,肩担控方职务,在诉讼审讯期间也咄咄逼人。虽然无法干涉,但是坊间却对此次审讯的质疑却是存在的。 有些民众刚拿到300元的国家花红,就立马捐款给三领袖;他们原可用这些钱补贴高昂的水电费。假设我国执政党领袖也搞捐款,会有人相信吗?会有民间支持吗? 邻国马来西亚反对党,没有任何拨款,党的运作或任何活动,全靠民间支持。我国反对党在威权体制下,在恶法、社会操控和媒体等层次面面几乎都掌控在无所不包的当权者手中,反对党几乎是在夹缝求存。没有资源、没有可寻租的关系,想升官发财的人肯定不削加入反对党斗争。…

三肃毒局官员涉偷换尿液样本 被控妨碍司法公正

三名肃毒局官员涉嫌帮瘾君子偷换尿液样本,更利用其中一名官员的“干净”的尿液将其调换,今日(18日)三人被控妨碍司法公正。 据贪污调查局表示,该三名官员为43岁中央肃毒局上士长亚都拉曼(Abdul Rahman)、41岁上士长莫哈默哈菲兹(Mohamed Hafiz),以及31岁警曹莫哈默祖哈里(Muhammad Zuhairi)。三人涉嫌于兀兰检查站中将毒犯孟茂敏(译音,Maung Moe Min)的尿液样本偷天换日,换上哈菲兹“干净”的尿液样本,协助毒犯度过尿液测试。 肃毒局亦发表文告,证实有三名官员涉嫌偷换尿液,并表示在得知此事后,立即通报贪污调查局,全权配合贪污调查局的调查程序。 对此,肃毒局表示官员涉嫌偷换尿液是项严重的犯罪行为,必须严正以待,因而不会轻易宽容任何官员不当的行为。 案件今早过堂,将于下个月14日举行审前会议。而对于嫌犯,亚都拉曼表明不认罪,另两名嫌犯则未有任何表态。目前三人获准以一万元保释在外。 一旦罪成,被告将可能被判处七年监禁或罚款,或两者兼施。 三名被告涉嫌知法犯法,自今年7月起被中央肃毒局停职。

Pioneer of social medical work, Jean Marshall, dies at aged 94

Singapore says goodbye to social work pioneer Mrs Jean Marshall who died…