Ngerng addresses a crowd of thousands

By Howard Lee
Barely 15 minutes into the first speech, and there was already about 2,000 people gathered at Hong Lim Park to hear speakers talk about the Central Provident Fund and to demand that the government return CPF monies to citizens.
The crowd demographics was mixed – while there were many senior citizens, most of them were in the 30s to 40s, of typical working age.

Many came with umbrellas to brave the heat, but as the evening came and brought cool relief, participants started to move away from the shade of the tree line towards the stage.
Event organisers claimed there were 6,000 participants at the protest, although conservative estimates using photographs would put the total number of attendees at about 3,500. Even so, this number far exceeds the 1,200 sign-ups on the event’s Facebook page.
While not as numerous as those who attended the first Population White Paper protest, attendees gave some insights as to why this is the case – chiefly because they had a broad range of reasons for attending the protest.
Some were happy to be there to make up the numbers, as a visible sign of protest. Chris, 33, said, “I wanted to show support at this event, because a large crowd sends a signal to the government that we want changes made to the CPF system.”
His views were echoed by speaker Vincent Wijeysingha, who opined that the strong turnout would “make the government very worried, wherever they may be.”
Others were there to show support for Roy Ngerng, or at least express displeasure for the lawsuit that the Prime Minister has taken up against him. “Roy made a mistake, but suing him is not the way,” opined Mr Abdul Salim, 33. “(Prime Minister) Lee Hsien Loong want Singapore to be a more open society, to have more trust in the government. Then he (needs to) tell the people what the facts are, instead of suing.”
But the content of the protest was not lost on some, who were present because they were interested in an alternative view of CPF. Mr Weng, 64, said, “I try to attend all the events at Hong Lim Park. I’m not for or against any party, I try to stay neutral. But I’m interested to know what (the speakers) can bring forward.”
Jackson, 30, who was there with his friends, said, “I want to hear what the speakers have to say about CPF, as I wanted another point of view.”
JQ, 29, shared similar sentiments. “I want to know more about CPF and support those who are against the Minimum Sum – among my friends, this seems to be a major concern.”
Indeed, the Minimum Sum – the base amount of funds that each CPF contributor has to set aside for when they reach 65 years-old, the balance of which they can withdraw when they reach 55 years-old – seems to be a main concern of many participants at the protest.
“The Minimum Sum is increasing every year,” said Jackson. “I don’t think Singaporeans will be able to support this in the future.”
Jackson was not the only young Singaporean who was concerned about the future viability of the Minimum Sum. “The majority of Singaporeans, (looking at) how much we earn now, will not be able to meet this amount,” offered JQ.
“I’m very concerned – a few years down the road, what will the Minimum Sum be?” shared Mr Abdul Salim. “Can I meet it, can I take it out?”
“I want to get my money back,” said Mr Weng. “The government should not lock up our money. I have 40% of my CPF locked up (in the Minumum Sum). I mean, I’m a retiree now, and I tried asking the CPF front office for it, but they didn’t do anything.”
Ibrahim, 60, shared similar sentiments. “I am old enough to know how to spend my own money, so why does the government want to control my CPF? I want to use it to help support my daughter who is studying in Australia. I also need to spend some on my Hajj, as this is a very important religious obligation for me.”
“I tried speaking to my Member of Parliament, but he did not help. I’m not happy with it,” he added.
Despite these worries, concern for Roy Ngerng and the lawsuit he faces were evident among the protesters.
A mob followed him when he arrived, and his appearance on stage as the last speaker was met with wild cheers and calls of support. At the end of the event, a small crowd gathered at the stage to offer well-wishes and take pictures with him.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

We not stupid, ok?

~by: Siew Kum Hong~ The Straits Times ran a story on PAP MPs’…

分析师:投资者赌政府会出手”解救“凯发是错误观念

彭博社日前报导,凯发债权人需在明天(3月1日)前提交凯发对他们的债务证明。目前,该公司约有27亿元的无担保债务。 早前,凯发董事会回复新加坡证券投资者协会(SIAS),信中透露定下4月16日期限,与各相关者进行重组计划的协商。 去年10月,凯发获得”白武士“印尼财团SM Investment(SMI)的解救,财团注资超过四亿元,以换取凯发的60巴仙股权。 凯发欠下3万4000名散户投资者高达九亿元的债务。根据凯发早前宣布的重组计划,这些投资者最终可能只能拿回一成的本金。 散户投资者的这九亿元包括:五亿元的永久证券(perpetual securities)以及四亿元的优先股(preference shares)。 想当然尔,这批散户投资者都很愤怒,早前,他们也发动情愿,获得超过2000人签名,表达对重组计划的不满,认为对散户不公平。 根据重组协议,持有总共九亿元永久证券和优先股的投资者,将得回2700万元现金和10.26巴仙凯发股权。以每1000元的本金计算,可得回30.15元现金和价值76.39元的凯发股票,总计106.54元或本金的10.7巴仙。 投资者协会建议改善散户赔偿 证券投资者协会则在今日向凯发董事会建议,将或有负债(contingent…

柔边佳兰综合石化中心 今凌晨发生爆炸

马来西亚柔佛边佳兰石化综合发展中心(RAPID)工地,今日凌晨(4月12日)惊传爆炸事故,导致两名本地员工受伤。 根据马国媒体报导,爆炸事故发生在凌晨1时28分,该中心的紧急应对小组出动了五辆消防车,在凌晨2时15分才扑灭火势。 当地警方指出,两名伤者是年龄各28岁和30岁的保安,他们较后送往RAPID的紧急医药中心接受治疗。 据了解,国油(Petronas)公司已通知当地政府和相关单位,事故肇因仍在调查中。 当局將密切监控爆炸地点周围,目前还未有发现对周围自然环境造成影响。 事发时,在睡梦中的居民被强烈爆炸声震醒,爆炸的冲击力,也把当地包括大湾的民宅及边佳兰海军基地清真寺玻璃门窗都震碎。