rnlhl
Blogger Roy Ngerng Yi Ling has been served with a letter of demand by lawyers for Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.
The letter from Senior Counsel Davinder Singh, of Drew and Napier LLC, who is acting on PM Lee’s behalf, points to an article Mr Ngerng had written and published on 15 May.
The article was titled, “Where Your CPF Money Is Going: Learning From The City Harvest Trial”.
In it, Mr Ngerng drew comparisons between the case of the leaders of the said church, and the government’s management of monies in the CPF and the GIC, of which PM Lee is chairman.
“The article means and is understood to mean that Mr Lee Hsien Loong, the Prime Minister and Chairman of GIC, is guilty of criminal misappropriation of the monies paid by Singaporeans to the CPF,” Mr Singh’s letter said.
“This is a false and baseless allegation and constitutes a very serious libel against our client, disparages him and impugns his character, credit and integrity.”
Mr Singh added that it “is also clear the article was published maliciously.”
The lawyer’s letter then demanded the article be removed from Mr Ngerng’s blog site, and the links to the article on his Facebook pages be also similarly removed.
It also demanded an apology to be posted on Mr Ngerng’s blog, http://thehearttruths.com, and for Mr Ngerng to “compensate” Mr Lee by way of damages and to pay legal costs as well.
It gave Mr Ngerng three days to accede to the demands, failing which legal proceedings would be commenced against Mr Ngerng, the letter said.
Mr Ngerng posted the letter of demand on his website, titled, “I Have Just Been Sued By The Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong”.
In that posting, Mr Ngerng said, “Today, I am finally being silenced. It is disappointing that the government has decided to turn against ordinary Singaporeans.”
While not indicating if he would accede to the letter’s demands, Mr Ngerng nonetheless urged his readers that “it’s time we stand united.”
“It’s time we fight,” he said.
Mr Ngerng, who has organised an event on 7 June at Speaker’s Corner to call for the government to return Singaporeans’ CPF money, is being represented by Mr M Ravi.
In January last year, Mr Lee had also issued a letter of demand to another blogger over another article.
His letter then was to Mr Alex Au who writes on the Yawning Bread website.
Mr Lee had claimed that Mr Au’s article, entitled “PAP mis-AIMed, faces blowback”, together with 21 other comments that the blogger allowed to be posted on his site, “can be taken together to suggest that PM Lee is guilty of corruption in relation to the transaction between the PAP town councils and the firm Action Information Management (Aim)”, the Straits Times reported then.
Subsequently, Mr Au removed the article as demanded and issued an apology to Mr Lee.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

A failed restructuring will be painful for all: Lim Swee Say

In his May Day message, Labour Chief Lim Swee Say warned that…

Palm oil giant Wilmar caught in forest scandal – Greenpeace

Household brands such as P&G, Reckitt Benckiser and Mondelez exposed to tiger…

No voting NO: Burmese embassy staff contrive to disenfranchise voters

Selene Cheng Burmese national desperate to vote goes topless, but still no…

被控无准证办集会、拒签口供有罪 高庭驳回范国瀚上诉

社运份子范国瀚因无准证举办集会、拒签署口供,合共被罚款3200元,不服判决于日前(10月4日)向高庭提出上诉。惟今日被高庭裁决驳回上诉。 根据书面判词,高庭法官蔡利民驳回范国瀚辩护律师杜莱辛甘的辩述。后者指当时范所举办的“公民抗命及社会运动”论坛,只不过是“讨论”和“分享有关公民不服从的观点和经历”。 范国瀚在2016年11月26日,在新民巷美景城(Midview City)的AGORA,主办“公民抗命及社会运动”论坛,邀请香港“黄雨伞运动”中的学运领袖黄之锋,透过Skype与现场观众连线对谈交流。 法官指出,控方展示范国瀚有意透过上述活动,认可“透过公民不服从带来社会改革”,这属于“集会”的范畴。 “依我之见,如讨论涉及捍卫/主张某一立场、宗旨或运动,也形同在宣扬相关志业。” 尽管论坛的主题相对中立,惟法官也指出在脸书对有关活动的简介,可见其“并非纯粹中立的学术讨论”。有关简介指将邀请香港众志秘书长黄之锋,与本地社运分子施兰以及韩俐颖,分享公民不服从和民主,在营造促进进步和改变的社会运动扮演的角色。 法官认为,有鉴于黄之锋的身份,范国瀚邀请对付参与讨论,就显示范认同透过公民不服从带来社会改革的志业。 至于范国瀚被指拒签口供,法官指出警方有法律权力,要求供证者签署口供,以保障口供的可靠性。 控方曾要求调高保释金至1万5000元 法院是在今年1月3日裁定,范国瀚被指无准证举办集会,且拒绝签署口供,被判有罪。他因无准证办集会被罚2000元或10日监禁,而拒绝签口供被罚1200元或6日监禁。 据功能八号氏族会总监张素兰在脸书分享,控方曾要求提高保释金至1万5000元,所幸范国瀚辩护律师回应,范没有潜逃的风险,也真诚地出庭,法庭也驳回了控方的要求。…