In continuation with the defamation lawsuit between Blogger Roy Ngerng Yi Ling and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. Lawyer M Ravi has confirmed with the law firm, Drew & Napier representing PM Lee that he will be accepting the service of process on behalf of Ngerng.
Just yesterday, a letter was sent from PM Lee saying that the apology given by Ngerng was completely insincere and was designed to mislead PM Lee and the public.
The letter further added that despite Ngerng giving his word to remove the offending posts and video as requested by PM Lee, he continued to make it available to a select group of people and send out the emails to a wide audience, including the local and international media where he republished the video and offending posts. The senior counsel said Ngerng has himself to blame for losing the opportunity of not having to pay aggravated damages and asked if M Ravi would be accepting the service of process on behalf of his client.
The demand for the 4 articles and video to be taken down was made in a letter sent on the 26th May. The letter wrote,

“If your client immediately removes them (the 4 articles and 1 video) and undertakes in writing through you by 5pm today that he will not further aggravate the injury and distress to our client through similar other posts, videos or other  means, our client will, provided that the posts and videos are not republished and the undertaking is honoured, be prepared not to claim any aggravated damages form your client.”

M Ravi wrote in his reply that the wording of “similar other posts” in the letter sent on 26th May should not curtail the Ngerng’s right to his freedom of expression to write or engage the public on the CPF issue and raise any matters relation to CPF. Any attempt of doing so would be frowned upon by Article 14 of the Singapore’s constitution.
M Ravi also confirms in the letter that he has instructions to accept service of process on behalf of Roy Ngerng.
 
Attached below is the letter sent by M Ravi to PM Lee.

Letter to Drew and Napier 28.05.14

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

议员身兼二职 客户和公众利益,孰轻孰重?

在本月升任律政部兼卫生部高级政务部长的唐振辉,认为过去分身担任城市丰收教会案辩护律师,并没有造成任何利益冲突。 唐振辉受理城市丰收教会失信案期间,担任政府国会内政及律政委员会副主席。他在该案为该教会创会牧师康希辩护。 他在接受亚洲新闻台专访时透露, 他理解担任该失信案辩方律师然他招来很多负评,被抨击这不是人民行动党议员所为,“但我不会道歉,重来一次我还是会做同样决定。这是我的工作,有人把案子带到律师楼,要我受理。” 他说,律政部长尚穆根,也强调宪法保障任何人都有权在法律面前选择自己的辩护者。如果律师因为被批评而不敢为受害者请命,那么我们的法治精神是匮乏的。 他补充,难道身为行动党议员,就不能作为律师为嫌犯辩护?那么身为医生的议员是否就不能为嫌犯治病? 去年4月,高庭三司在二对一的情况下,用刑事法典第406条文,以较轻的失信罪惩罚丰收教会案的失信者。今年初,最高法院上诉庭也维持原判,没有接受控方要求,加重康希和五名副手的罪刑。 上诉庭解读,“代理”应为职业代理,即保险经纪和房地产经纪等,不包括公司董事。 唐振辉担任康希辩方律师。他在专访中辩解,有关条文多年不曾修改,已不合时宜,存在缺陷。他指出丰收教会领导并不属“专业代理”,以409条文对付康希并不恰当,法律规定刑罚是根据被告的层次而定。 “我很庆幸我能够把道德情感从我的专业态度中区分出来。作为律师我陈述眼前的事实。” 是议员又是辩方律师 尚穆根在今年2月曾表示,有关刑罚太轻,考虑在国会讨论,提高高级职员失信的刑罚。…

Dr Ang Swee Chai the ‘Euro Communist’?

by: Teo Soh Lung/ Dr Ang Swee Chai, a prominent surgeon and…

ReCAAP: Three ship robbery incidents occurred within two hours in Singapore Strait

Three incidents of armed robbery had occurred on board ships underway in…

群众问是否请反对党“群策群力”? 王瑞杰左右言他

上周六(15日),副总理王瑞杰出席由民情联系组(REACH)和亚洲新闻台主办的“群策群力,共创未来”对话会。在对话会上他倡议让国民也有机会能参与制定、涉及政策,并表示第四代领导团队自踏入政坛后,就不断与各界人士交流,倾听民声、广纳民意。 在问答交流环节,就有一名大巴窑的居民询问,出席对话会的群众是如何筛选而来?是否有反对党成员获邀参与? 这名民众认为,反对党也同样是积极参与建设民主社会的公民,既然政府要落实“以行动彰显民主的社会”,也应邀请反对党合作,才能达成真正的多元化。 对此,王瑞杰是这么回答的: “只要你的心是为了新加坡和国人好,我们可以和任何人合作。” 但他又指出,多元的观点不一定来自反对党,它可以来自方方面面,即便在内阁会议,部长们也会意见相左。 “让我们去辩论各种选项是好事。但是应避免有不同的目的,因为团结才是最重要的。迄今为止我们能引领新加坡前进,是因为我们拥有共同的目标。在共同目标下,我们可以讨论谁的方案、概念更好”。 不过,他并没有正面回应,究竟有关对话会,有没有邀请反对党成员出席、或未来有没有打算邀请。 至于对话会主持人Steven Chia则解释,并没有依据政党背景筛选对话会出席者。与会的大多涉足或在特定领域为新加坡作出贡献。 据了解,受邀者不乏非政府组织、福利团体、环保分子、工会、障友和宗教团体代表。 与会者对王瑞杰抛出涵盖社会流动、税务、社会包容性、年轻人处境等议题。…