TCJ
The following is a blog post by the Minister for Manpower, Tan Chuan Jin, posted on Sunday night.
It is titled “The Truth About Our CPF and the Minimum Sum”:
PART I – Our CPF System
“CPF is my money. Why can’t I use it as I please?”
“The CPF is a scam. It is how the Government cheats you of your money.”
“Government is raising the Minimum Sum to keep you from taking your money.”
We have been hearing some of this online. In many dialogues and conversations, I have asked if people actually read about what CPF is really about. Most admit that they don’t. But there are also those, especially the ones keen on financial planning, who put out thoughtful pieces to help Singaporeans understand how it helps.
Let me state that the CPF is put in place to help Singaporeans have peace of mind when it comes to their retirement years. With increasing longevity, it has become even more important to help Singaporeans sustain their retirement adequacy for longer. There are 3 main points I would make.
1) CPF helps us to retire.
2) CPF is your money. You are already using it! Everyone has received their CPF monies plus top-ups and interest.
3) The Minimum Sum is increasing because we are living longer so we need to spread out our payouts.
CPF Helps Us to Retire
We will all retire one day so we need to prepare for it. The CPF is how Singapore does it.
Many countries do the same through a pension system. They collect taxes or get citizens to contribute to a social security fund. This pooled monies is then paid out to citizens who reach a certain age. However, many of these systems are facing challenges, because those who are young are now paying for the old. As most countries age, there are less and less young people paying for more and more aged people. The status quo cannot hold. Either taxes will have to rise, or old people will get a lower and lower pay-out. The pension payout age is also being increased.
In Singapore, we have the CPF. Rather than pool all our monies together, every individual saves for his own retirement via his personal individual CPF account. We contribute monthly into the account. Our employers contribute too. The Government also contributes into the accounts for those who need more, through Workfare and other schemes such as Pioneer Generation Package. We then make sure this CPF account grows at a reasonable interest rate without risk. In fact, your CPF monies are backed by the full faith and credit of the Singapore Government – only one of a few countries in the world with a triple A credit rating from all of the world’s major credit rating agencies.
Money in your CPF account is your money
Unlike most other systems, our CPF does more than just give us a monthly pension. We use it to help own our homes and pay for healthcare. In countries where a significant proportion of retirees do not own their homes or are still servicing their mortgages, pension payments have to be used for these costs. As the vast majority of Singaporeans including lower income retirees own our homes, paid for out of our CPF, and have fully paid our loans, we do not need to use our CPF LIFE payouts to pay for rentals. Many of us are already using our CPF monies to fund expenses that would otherwise have come from our disposable income.
The Minimum Sum is increasing because we are living longer so we need to spread out our payouts.
In many other countries, pension monies are not drawn out in a lump sum, but paid out monthly. This helps retirees spread out the use of their retirement savings over their retirement years.
When the British introduced the CPF scheme in 1955, we could withdraw all our savings at 55. Do we remember what our retirement age was then? It was 55. What was the life expectancy in 1955? It was about 60. Hence, what you withdrew at age 55 would have to last you for just a few years.
Today, the retirement age is at 62 and we could be re-employed until 65. And life expectancy is at least 82 and rising fast. For those turning 65 years old today, 1 in 2 will live beyond 85, and 1 in 3 beyond 90. What would happen if we withdrew everything at age 55? Or even 65? Would we ourselves be able to manage our monies for two decades or more?
Unfortunately, most savers are unable to achieve good returns with low risk. Many have lost money because they chose the wrong products to invest in, or because of market downturns that occur in their retirement. Would we have peace of mind if we were subjected to the same uncertainties? What would happen if our monies ran out? Who would bail us out?
This is why the CPF Minimum Sum matters.
As we retire, we will need more money, because
1. We are living longer. In fact, we can probably expect to live 10 years longer than our parents did. Unless we intend to work and retire much later, we will spend more years in retirement.
2. Prices will increase over time. The same things will cost more as the years go by. Although prices of basic items have gone up by less in Singapore than in most other advanced countries, the fact is the cost of living will go up over time.
3. Our daily needs have increased. What we consider to be “basic” has changed over the years. The food we eat is of better quality, the medicine that we consume is more advanced, and technology that we now enjoy didn’t exist before. So our daily needs have increased. This is a good thing, because it means that our quality of life has increased.
Hence, the Minimum Sum has been increasing over time. When we turn 55, we set aside a Minimum Sum from our savings in the Ordinary and Special Accounts (OA/SA) to meet out [sic]  retirement needs, and we can withdraw any remainder (see footnote).
In 2003, we wanted the Minimum Sum to be able to meet the expenditure needs of a lower-middle income retiree couple. This was why we decided in 2003 to bring the Minimum Sum from $80,000 then, to a target of $120,000 in 2003 dollars. The target was to be reached over a period of 10 years, so that by 2013, a lower-middle income retiree couple could have had their expenditure needs met.
Many have forgotten that this is what we decided to do many years ago and are surprised each year when the Minimum Sum is raised.
In fact, we pushed back the target by another two years to 2015 so as to make the increases more gradual because of higher inflation in recent years.
So remember: The current Minimum Sum for someone turning 55 from July 2014 is $155,000, after adjustment for inflation. This sum will provide about $1,200 per month, for life, through CPF LIFE. This is estimated to be what a lower-middle income retiree household requires to meet their basic daily needs. This is far more than the $230 per month that we would have received if the Minimum Sum had remained at the original $30,000, which was the Minimum Sum in 1987 when we first started the scheme.
PART II – Misconceptions about the Minimum Sum
When I read through some online discussions, I realised that there were a few misconceptions about what the Minimum Sum means. Many are unfamiliar with what is available on the CPF website or some of the clarifications on MOM Facebook and Factually. Encouragingly, some personal finance blogs have helpfully tried to clarify, such as DrWealth, cheerfulegg, DollarsandSense, and SGYoungInvestment.
Let me try to clarify a few main points again.
First, if you did not have sufficient savings to set aside the Minimum Sum at age 55, you do not need to top up the shortfall in cash. You also do not need to sell your property just so that you could meet the Minimum Sum!
Second, only half of the Minimum Sum must be maintained in cash. The savings above that can be used for housing needs. Any contributions into the Ordinary Account after age 55 can also still be used for housing.
Is the Minimum Sum achievable?
Yes it is achievable. Even as the Minimum Sum has increased in recent years, more and more Singaporeans have been able to attain the Minimum Sum. About half of active CPF members are able to now, compared to one third just five years earlier.
We expect even more CPF members to meet the Minimum Sum over time. In a study commissioned by MOM, two local academics, Dr. Chia Ngee Choon and Dr. Albert Tsui from NUS, estimated that about 70% – 80% of new entrants to the workforce would be able to meet the Minimum Sum for their cohort. This is a definite improvement but we should still aim to do better.
Are you in trouble if you do not meet the Minimum Sum?
A number of older Singaporeans are not able to meet the Minimum Sum because they were working when Singapore was still developing and wages were low. These vulnerable Singaporeans may need help if they do not have family support. We will help them. Indeed, we introduced the Pioneer Generation Package so as to help lighten the burden of their healthcare costs.
There are those who do not meet Minimum Sum because they did not work regularly. But many among these may have a spouse or family who are able to support them.
Furthermore, the majority of older Singaporeans own their homes. Many prefer to hold on to their homes and rely on their children for support in their retirement years if their own savings are inadequate. But there are several schemes to help them if they wish to get cash from their homes. Besides renting out rooms, which many do, they can move to smaller flats or make use of the Silver Housing Bonus and the Lease Buyback Scheme.
I know there are also low-income workers who need more help. This is why we introduced Workfare, which pays into the CPF accounts of lower-wage workers. And that is why we pay an extra interest of 1% for the first $60,000 of CPF savings of every Singaporean so that those with lower balances can grow their savings faster. We also raised the amount that employers must contribute to CPF recently, especially for older workers and lower-wage workers.
We are looking into other ways to further strengthen our support for those who might need more help.
In summary
I believe that our CPF is a good system and a fair one. It is also a more sustainable system than most other retirement schemes. Your CPF funds are absolutely safe.
Would we be better off if we dismantled the CPF Minimum Sum and left it completely to individuals to provide for their retirement themselves? It is tricky providing for many years of retirement. We believe it is prudent to set aside a portion of our monies to be managed via the CPF system so as to provide the basic needs of retiree households. Individuals continue to decide how they use the rest of their monies. And the truth is, CPF monies are already being drawn upon for a range of uses. Some have even argued that we should tighten this.
We will continually strengthen our CPF system to improve the assurance we can provide our seniors for their retirement, healthcare and housing needs.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

律师打人视频再流传 萧丁明报警反击“玩火者”

本地“明星律师”萧丁明已经针对早前泄露,有关他于一年前肢体和语言攻击两名名女性员工的两个视频,向警方报案。 他也于周五(4月26日)发表声明,对那些不断且存心伤害他的人进行反击。 现年46岁的萧丁明,是萧丁明律师事务所的经理,且开设光线演艺经纪公司(Beam Artistes)。他是一位知名的娱乐律师,曾担任本地前艺人郑雪儿(Michelle Saram)以及女歌手蔡健雅的代理律师。 事件于去年发生 双方和解 据报导,于周四(4月25日)开始在优管上流传的视频中,遭殴打的光线演艺经纪公司员工已经于去年报警了。当时,他被指控在不同事件中,对两名员工进行肢体和口头攻击。 两个视频明显是办公室闭路电视摄像头所拍下,显示了当天的日期2018年4月17日。 在首个约1分钟的视频中,萧丁明正在和一名长发女员工说话,随后他扬起右手数次拍打女员工的脸部和上半身。他也数次用手大力推女员工的额头。 在第二个约6分钟的视频中,萧丁明追捕同一名女员工,还重复喊道“你打我”。两人随后互相攻击,多名员工自办公室外进来劝架和拉开萧丁明,女员工被带离开办公室。 随后,萧丁明又和另外一名原本来劝架的女员工发生语言冲突,甚至将对方推到在地上,在场同事见状立刻再次趋前阻拦。…

导致46人受伤包括一死者 去年PMD相关火患数量倍增

新加坡民防部队12日发布年度统计数据,与个人代步工具(PMD)相关的火患在去年几乎增加了一倍。 当局指出,与PMD相关的火患自2015年开始的首宗后,每年都持续增加,但是2019年却由 2018年的52宗“急速上升”至102宗。 相反的,与电动脚车(PAB)相关的火患则从2018年的22宗,下降至去年的13宗。 政府为了解决和减少与PMD相关的火患,已经于去年成立由属各单位,包括民防部、陆路交通管理局和建屋发展局等机构组成工作队。民防部队指出,去年涉及火患的PMD,都未持有UL2272认证,而且部分PMD还经过改装,尤其是在电池部分。 去年涉及PMD和PAB火患造成了46人受伤,比2018年的26名伤者增加了77巴仙。46人中,还包括一名40岁的男子,自发生于武吉巴督的相关火患中获救后送院,却不治身亡。 民防部队指出,去年将近七成此类火患发生在住家,因此敦促民众,尤其是PMD持有者在处理工具时要保持警惕,否则可能导致人命伤亡和财务损失的火患。 基于此类火患的增加已经引起关注,当局将持续强调相关的消防安全风险,并通过社会和主流媒体教育民众有关的防范措施。“所有未持有UL2272认证的PMD也必须被送到指定地点进行销毁。” 当局补充,此类的火患有了明显下跌的趋势,而11月实施的PMD在行人道上行驶禁令起了显著影响。 民防部队指出,在2019年当局接获2862通火患通报电话,比前年增加了8巴仙。 植被火患增加五成 报告指出,37巴仙的火患是由随意点燃的材料,如未熄灭的烟头、木炭所引起,成为火患的主要肇因,而电线短路成为第二主要肇因。…

Recovery of novel coronavirus in China is “all fake”, according to local whistleblowers and residents

When the deadly novel coronavirus (COVID-19) struck the city of Wuhan in…

SMRT officer dies after succumbing to injuries sustained in accident at Bishan Depot

  An SMRT staff working at the Bishan Depot died on Monday…