colmt
“Having higher aspirations in life is a reason why Singaporeans find the cost of living here expensive, despite real wages having gone up,” the TODAY newspaper reported Minister of Defence, Ng Eng Hen, as having said on Saturday, 10 May.
Dr Ng was speaking at a Singapore Medical Association (SMA) dinner. He was responding to a question from an audience member about the rising cost of living in Singapore.
“If you look at household goods, per household, what people have – handphone, TV – has actually gone up,” the minister said. He added that now, unlike the past, “mobile phones are almost an essential item for children.”
According to TODAY:

“That Singaporeans find costs of living expensive due to higher aspirations is a reason that will not please people, including himself, said Dr Ng, as the reason is ‘objective’ and does not address ‘issues of the heart’.”

In recent months, the issue of cost of living in Singapore has been in the spotlight, especially after the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) released a report in March which ranked Singapore as the most expensive city in the world to live in. [See here: “Sing on a shoestring”.)
eiu
The EIU report drew a dismissive response from Singapore’s Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister, Tharman Shanmugaratnam, the next day.
Mr Tharman said reports like that of the EIU “are meant to measure cost of living for expatriates in various parts of the world, and thus do not reflect those of local residents.”
He said, “In the last five years alone, if you take our middle-income households, our median households, their incomes have gone up faster than the CPI index, the cost of living. In fact, it’s gone up by 10 per cent in real terms.”
But Mr Tharman’s reassurance may be little comfort to the average Singaporean who feels the pinch on a daily basis.
In the last few years, as costs escalated, low- and middle-income Singaporeans felt the pinch the most.
In a March 2011 report, the TODAY newspaper said:

“From basic necessities to hawker meals, from holidays to that new car, from healthcare bills to expenses related to starting and raising a family, it seems that Singaporeans are certainly feeling the pinch of higher prices, according to a Today survey of voters living in the heartlands. Eight in 10 of the respondents said they were worried that such expenses were getting much more expensive.”

And in February 2013, a poll by the government’s own feedback unit, REACH, found that “cost of living issues are the top concerns of Singaporeans.”
col2013b
The fears and worries continued into 2014, with even the younger ones expressing concerns about the cost of living and whether they will be able to find jobs which will pay enough to meet such costs.
In March 2014, the Straits Times reported that “nine out of the 15 young people” it interviewed at a dialogue session with Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said they worried they would not be able to afford “basic goods”, namely a flat and a car.
This came “amid rising costs and more intense competition for jobs and at work”, the paper said.
One of the youths interviewed said she “[hoped] to be able to take care of my family and myself with my meagre salary in the future.”
youths
The issue is evidently serious and important enough for PM Lee to mention it on two major occasions so far this year – in his speech at the NTU Ministerial Forum in January; and in his May Day message recently.
“We think in Singapore that we invented the ‘cost of living’, but we did not invent the ‘cost of living’,” Mr Lee said in January, adding that other countries also face the issue. He nonetheless acknowledged that in Singapore “many people worry about job security, cost of living, whether they can do better than their parents.”
In his May Day message, Mr Lee said, “If you compare to any other country in the world, I think we are doing well but we are going through changes, difficult ones and it has brought stresses and strains, competition, anxiety, widening income distributions, worries over cost of living.”
In trying to explain the reasons for Singaporeans’ fears about the issue, Dr Ng perhaps has lost sight of the reality on the ground for the average person. Indeed, his argument is in fact an old one which was used by the government in the past.
In an article in the Straits Times in February 2005, Ms Ling Chien Yien wrote about why Singaporeans complain about the cost of living, and why government statistics do not reflect reality. Her reply could very well be in response to what Mr Tharman had said (see above):

“Statistics may show that growth in income is faster than increases in living costs. But in reality, the middle- and low-income families find it hard to share this optimism. Their complaints against the heavier burden of living costs and price hikes are not without reason.”

In his reply, Chen Hwai Liang, then Press Secretary to the Prime Minister, offered arguments similar to those of Dr Ng’s:

“While costs have gone up modestly, they have not been the main reason that households have felt pressure. Nobody wants to turn back the clock to the days before air-conditioners or handphones, or when only a small minority could afford overseas travel, even though costs might have been lower then.”

Mr Chen added:

“The way forward is to create more prosperity and growth, so that Singaporeans can get better jobs, and attain the higher standards of living that we all aspire to.”

Still, to effectively blame the cost of living on Singaporeans’ “higher aspirations” or perception, as Dr Ng evidently did, is “disingenuous”, says blogger Ng E Jay.
“Dr Ng Eng Hen is widely off the mark,” Mr Ng wrote on his blog in response to Dr Ng’s remarks.
“The high cost of living in Singapore is not a matter of perception alone, and neither is it merely a result of Singaporeans having higher aspirations and expectations in life.”
Two of the causes, he says, are rental and the cost of raw materials.
For example, “businesses, faced with increased rental costs, have no choice but to pass the costs onto consumers, or risk shutting down.”
“That is why the prices of so many of our daily necessities and conveniences of life have gone up so quickly,” Mr Ng wrote. “Hawker fare and prices at food courts have soared in recent years precisely because of rapidly rising rentals.”
He said that “unlike many developed countries where the cost of living is indeed beyond the government’s control, inflation in Singapore is instead generated by the government’s policies.”
“The government has taken in so many foreigners but not increased the supply of housing, and social and educational services to accommodate the increased demand,” Mr Ng said. “It does not take a genius to figure out why prices have risen so rapidly. The government has failed to build infrastructure and increase the level of social support ahead of demand. In the end, it is the citizens who suffer.”

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

本地幼园出现确诊病例 关闭两天进行清洁消毒

国际商业园的新意元幼源( Creative O Preschoolers’ Bay)昨日传出武汉冠状病毒的确诊病例,而该幼儿园,也宣布在今日(5日)起关闭两天,进行消毒清洁工作。 幼儿园关闭期间,所有教职员需领缺席假,而幼儿园则将在下周一(9日)恢复运作。 据卫生部昨日声明,一名62岁女公民,在昨日早上确诊,此前曾前往新意元幼源工作,不过她不是教职员,而是厨房助手。 他在上月21日工作数小时后便感到身体不适,立即求诊,自那日起便拿病假,再未踏入幼儿园。此前未到过任何感染重灾区。当局认为她与此前的第94例(64岁女公民)有关,并追踪曾密切接触的人。 新意元幼源校长陈鸣鸾接受《联合早报》访问,表示自政府宣布橙色警戒后,家长都不敢带孩子回到中心,直至近日出席率才慢慢恢复八成,却没想到仍然会发生此事。 期间,中心一直有在做定期消毒,此前最后一次的消毒在上周六,而这两天也会关闭消毒清洁,最后也希望该名妇女能够早日康复。 社会及家庭发展部长李智陞也在脸书发文回应,幼儿培育署将会密切留意并于管理层和职员及家长合作,确保孩童的健康。

【冠状病毒19】第26例死亡病例 73岁本地老翁病逝

根据卫生部文告,一名在今年3月9日确诊的73岁新加坡公民,与病魔对抗逾三个月,不幸在12日病逝。 该名老翁也是来自裕廊战备军人协会俱乐部(SAFRA)歌唱班新春晚宴感染群。属第161例病例。 卫生部也指老翁有高脂血症、高血压和慢性肾脏疾病的病史。当局已联系死者家属以提供协助。

两国商讨协议修改内容 新柔捷运项目展延至明年4月

我国将在明年4月底之前,签署三项有关新柔地铁系统的协议。 据交通部许文远在国会书面答复中透露,目前两国正在就马国的要求讨论,修改新柔地铁的双边协议,而马来西亚于今年10月29日要求展延(至2020年4月30日),我国也同意展延多六个月,商讨协议修改内容。 尽管马方已决定继续该项目,但仍未透露对协议的修改细节。 其三份协议包括修正协议、联营发展协议及、特许协议。其中联营发展协议与特许协议是原定于去年签订。 对此,马国交通部长陆兆福则表示,马新两国需要六个月的时间达致和认同期限,并非所谓的马方要求给予展延。 他表示,由于该计划需要修正,因此需要展开联合工程研究工作,而政府将会与我国协调成立联合咨询委员会,在所有协议的修正后,则会签约三份协议。 新柔捷运计划在希盟政府接管后,六次展延,其延期原因为马方需要检讨该项目的可行性与成本。 日前,马国要求展延新柔捷运系统(RTS)将期限延长至10月31日,马国首相表示,由于需优先处理前朝政府所欠下的债务,才会更需要时间做出规划。  

State of emergency declared in Bangkok, Thailand

Thailand has just declared a 60-day state of emergency in Bangkok and…