By SY Lee and Leong Sze Hian 
Less pay is okay, say older workers” (Straits Times, May 3) takes the top news of the day. It is said that 70% of the 50 seniors polled in the a survey, would want to work beyond 65 even if means a cut in their paycheck.
The current legislation, Retirement and Re-employment Act (RRA) which covers re-employment after the retirement age, states that healthy workers who hit the retirement age of 62 must be offered re-employment until 65, or a one-off payment.
The RRA would, however, not apply to certain categories of employees who have been exempted by the Minister for Manpower under the Act. The employer can also choose not to offer re-employment to the employee if the employee is assessed by his employer to not have satisfactory work performance or not medically fit to continue working. (See here)

It is stated in Ministry of Manpower (MOM)’s website that employees can seek help if they have any re-employment dispute:

  • By seeking the union’s advice and assistance (if the employee is a union member);
  • Notify the Commissioner for Labour (COL) in writing:
    1. No later than 1 month after the last day of employment if he is not offered re-employment and if he disputes the employer’s grounds for not offering re-employment including not meeting the re-employment eligibility criteria of satisfactory work performance and medically fitness, no suitable job vacancy or dismissal during re-employment; or
    2. No later than 6 months after the last day of employment if he feels that the terms and conditions of the re-employment offer and/ or the Employment Assistance Payment (EAP) amount offered is/ are unreasonable.

No records have been make public about the numbers of cases handled by MOM over such disputes. The Tripartite Alliance for Fair and Progressive Employment Practices (TAFEP) on the other hand has publicly announced that it received 1,055 complaints against employers over the last 3 years but only 12 cases heard within the same period of time.  (read more here)
The article also wrote, “40 per cent want to keep working because of financial commitments such as house loans and school-going children.”
So is the older workers workers willing to work for less? Or is it that they do not have a choice if they need to work into their later years?

The re-employment legislation is a joke?
When Roy Ngerng, Han Hui Hui and I went to Oslo last month to interview their Confederation of Trade Unions – what we encountered was disbelief and bewilderment from the unions that our re-employment legislation primarily allows the supervisor of the worker and the company to determine whether the worker is “healthy” enough to be offered re-employment.
Also, an employer can offer any terms – huge pay cut, longer work hours, heavier work load, etc – and if the employee does not accept – the employer would have fulfilled their obligations under the legislation.
If the employer does not want even to offer any terms – its just a one-time payment of $4,500 to $10,000.
In this connection, when most of our pilots were told recently that they would not be re-employed at age 62 – I wonder how much compensation they received – $10,000?
Another issue related to the re-employment act, may be that there is widespread age discrimination in regards to wages in Singapore.
MOM commissioned study?

A MOM commissioned study at a local university concluded that Singaporeans are expected to be more adequately prepared to retire than the average of the OECD countries.
Real wage growth declines with age?
According to the Retirement Study (“Retirement Study: High IRR?“, Nov 15), “In contrast to previous studies which assumed constant wage growth, we used data collected by the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) for the Labour Force Survey (LFS) over 2001 to 2011 to simulate real wage growth paths for individuals”.
“It is a hump-shaped distribution of earnings by age where wage growth is faster when the worker is young and tapers off into the negative as he gets older”.
empirical age earnings

Taken from “Adequacy of Singapore’s Central Provident Fund Payouts: Income Placement Rates of Entrant Workers

From the graph in the study, it appears that real earnings start to decline from around age 38, for males at the 50th percentile for earnings.
Our understanding is that at age 55, which is the age used to compute the Income Replacement Ratio (IRR), the real earnings would be about the same as that at around age 33.
So, does this mean that we are assuming that one would be earning at age 55, the real earnings equivalent of what one earned at around 33?
Is the above not statistical evidence that there is an existing age discrimination against older workers, since real wage growth declines with age, particularly for lower-wage occupations?
With the national newspapers giving an impression that older workers will gladly take a pay cut to keep their jobs, would the companies out there not take up the offer and suppress the already low wages for elderly workers in Singapore?
Uniquely Singapore!

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

网民比拇指赞家教良好 暖心女路边帮阿嬷收纸皮

善心女子帮助路边的阿嬷收纸皮,从白天收到黑夜,举止令人动容。一名路人见状拍视频录下女子帮助阿嬷的善举,上载到网站上,网民看了纷纷按赞,指女子家教良好,天使心肠。 有关的视频是由网民Raymond(55岁,德士司机)所录制。他当时是在吉兰丹巷(Kelantan Lane),准备前往用晚餐时看见这一幕。岂知在他用了晚餐后返回现场时,发现女子还在现场帮助阿嬷,所以决定拍下放上公民新闻网站STOMP。 从白天到黑夜 视频中,身穿培德中学红色汗衫的女子背着背包,站在阿嬷用来收纸皮的手推车旁边,不断帮忙阿嬷将纸皮拿起、折好后收入另一个纸盒中。 Raymond在受询时指出,当时他用完晚餐后已约晚上8时,看到女子还在帮助阿嬷,就趋前询问女子是不是一名义工。 他表示,当事女子腼腆的回答不是,只是想帮助老人家而已。 父亲以女儿为荣 女子帮助阿嬷到天黑,他的父亲见女儿天黑还未回家就出来寻找,发现女儿在住家附近帮助阿嬷收纸皮。Raymond当时就称赞女子的热心行为,女子父亲也表示以女儿为荣。 Raymond表示,阿嬷当时告诉女子父亲,曾经以潮州语向女子表示不用帮忙,但是女子好似不明白。她随后用手势和女子沟通,教女子将纸皮折平后,放入一个大的纸箱里。 阿嬷赞女子乖巧可爱 91岁的阿嬷郑应兰在隔日受询问时,证实了这件事情。她表示那名女子长相可爱、乖巧…

Cleaning up after Mr Mah

Dawson Koo / 21 May 2011 denotes a significant milestone in Singapore’s…

"FAQ on Sexuality" by HPB turns controversial

A set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on sexuality on the website…

从医生、社运份子到民主党主席 淡马亚展望狮城民主前景

于去年9月接任民主党主席的淡马亚医生(Paul Tambyah),日前接受亚洲新闻台记者巴拉蒂专访,针对医疗课题、反对党和公民社会、人权等社会议题侃侃而谈,认为虽然眼前荆棘满途,但乐观看待狮城民主社会发展,深信一党独大终会迎来终结。 淡马亚医生是国立大学医学教授,也是国大医院传染病学部高级顾问。有着传染病学研究专业背景,引导他投入社会运动,参与新加坡爱之病行动小组(Action For AIDS),与其他社运份子一起,尝试减少对艾滋病的偏见和歧视。 他的政治觉醒也是从此过程而来。他发现,新加坡人只要对某事拥有强烈信念,据理力争足以影响政府决策。随后,淡马亚对社运更加投入,包括创办了人权倡议组织“尊严”“MARUAH”。 但他体认到,公民社会可以针对各种议题发声,但是操纵杆仍掌握在政府手上,要想作出有影响力的改变,“诚如前总理吴作栋所言,你必须参与政党政治。” 这是当前在我国情境下能做的,即使淡马亚不完全认同。他对比国外扮演更显著角色的社运份子,他们不阻碍且鼓励公民社会成长,甚至获得政府拨款,和政府相互拉锯,但却获得平等尊重。 公民社会“前进三步,退两步” 淡马亚形容,新加坡的社运是“进三步,又退两步”。例如“尊严”获注册为政治组织,但同时又受限无法与其他海外公民组织合作,也不能接受海外献金。 “尊严”原本为东盟人权框架服务,但是办活动邀请菲律宾的人权份子,就要申请准证,这是造成东盟人权机制运作困难的原因之一。 至于芳林公园演说者角落也有诸多限制,例如必须检查出席集会者的身份证,确保没有外籍人士干涉。…