Lawyer M Ravi has issue an apology to the Attorney-General, in response to a complain letter that the AG has sent to the Law Society indicating that he has prematurely released court documents relating to cases he was handling to local and international media.
In the letter, dated 24 January 2014, the AG alleged that his actions were calculated to interfere with the fair proceedings of cases M Ravi was handling, which were then before the court.
M Ravi has earlier indicated that he will “vigorously defend” his position on this matter.
The following is the media release from M Ravi’s office.

[spacer style=”1″ icon=”none”]

Press Release

I, Mr Ravi s/o Madasamy had on various occasions (the details of which are set out in a letter from the Attorney-General dated 24 January 2014, which I attached here) caused Court documents to be prematurely released to the media and have made certain statements to the media, which I now regret.
The Attorney-General’s Chambers have in a letter dated 24 January 2014 pointed out that my actions may result in my clients gaining an unfair advantage in the various cases that I was acting in and / or may interfere in the conduct of fair proceedings by prejudicing the Respondent’s case in the minds of the public and / or to hold up the persons and institutions referred to in the affidavits to public obloquy.
This was never my intention.  Have considered the Attorney-General’s Chambers letter and the points raised therein, I accept their position and I unreservedly and unconditionally withdraw all the statements complained off in their letter of 24 January 2014 and I do sincerely apologise to the persons affected by my releasing the Court documents and statements referred to in the letter of 24 January 2014, to the media.
 

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

筹募备战选举运营资金 网络公民7月6日办募款晚宴

有鉴于新加坡选举可能在未来数月举行,为了备战选举,筹募选举期间所需的运营开销,网络公民将在7月6日(星期六),傍晚6时30分至9时,在新置地大厦(Singapore Land Tower)第45层顶层阁楼,举办募款晚宴。 “网络公民”是新加坡运作最久的独立网络媒体平台。2006年五月份全国大选,半年后“网络公民”成立。那个时候,读者可阅览的独立政经时事媒体平台,选择并不多。“网络公民”的出现为读者开启一道非主流论述的时事窗口,也涵盖被主流媒体忽略掉的社会课题。 但有别于其他资源富足的媒体机构,如今本社运营全凭总编辑许渊臣一力支撑,所幸还有一众志工或撰稿人供稿,以及社会热心民众提供资讯、给予各方面的协助,网络公民才得以陪伴各位读者到今天。 坦率地说,本地非官方、非主流网络媒体的维持,可说是举步维艰。早期本地网媒的创立,多出于本地公民社会的自发力量,期许能开创主流媒体以外的另一发声管道,突破一言堂的封锁。因此并不如主流媒体,有大集团或背后有实力雄厚的财力撑腰。(例如新传媒唯一股东是新加坡政府操控的淡马锡控股) 再者,还要面对相关机构诸多条例掣肘,又或者卷入与官方机构的诉讼,(例如2015年2月,国防部基于本社文章对该部构成骚扰,要求本社撤文;去年11月,本社被指刊载涉诽谤我国内阁成员内容的信函。许渊臣在刑事法典第500条文(刑事诽谤)下被提控。) 所以说,无国界记者组织(RSF)公布的世界新闻自由指数,在180个国家中我国排名第151名,不是没有原因的。 对言论自由的打压,不仅仅是体现在有没有记者被迫害,而是在我国有不少的法律都在钳制者媒体自由,更何况政府强行通过新法《防止网络假消息及网络操纵法案》,赋予部长相当大的权力来裁定何谓假消息,同时限制一些独立新闻媒体如本社的资金来源。 结果,在寒蝉效应之下,只有极少数的媒体或记者能“谨慎发言”,更多人只能“自我审查”,深怕一时失言说了不中听的话,惹怒了小气方丈,惹来官司缠身。 然而,即便面对种种不利情境,何以网络公民得以支撑至今日?这不仅仅是一己之力可以力挽狂澜,更重要的是:公民力量。正是每个关心新加坡前途的网络公民们,多年来默默地守候和支持,仰仗读者、社会热心人士的情义相挺,网络公民才能走得更远,紧随新加坡的社会和公民力量发展,生生不息。 在下月6日举行的募款晚宴,预计宴请200人,门票为每人100新元,欲知更多购票详情,可透过简讯或Whatsapp联系96155947。…

Citizen Statement on Prime Minister Lee’s Defamation Action against Mr Roy Ngerng

We are deeply concerned that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has sent…

Singaporean households find recycling regularly convenient but can’t differentiate between waste, ‘recyclable’ and ‘reusable’

In a joint statement by the Ministry of the Environment and Water…