Mr Ng (not his real name) was dining with his family in Pasir Panjang over the weekend when a traffic warden fined him for not displaying a parking coupon for his car.
Mr Ng explained that he did not realise that there was no free parking there on a Sunday.
“The half-done electronic gantries (not operational yet) at the entrance of car park gave me the wrong impression that they are going to collect fees in future, not now,” he said.
Despite this, Mr Ng admitted that he was at fault for “not checking the signage” and does not mind the $30 fine he has to pay.
Later, Mr Ng noticed that a Certis Cisco van which was parked next to his car also had no coupons displayed but it did not receive a fine from the parking warden.
He said he asked the warden if all vehicles in the car park without coupons would be summoned, to which the warden answered, “Yes.”
Mr Ng then proceeded to ask about the Certis Ciso vehicle and asked why it was not fined despite the vehicle not displaying a coupon.
Mr Ng said the warden “kept quiet” and continued to issue summons to other cars that did not display parking coupons.
“He even took pictures of those cars that he issue ticket,” Mr Ng said. “I asked him why, he explained that photos are evidence in case the car owner says he had put coupons.”
Mr Ng then asked the traffic warden to walk to the Cisco vehicle to personally see the absence of a coupon but the warden was about “20 metres away” and “did not move from where he was.”
This upsets Mr Ng.
I don’t mind the $30 fine I had which I am going to pay,” Mr Ng said. “But I cannot swallow the unequal law applied to different people in this country.”
Here is the summons which was issued to Mr Ng:
summon coupon
Here is the Certis Cisco van in question:
certis

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

AGC must act fairly to address Straits Times’ Contempt of Court

TOC Editorial It was hidden in page seven of the Straits Times…

逐步停用外包服务 Sparkletots寻找内部厨师

自从Sparkletots幼儿园集体食物中毒事件后,90巴仙的学生已返回校园,人民行动党社区基金(PCF)目前正在为其幼儿园寻找新的主厨,并且逐步停用外包供应商。 人民行动党社区基金会执行理事长马瑞发称,该基金会愿检讨所开出的厨师薪酬和福利待遇。已经完成获国家环境局(NEA)认证的基本食物卫生课程的多名行政人员,也将被部署到厨房去帮忙。 自星期一(4月1日)开始,16家幼儿园中的15家,主要是盛港和榜鹅区的幼儿园已经改用内部聘用的厨师。 当局星期五也表示,将探讨在榜鹅北部的最后一家拥有超过400名学生的幼儿园,为聘用厨师而设立更大的厨房设施。 另外三家使用不同外包供应商的幼儿园,将会转而聘用内部厨师。 没有出现新病例 首宗食物中毒事件发生在3月21日,共有来自13家该基金会旗下Sparkletots 幼儿园的239名儿童和12名教职员出现食物中毒的症状,其中的31人送院就医。239宗病例中,有40宗被证实是食物中毒。 目前所有的儿童已经出院,并且有90巴仙已经返回学校上课。 自星期二开始,就再也没有出现新病例。 有关的食物由外包供应商Kate’s Catering准备,该供应商目前已经被吊销执照了。…

张素兰:总理新闻秘书礼拜天也要工作

人权律师、前政治拘留者张素兰,今早在功能八号氏族会脸书专页,揶揄总理新闻秘书周日休假也要加班工作。 事缘本周日(本月1日),李总理新闻秘书张俪霖,代表总理向本社总编许渊臣发函,指本社英语站在8月15日刊登的一篇评论,复述针对总理的不实指控,要求本社撤下并在三日内道歉。 但张素兰指出,虽然秘书加班,用着公家的笔墨,撰写了长达三页含有威胁意味信函,但他加班并不是在为国家公务工作。 “总理因为有关评论被指复述此前他弟妹作出的指控,感到不满。在信中,总理称选择不起诉弟妹,不应被诠释为容许他人复述和散播这些指控。” 但张素兰也指出,随着总理要求本社总编许渊臣移除有关文章、并作出道歉,这同样也可视作总理可能已改变主意,不再避忌是否起诉弟妹李显扬和李玮玲医生。 她认为,如果诉诸诉讼,总理也要准备应对,许渊臣可邀请其弟妹作为证人,甚至请他们成为第二或第三答辩人。 “作为寻常百姓,我们并不知道真相。总理称在2017年的国会辩论中已给与充分解释,但仍是片面的”,张素兰也指出,她认为当时为了私人纠纷,特别召开听证会,乃是浪费公帑且滥用议会程序。更何况当时总理弟妹也没有受邀对此事进行辩解。 “或许是时候透过法庭来解决此事。” 除了张素兰外,昨日资深媒体人兼《海峡时报》前副总编辑默乐(Bertha Henson)则质问,总理选择不起诉弟妹,但是不容许他人复述、散播他们的指控,难道意味着总理的弟妹可以畅所欲言,但是其他人如果重复他们的言论就不可以?

IRAS: $50.2 billion in tax revenue collected in Financial Year 17/18

$50.2 billion in tax revenue was collected in Financial Year (FY) 2017/18,…