From TODAY
From TODAY
 
There have been 19 workplace deaths in the first three months of this year, the Workplace Safety and Health Council (WSHC) revealed in a report in April.
Out of these 19, fatalities at construction sites account for 12 of them.
That is one death per week, a shocking statistic.
Last year, there were a total of 59 workplace deaths – and 33 of them had occurred at construction sites.
That works out to seven fatalities per 100,000 workers, a rise from the 5.9 in 2012.
This is a far cry from the rate which Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong gave in May last year.
In his speech to launch the year’s workplace safety and health campaign, Mr Lee said, “Our workplace fatality rate has halved – it was 4.0 per 100,000 employees back in 2005; today it has gone down to 2.1 per 100,000 employees.”
Mr Lee cited several causes for the fatalities, such as workers speaking different languages and “they have different work practices in their home countries; that increases the risk of an accident.”
He also pointed to another potential factor – the many small and medium enterprises in the industry which, he said, “often lack the management capabilities or the resources to implement good workplace safety and health practices.”
“And also, they have a high turnover of staff, which makes it harder to build a strong safety culture,” he said.
However, later the same year, the authorities reported that the situation had gotten worse.
The TODAY newspaper reported that “the situation deteriorated around the second half of last year (2013), with 22 workplace deaths reported.”
“This was twice as many fatalities compared to the first half of the year, and five more compared to the same period in 2012,” Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Manpower Hawazi Daipi told Parliament in February this year.
He added, “This worrying trend continued into 2014, with eight out of every nine workplace fatalities in January coming from the construction industry alone.”
blame2
Employers and companies are now pointing at the government’s tightening of the foreign labour force, which provides the bulk of workers for construction companies, along with pressure to complete projects on schedule, as the causes for the rising number of fatalities.
The Straits Times reported on Sunday, 20 April 2014, “Construction industry players are blaming a sharp rise in worksite deaths on the shortage of workers coupled with pressure to complete projects on time.”
The companies also say that “with workers being made to put in longer hours… fatigue can set in and accidents happen.”
During the Committee of Inquiry (COI) hearing into the Little India riot, where a reported 400 Indian workers went on a rampage, it was disclosed by a Ministry of Manpower (MOM) official that there were 200,000 dormitory beds for foreign workers in purpose-built dormitories.
However, the number of Work Permit holders number almost 800,000.
That leaves more than half a million foreign workers living in shophouses, factory spaces, HDB flats, on-site, or some in poor makeshift accommodation, many badly run-down with inadequate facilities.
In 2012, during their strike against their employer, Singapore Mass Rapid Transit (SMRT), the 170 mainland Chinese bus drivers complained about overcrowding in their dormitories resulting in a lack of rest as one of their grievances.
Non-governmental organisations have also highlighted the problem of a lack of proper accommodation for the majority of Singapore’s migrant workers, which then results in workers being inadequately rested.
There are currently believed to be between 40 to 50 proper dormitories catering to the 800,000 Work Permit holders, clearly an undesirable and woefully inadequate situation.
This and other causes for the rising number of workplace fatalities are thus becoming a major concern.
In January, when 8 workers were killed, Acting Manpower Minister Tan Chuan Jin said, “This is not tenable. It is an employer’s basic responsibility to ensure that every worker returns home safely at the end of a hard day’s work.”
He also acknowledged that companies may be under pressure to complete projects on time, but he said “this may have led to the adoption of unsafe work procedures in order to speed things up.”
“I want to make it clear that, tight timelines or otherwise, there is no excuse for cutting corners or sacrificing workers’ safety or their lives,” he said.
The MOM had also issued several stop work orders in January, and is looking to impose new conditions on “construction companies to ensure safety lapses are resolved before a stop-work order can be lifted.” (TODAY)
However, these measures by the MOM could be nothing more than stop-gap and do not really get to the root of the problem – inadequate facilities for the workers to have proper rest, and the inadequate enforcement of labour laws such as limits on working hours, and also the lack of protection of workers’ rights in Singapore.
“No amount of posters, safety briefings, or safety inspections will help if employers do not treat workers with dignity, if we do not clamp down on abusive practices, and if we do not repeal regulations which restrict the rights of foreign workers,” wrote Jolovan Wham, the Acting Executive Director of the Humanitarian Organisation for Migration Economics (HOME). [See here.] “Exploitation has to be taken seriously, and the physical and psychological well-being of all workers needs to be addressed if we want long term and significant reductions in the number of work place fatalities and accidents.”
But perhaps not everyone takes that view.
“When we look at the migrant workers’ issue, we are not looking at it from the perspective of human rights,” Yeo Guat Kwang was reported to have said. Yeo is the chairman of the government-affiliated migrant workers aid group, Migrant Workers Centre.
He reportedly told the  China Labour Bulletin, “At the end of the day, whatever factors would be able to help us to sustain the growth of the economy for the benefit of our countrymen, for the benefit of our country; we will definitely go for it.”
Perhaps it is time to discard such myopic thinking, in light of the rising number of deaths of our foreign workers.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
You May Also Like

民主党提“新加坡人优先”人口政策倡议 质疑行动党移民政策

民主党在本周六推介该党的人口政策提案《增强国民:健全政策,保障未来》。有关提案的其中一项献议,是基于积分的才能评估系统,要在新加坡工作的外籍专才,得先提交申请,以对他们的个人资历、技能和经验进行评估。 达到合格积分者将列入候选名单,之后雇主可从该名单中录取外籍雇员。不过前提是,雇主需事先证明没有合适的新加坡人符合有关职缺需求。 值得一提的是,民主党第四个政策提案推介,乃是由该党新人陈雅慧主持。后者相信,上述提案有助于避免雇主因为外籍人士愿意接受较低薪酬,而优先录取他们。 民主党认为,有鉴于新加坡PMET(专业人士、经理、执行人员和技师)群体持续遭到歧视和面对裁员,而提出上述提案。 在今年三月,现任副总理暨财政部长王瑞杰曾表示,新加坡要保持长远永续成长,就应以人口达到一千万的情况作规划。他告知国人应该对外来者保持开放心态。 陈雅慧也对王瑞杰的观点提出质疑,因为我国已是全球人口密度最高的区域之一,若透过吸引外籍人士,把人口增加到一千万,恐怕会令新加坡难以负荷。 至于民主党中委江伟贤也指出,事实上,新加坡几乎是全球最不快乐、劳动者压力最大的国度。罔顾人民的身心健康和幸福,人民行动党一味地把更多外国人塞进这个岛国,结果只会适得其反。 他补充,低生育率和高移民率,也使得本土国人的人口萎缩。而高昂生活成本和生活压力,也是导致国人不得不远走他乡,或是少生孩子的原因。 为了应对眼前这些问题,民主党的人口政策提案提出十大献议,包括确保国人生活成本可负担,让国人能享有更美好的生活。 陈雅慧认为,近年政府一再提高税赋,导致国内生活成本提高,也加剧了人口萎缩的问题。“这就是为何把消费税从7巴仙再调高到9巴仙,绝对是个坏主意。” 民主党也献议基本必需品如食物、药物、学校用品应豁免于消费税。 民主党也指出,人民行动党不惜一切代价,只为了要增加国内生产总值的增长,却误以为引进外籍人士,不成比例地增长人口也可达成目标,这是一大谬误。…

PM Lee’s ESS speech and Q & A session

Economic Society of Singapore Annual Dinner 2012 Question & Answer Seesion –…

MFA: Malaysia lost the right to review the price of water under the 1962 Water Agreement

Singapore has been clear and consistent that its position is that Malaysia…

Workplace Safety Issues of Domestic Workers

This joint statement is endorsed by both the Think Centre and Transient…